Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

47%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
214 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
104 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
143 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
70 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
80 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
7.5ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 14,185
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 17,208

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 47 64 80
1440p QHD 70 88 112 143
1080p Full HD 104 133 170 214

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 133
1920x1080 Low 214
1920x1080 Medium 170
1920x1080 Ultra 104
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 143
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 Ultra 70
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 80
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 presents a compelling dataset for Fivem, a multiplayer title that often behaves differently from single-player benchmarks. The recorded measurements reveal a system that is highly capable at standard resolutions, but which encounters a firm ceiling at 4K. The data indicates that this combination is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers substantial headroom above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS varies significantly by resolution. The data shows a clear step-down in graphical ambition as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the system can only sustain playable frame rates on the Medium preset. The average FPS at Medium is 63.8, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset falls to 46.9 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 36 FPS, making both unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Low runs at 80.1 FPS, but Medium is the highest quality option that remains playable.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves dramatically. The system achieves playable performance on all four tested presets. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, still delivers an average of 69.7 FPS. This makes Ultra the best settings choice for this resolution, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while staying above the 60 FPS line.

At 1920x1080, the system has abundant performance. The Ultra preset averages 103.9 FPS, making it the clear choice for maximum quality. The lower presets are all far above the threshold, with Low reaching 213.7 FPS, but Ultra is the best setting because it offers the most demanding visuals while still nearly doubling the playability threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database for Fivem, this specific CPU and GPU combination holds a rank of 1574 out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the upper half of all recorded configurations, roughly in the 42nd percentile of tested systems. The rank suggests that while this is not an extreme high-end pairing, it sits comfortably above the median for this particular game.

The ranking reflects a balanced system. The CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions, and the GPU is strong enough to push high frame rates. The position in the rankings indicates that many other combinations are slower, but a significant number are also faster, likely those with newer generation processors or higher-tier graphics cards. The data implies that this combo is a solid mid-to-upper tier choice for Fivem, capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and smooth 60 FPS experiences at 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded FPS data provides a detailed look at how the system scales with resolution and settings. The measurements are average FPS values, with no minimum or maximum frame times recorded in the dataset.

3840x2160:

At 4K, the system is heavily taxed. The Low preset averages 80.1 FPS. Medium drops to 63.8 FPS. High falls to 46.9 FPS. Ultra is the most demanding, averaging 36 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 55% reduction in average frame rate, showing the extreme cost of the highest settings at this resolution.

2560x1440:

At 1440p, performance is much stronger. The Low preset averages 142.6 FPS. Medium delivers 112.4 FPS. High reaches 88.2 FPS. Ultra averages 69.7 FPS. The step from High to Ultra is a 21% drop, but the system still maintains a playable frame rate. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 51% reduction, slightly less severe than at 4K.

1920x1080:

At 1080p, the system excels. The Low preset averages 213.7 FPS. Medium reaches 169.7 FPS. High delivers 133.4 FPS. Ultra averages 103.9 FPS. Even at Ultra, the system has 43 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 51% reduction, consistent with the pattern seen at 1440p.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 3070 handles 1080p and 1440p with ease, but the jump to 4K causes a significant performance cliff, especially at High and Ultra settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with High settings?

A: No. The recorded data shows an average of 46.9 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice. It delivers an average of 69.7 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that remains above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is 1080p Ultra compared to 1440p Ultra?

A: The 1080p Ultra preset averages 103.9 FPS, while 1440p Ultra averages 69.7 FPS. This represents a 49% increase in average frame rate when dropping from 1440p to 1080p.

Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The recorded data shows that all presets at 2560x1440, including Ultra, maintain average frame rates above 60 FPS. The lowest average is 69.7 FPS on Ultra.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 213.7 FPS, while Ultra averages 103.9 FPS. The Ultra preset is 51% slower than Low.

Q: Is the system more limited by the CPU or GPU at 4K?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The frame rates drop sharply with increased graphical settings, indicating the RTX 3070 is struggling to fill the higher pixel count, rather than the CPU being unable to feed it frames.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals distinct roles for the CPU and GPU depending on the resolution. At 1080p, the system produces very high frame rates, with the Low preset exceeding 200 FPS. This high output suggests that the CPU, the Intel Core i5-10400F with 6 cores and 12 threads, is capable of feeding the GPU quickly. The GPU is likely the primary limiter even at 1080p, as the frame rates scale directly with graphical settings, but the CPU is not holding the system back from reaching high averages.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The frame rates are lower than 1080p but still high, with Ultra at 69.7 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent drop across all presets, indicating the GPU is doing more work per frame. The CPU is still keeping up, as the frame rates remain well above 60 FPS even on the most demanding preset.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The frame rates plummet, especially on High and Ultra. The difference between 1440p Ultra at 69.7 FPS and 4K Ultra at 36 FPS is a 48% drop, a massive reduction that points directly at the GPU's rendering limits. The RTX 3070, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus, is overwhelmed by the pixel count of 3840x2160 at high settings. The CPU is likely underutilized at this resolution, as the GPU cannot process frames fast enough to keep it busy.

The data implies that for this game, the RTX 3070 is the deciding factor at 4K, while the i5-10400F provides ample support at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10283 and a Passmark single-thread score of 2541, indicate it has sufficient single-thread performance for gaming, which is confirmed by the high frame rates at lower resolutions.

The Verdict

The recorded verdict data is clear: this PC can run Fivem effectively, but the experience depends heavily on resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable on all settings. The best setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 103.9. This is a definitive pass, offering high visual quality and performance far above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system is also fully playable on all settings. The best setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 69.7. This is a strong pass, providing excellent visuals with a comfortable margin above the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system is only partially playable. The playable settings are Low and Medium, with the best being Medium at 63.8 FPS. High and Ultra presets fail to reach 60 FPS. Therefore, 4K gaming is possible, but only with reduced graphical fidelity.

The verdict is that this PC is an excellent choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Fivem, offering high or ultra settings with smooth frame rates. For 4K, it is a conditional pass, requiring players to use Medium settings to stay above 60 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rivals for both the CPU and GPU, indicating hardware that would produce similar benchmark results.

For the Intel Core i5-10400F, the closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the Intel Xeon 6756E, which is 0.2% faster, and the AMD EPYC 7552, which is 0.5% faster. On the other side, the Intel Core 7 160UL is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is 0.6% slower. These alternatives would likely provide a very similar gaming experience in Fivem, as their compute performance is nearly identical to the i5-10400F.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which is 0.7% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, which is 1% faster. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M is 1.1% faster, while the NVIDIA Tesla K40c is 1.5% slower. These GPU alternatives are very close in raw benchmark performance. However, the RTX 3070's modern feature set, including 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, may offer different real-world behavior in specific games. In Fivem, these rival GPUs would likely land within a few frames per second of the RTX 3070, making them viable substitutes depending on availability.