Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

69%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
224 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
128 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
171 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
84 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
95 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
47 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 14,185
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 60 75 95
1440p QHD 84 108 135 171
1080p Full HD 128 164 205 224

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 164
1920x1080 Low 224
1920x1080 Medium 205
1920x1080 Ultra 128
2560x1440 High 108
2560x1440 Low 171
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 Ultra 84
3840x2160 High 60
3840x2160 Low 95
3840x2160 Medium 75
3840x2160 Ultra 47

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem shows a clear performance curve that scales predictably with resolution and preset level. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 47 FPS at Ultra settings to 95 FPS at Low settings. The Medium preset delivers an average of 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 86 FPS, which is the only 4K configuration with complete min/max data recorded. High settings at 4K produce exactly 60 FPS on average, while Ultra drops to 47 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves substantially. Low settings produce an average of 171 FPS, Medium reaches 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 and maximum of 156, High sits at 108 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a strong 84 FPS average. The 1440p Medium preset is the only configuration in this resolution with min/max readings, showing a 41 FPS spread between the recorded low and high marks.

At 1920x1080, the combination delivers very high frame rates across all presets. Low settings average 224 FPS, Medium averages 205 FPS with a minimum of 175 and maximum of 236, High averages 164 FPS, and Ultra averages 128 FPS. The 1080p Medium data shows the tightest relative spread among all measured configurations with min/max values, a 61 FPS difference between the lowest and highest recorded frames.

The scaling pattern between resolutions reveals consistent behavior. Dropping from 4K to 1440p increases average FPS by roughly 80 percent at High settings, while dropping from 1440p to 1080p adds another 52 percent at the same preset. The Ultra preset shows the largest absolute gains when lowering resolution: 47 FPS at 4K, 84 FPS at 1440p, and 128 FPS at 1080p.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers exactly 60 FPS on average. Medium also qualifies for playable status with 75 FPS, and Low runs at 95 FPS, but High represents the visual ceiling while maintaining the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 47 FPS does not meet the playable standard.

For 2560x1440, all four presets clear 60 FPS, and the best settings are Ultra with an average of 84 FPS. This leaves substantial headroom above the playable threshold even at maximum visual quality. The next step down, High, runs at 108 FPS, showing that the GPU has enough capacity at this resolution to handle the full preset range comfortably.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best playable preset with an average of 128 FPS. Every preset from Low to Ultra remains well above 60 FPS, with Low reaching 224 FPS and Medium at 205 FPS. The combination of this CPU and GPU at 1080p is never constrained by the playable threshold, even at the highest settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only up to High settings. The recorded average at 3840x2160 with High preset is exactly 60 FPS, while Medium reaches 75 FPS and Low reaches 95 FPS. Ultra falls to 47 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 84 FPS, making it the highest quality preset that maintains smooth performance. All four presets at this resolution exceed 60 FPS, so users can select Ultra without compromising playability.

Q: How much performance difference exists between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: The gap is 96 FPS on average. Low settings run at 224 FPS, while Ultra runs at 128 FPS. Medium falls between at 205 FPS, and High sits at 164 FPS.

Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times across presets?

A: The available min/max data shows reasonable consistency. At 4K Medium, frames range from 64 to 86 FPS around a 75 FPS average. At 1440p Medium, the range is 115 to 156 FPS around a 135 FPS average. At 1080p Medium, frames span 175 to 236 FPS around a 205 FPS average.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of visual quality and performance headroom?

A: 2560x1440 with Ultra settings delivers 84 FPS on average, which is 24 FPS above the playable threshold while allowing maximum visual fidelity. At 4K, the best playable preset is High with exactly 60 FPS, leaving no margin for frame drops.

Q: Is the 60 FPS threshold ever a concern at 1080p?

A: No. The lowest recorded average at 1080p is 128 FPS at Ultra settings, which is more than double the playable threshold. Even the most demanding preset at the lowest tested resolution keeps performance far above minimum requirements.

