Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

53%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
168 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
82 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
61 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
9.4ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 14,185
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 39 48 61
1440p QHD 54 70 87 110
1080p Full HD 82 106 132 168

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Low 168
1920x1080 Medium 132
1920x1080 Ultra 82
2560x1440 High 70
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Low 61
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a desktop combination measured in Fivem, a multiplayer title from 2017. The database records frame rates at three resolutions and four quality presets. The RTX 5050 has a launch MSRP of 249 USD. The data shows that this combo delivers smooth performance at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a significant drop in visual quality to reach the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded FPS values are as follows. For Medium settings, the database also captured minimum and maximum frame times, which provide a sense of variance.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 39 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 61 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 48 | 41 | 56 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 70 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 110 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 87 | 74 | 100 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 54 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 106 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 168 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 132 | 112 | 152 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 82 | - | - |

At 4K, only Low settings break the 60 FPS barrier, with an average of 61 FPS. Medium drops to 48, High to 39, and Ultra to 30. The min/max range for Medium at 4K is 41 to 56, showing that even the average is below the playable threshold. At 1440p, the picture improves: High, Low, and Medium all exceed 60 FPS, with averages of 70, 110, and 87 respectively. Ultra falls short at 54. At 1080p, every preset is above 60 FPS, with Low reaching 168, Medium 132, High 106, and Ultra 82. The Medium preset at 1080p has a min of 112 and max of 152, indicating consistent frame delivery.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database places the i5-10400F and RTX 5050 near several other components based on average benchmark scores. For the CPU, the nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 6756E (average score 14163, delta 0.2%), the Intel Core 7 160UL (14232, delta -0.3%), the AMD EPYC 7552 (14115, delta 0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (14277, delta -0.6%). All of these sit within 0.6% of the i5-10400F's average benchmark score of 14185. In CPU-bound scenarios, swapping to any of these would likely produce very similar frame rates.

For the GPU, the RTX 5050's average benchmark score is 21035. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, delta -0.6%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, delta -1%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, delta 1.6%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379, delta -1.6%). The small deltas suggest that these graphics cards would behave comparably in terms of raw compute, though actual game performance can vary. The RX 5600 XT, with a positive delta of 1.6%, is the closest competitor that slightly outperforms the RTX 5050 in synthetic tests.

CPU and GPU Roles

The FPS scaling across resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the processor and the graphics card. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 168 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 110 FPS, a 34.5% reduction. At 4K Low, it falls to 61 FPS, another 44.5% reduction. The same pattern holds for Ultra: 82 FPS at 1080p, 54 at 1440p (34.1% drop), and 30 at 4K (44.4% drop). The consistent percentage drops between resolution steps, despite the pixel count quadrupling from 1080p to 4K, indicate that the GPU is not the only limiting factor. If the GPU were fully saturated, the FPS drop would be closer to the pixel increase. Instead, the CPU's performance ceiling appears to cap frame rates at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the dominant constraint as resolution climbs.

The gap between Low and Ultra also tells a story. At 1080p, the difference is 86 FPS (168 vs 82). At 1440p, it is 56 FPS (110 vs 54). At 4K, it is 31 FPS (61 vs 30). The absolute gap narrows as resolution increases, suggesting that the GPU's ability to handle higher settings is more limited at 4K. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push Low settings to 168 FPS, but the GPU cannot keep up with Ultra at the same resolution. This implies that at 1080p, the RTX 5050 is the primary bottleneck for high settings, while at 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor across all presets.

The Verdict

The verdict from the database is clear. At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 61 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the combo can run High, Low, and Medium with averages of 70, 110, and 87 FPS respectively, but Ultra drops to 54. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra achieving 82 FPS and Low reaching 168 FPS. Therefore, this PC can run Fivem comfortably at 1080p and 1440p with high quality settings, but 4K gaming is only viable at the lowest preset.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the i5-10400F and RTX 5050 ranks 2275 out of 3707 tested combos in the database. This places it above the median, meaning it outperforms more than half of all recorded configurations. While not a top-tier setup, it sits in a solid mid-range position. The rank reflects the overall capability of the pair across the entire benchmark suite, not just Fivem, but it gives a sense of where this combo stands relative to other hardware pairings.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is as follows:

  • 3840x2160: Low, with an average of 61 FPS. No higher preset reaches 60.
  • 2560x1440: High, with an average of 70 FPS. Medium and Low also exceed 60, but High is the most visually demanding option that stays playable.
  • 1920x1080: Ultra, with an average of 82 FPS. All presets are above 60, so Ultra is the best choice for maximum quality.

These settings provide the highest fidelity while ensuring the frame rate remains fluid.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p Ultra?

A: The average is 82 FPS.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium?

A: The minimum is 74 FPS, with a maximum of 100 and an average of 87.

Q: Which resolution and preset delivers the highest average FPS?

A: 1080p Low, at 168 FPS.

Q: Is 4K playable with this combo?

A: Only at Low settings, which averages 61 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 2275 out of 3707 combos, placing it above the median.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5050?

A: The launch MSRP is 249 USD.