Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 31 | 39 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 56 | 71 | 89 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 86 | 107 | 136 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a clear performance profile in Fivem, with the data indicating a system that is fully capable of delivering smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, but one that falls short of the 60 FPS playability threshold at 4K. The recorded measurements show a strong scaling of performance as resolution decreases, allowing the combination to hit high frame rates at more common desktop resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a comprehensive view of its capabilities. At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates across all settings. The Low preset returns an average of 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to an average of 39 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 45 FPS. High settings yield an average of 31 FPS, and Ultra is the most demanding, producing an average of only 24 FPS. None of these 4K results approach smooth gameplay.
Moving down to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves considerably. The Low preset achieves an average of 89 FPS, which is a substantial jump over the 4K Low result. Medium settings deliver an average of 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS, indicating that the frame rate remains consistently above the playability threshold. High settings average 56 FPS, just short of 60, while Ultra averages 44 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is viable only at Low and Medium presets for a steady experience.
At 1920x1080, the combination shows its strongest performance. The Low preset produces an average of 136 FPS, which is remarkably high and indicates the CPU and GPU have ample headroom at this resolution. Medium settings average 107 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS, ensuring a very smooth experience with no dips below the threshold. High settings average 86 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset manages an average of 67 FPS. The frame rates at 1080p are consistently high, and the system never falls below the 60 FPS minimum in the settings that include min/max data.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The database places the Intel Core i5-10400F at the 68th percentile among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rivals in the recorded data are very closely matched. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, which is 0.2% slower. The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232, putting it 0.3% ahead of the i5-10400F. The AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115, which is 0.5% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14277, making it 0.6% faster. These deltas are all under one percent, meaning a user moving between any of these processors would see virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem.
For the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rivals are similarly close in performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, just 0.1% behind the Arc B570. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, placing it 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, which is 0.4% slower, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, placing it 0.5% faster. These results indicate that the Arc B570 performs on par with this group of GPUs, and in a real-world Fivem session, any of these alternatives would likely produce nearly identical frame rates when paired with a similar processor.
Best Settings per Resolution
Determining the best settings requires identifying the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the data shows that no preset achieves this goal. The highest average FPS at this resolution is 50 on Low settings, which falls short of the playable threshold. Therefore, there is no recommended preset for 4K based on the measurements.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium. The Medium preset produces an average of 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS, which satisfies the playability requirement. While Low settings achieve a higher average of 89 FPS, Medium is the most demanding preset that still clears the 60 FPS bar, offering a better visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.
At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra. The Ultra preset averages 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset available, and the fact that it remains playable demonstrates the combination's strength at this resolution. Lower presets like High, Medium, and Low all produce higher average frame rates, but Ultra is the optimal choice for visual fidelity while maintaining smooth gameplay.
The Verdict
The recorded verdict data is clear about this system's capabilities. At 3840x2160, the list of playable settings is empty, meaning no preset reaches an average of 60 FPS. The best average at this resolution is 50 FPS on Low, which is not sufficient. The verdict for 4K is that this PC cannot run Fivem at a playable frame rate.
At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Low and Medium. The best of these is Medium, with an average FPS of 71. This confirms that the system can run Fivem smoothly at 1440p, provided the user selects Medium or lower settings. The High and Ultra presets fall below the threshold, so they should be avoided at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, all four presets, High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, are listed as playable. The best setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 67. This indicates that the combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and Intel Arc B570 is fully capable of running Fivem at maximum settings on a 1080p display, maintaining an average frame rate above the 60 FPS target. Overall, this PC is a strong performer for Fivem at 1080p, a solid performer at 1440p with adjusted settings, and not suitable for 4K gameplay.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution?
A: No. The recorded data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160, as the highest average FPS is 50 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best setting for Fivem at 2560x1440?
A: The best playable setting at 2560x1440 is Medium, which achieves an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS.
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-10400F + Intel Arc B570 combination reach 60 FPS at 1080p on Ultra?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to the Intel Arc A750?
A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582. The Arc A750 is 0.1% faster according to the database.
Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p on High settings?
A: The average FPS at 2560x1440 on High settings is 56, which is just below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: How many presets are playable at 1920x1080?
A: All four tested presets are playable at 1920x1080: High, Low, Medium, and Ultra.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and Intel Arc B570 is ranked 2980 out of 3707 tested combos in the database for Fivem. This places it in the lower half of all tested combinations, which is a direct result of its inability to achieve playable frame rates at 4K. However, this ranking does not tell the whole story, as the system is quite capable at lower resolutions. The data shows that it performs admirably at 1080p, with all presets clearing the 60 FPS mark, and it maintains playability at 1440p with Medium or Low settings. The rank reflects the full range of tested resolutions, and the system's weakness at 4K pulls its overall position down. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combination is a competent performer, but the database ranking indicates that many other tested combinations offer broader resolution support.