The Verdict

This combination can run Fivem successfully across all three tested resolutions, but the playable preset ceiling varies significantly. At 3840x2160, the system clears 60 FPS on High, Medium, and Low settings, with High being the best visual option at exactly 60 FPS average. Ultra at 4K is not playable, producing only 47 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system achieves playable performance on every preset, with Ultra averaging 84 FPS. This is the resolution where the hardware shows its strongest balance: maximum settings remain comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold with 24 FPS of headroom. High settings at 1440p reach 108 FPS, Medium hits 135 FPS, and Low runs at 171 FPS.

At 1920x1080, every preset delivers a playable experience with substantial margin. Ultra averages 128 FPS, High averages 164 FPS, Medium averages 205 FPS, and Low averages 224 FPS. The verdict data confirms that this system is fully capable of running Fivem at playable frame rates in all tested resolutions except 4K Ultra, where the average drops to 47 FPS.

For users prioritizing visual quality at 4K, the High preset is the ceiling. For those who want maximum fidelity without concern, 1440p Ultra is the optimal configuration. At 1080p, any preset delivers far more performance than required.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling between resolutions and presets indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor in Fivem at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes relatively more relevant at lower resolutions. The data shows that dropping from 4K to 1440p produces large FPS gains across all presets, and dropping further to 1080p yields additional gains, which is consistent with a GPU-bound workload.

At 4K, the Ultra preset averages 47 FPS while High averages 60 FPS, a 13 FPS difference that reflects the GPU struggling with maximum settings at the highest pixel count. The jump from Medium to High at 4K is 15 FPS (75 to 60), while Low to Medium is 20 FPS (95 to 75). These gaps narrow at lower resolutions: at 1440p, Ultra to High is 24 FPS, High to Medium is 27 FPS, and Medium to Low is 36 FPS. At 1080p, the preset gaps range from 36 to 41 FPS between adjacent settings.

The pattern suggests that at 1080p, where the GPU has ample headroom (224 FPS at Low), the CPU's performance characteristics become more visible in the upper preset ranges. The Intel Core i5-10400F has a 68th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E at 14163 (0.2 percent difference) and the AMD EPYC 7552 at 14115 (0.5 percent difference). This places the processor in a competitive mid-range position for this workload.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks in the 81st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 37648, placing it near the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, 0.1 percent difference) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507, 0.4 percent difference). The GPU's strong absolute performance explains why resolution scaling has such a pronounced effect on FPS: the RTX 4070 has ample compute resources that become increasingly utilized as pixel count rises.

The 4K Ultra result of 47 FPS versus the 1080p Ultra result of 128 FPS illustrates how much the GPU is stretched at the highest resolution. The 4K Medium min/max spread of 64 to 86 FPS also shows that even when the average is playable, frame dips can approach the threshold. At 1440p and 1080p, the min/max data at Medium settings shows much larger absolute margins above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing ranks 1027 out of 3707 tested combos. This places the combination in the upper 28 percent of all recorded systems for this game, indicating strong overall performance relative to the broader field of tested hardware configurations.

The ranking context shows that while this system is not among the top performers, it sits well above the median tested combination. The GPU's 81st percentile standing among all GPUs contributes significantly to this position, as does the CPU's 68th percentile ranking. The combination of a solid mid-range processor with a high-end graphics card produces a system that handles Fivem comfortably at most settings and resolutions.

The delta percentages against nearest rivals further contextualize the hardware. The CPU sits within 0.6 percent of its closest competitors in average benchmark score, meaning small performance differences separate it from adjacent rankings. The GPU similarly sits within 1.3 percent of its nearest rivals, with the RTX 4080 Mobile slightly ahead at 38135 and the Tesla P4 nearly identical at 37628.

For Fivem specifically, the 1027th rank out of 3707 combos reflects a system that delivers playable frame rates in 11 of the 12 measured configurations, with only 4K Ultra falling short. The database results confirm that this pairing is a capable choice for the game, particularly for users targeting 1440p or 1080p with high or ultra settings. At 4K, the system remains viable with High settings, though the exact 60 FPS average leaves little margin for demanding scenes.