Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination in Fivem shows a clear performance curve across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system is highly capable: Low settings produce an average of 175 FPS, Medium delivers 138 FPS (with a minimum of 117 and maximum of 159), High reaches 111 FPS, and Ultra stays comfortably at 86 FPS. The 1080p results show no preset drops below the 60 FPS threshold, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a solid margin above it.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but begin to separate more noticeably by preset. Low settings average 115 FPS, Medium averages 91 FPS (with a minimum of 77 and maximum of 105), and High delivers 73 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls to an average of 56 FPS, which sits below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This marks the first point where the combination cannot sustain a fully maxed-out experience.

At 3840x2160, the load becomes much heavier. Low settings still manage an average of 64 FPS, just clearing the playability bar. Medium drops to 50 FPS (with a minimum of 43 and maximum of 58), High falls to 40 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 31 FPS. The 4K results indicate that only the lowest preset remains playable, and even then with a narrow margin above the 60 FPS line. The minimum and maximum figures recorded only for the Medium preset at each resolution provide some insight into frame pacing, and at 4K Medium the spread from 43 to 58 FPS shows consistent sub-60 performance throughout.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component carries the workload in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the CPU has strong influence: the gap between Low and Ultra is 89 FPS (175 versus 86), which is a substantial range that reflects how the processor handles the game's logic and draw calls at lower resolution. The Intel Core i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, as even Ultra stays well above 60 FPS.

When resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. The drop from 1080p Ultra (86 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (56 FPS) is 30 FPS, a 35% reduction, while the drop from 1080p Low (175 FPS) to 1440p Low (115 FPS) is 60 FPS, a 34% reduction. These proportional decreases suggest that the Radeon RX 9060 is becoming the limiting factor as pixel count rises, though the CPU still contributes to the overall ceiling. The 1440p Ultra result falling below 60 FPS while High stays at 73 FPS indicates a sharp GPU performance cliff at the highest preset.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint. The 4K Ultra average of 31 FPS is less than half of the 1440p Ultra figure, and the 4K High average of 40 FPS shows the same pattern. The fact that 4K Low (64 FPS) is the only playable option reinforces that the RX 9060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, are stretched thin at this resolution. The CPU, meanwhile, has enough headroom at 4K because the GPU cannot generate frames fast enough to demand more from the processor. The recorded data shows a textbook shift: CPU-bound at 1080p, balanced at 1440p, and heavily GPU-bound at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?

A: Yes, all four presets at 1920x1080 clear the 60 FPS threshold. Low averages 175 FPS, Medium averages 138 FPS, High averages 111 FPS, and Ultra averages 86 FPS.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: High settings at 1440p average 73 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. Ultra at 1440p falls to 56 FPS, below the threshold.

Q: Does the game run playably at 4K on this hardware?

A: Only at Low settings. The 3840x2160 Low preset averages 64 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra at 4K all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 50, 40, and 31 FPS respectively.

Q: How consistent is the frame rate at Medium settings across resolutions?

A: The recorded minimum and maximum values show a tightening range as resolution drops. At 4K Medium, the range is 43 to 58 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it is 77 to 105 FPS. At 1080p Medium, it is 117 to 159 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The CPU plays a larger role at 1080p, as evidenced by the wide 89 FPS spread between Low and Ultra presets. The 6-core, 12-thread Intel Core i5-10400F is sufficient to keep the GPU fed at this resolution.

Q: How does the system rank among all tested combinations for Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 2172 out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database for this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly. For the Intel Core i5-10400F, the closest matches in average benchmark score are the Intel Xeon 6756E (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core 7 160UL (0.3% behind), the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (0.6% behind). These processors sit within a very tight band around the i5-10400F's average score of 14185, meaning any of them would likely produce nearly identical CPU-side performance in Fivem.

For the AMD Radeon RX 9060, the nearest GPU rivals are tightly clustered. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 0.7% behind in average score, the AMD Radeon R9 370X is 1% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% ahead. The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014 places it in the same performance class as these cards, so swapping to any of them would yield broadly similar frame rates in Fivem at the same settings. The RTX 3060 Ti being essentially a statistical tie (0.7% lower score) suggests it would reproduce the same 1080p and 1440p playability patterns, including the 1440p Ultra shortfall and the 4K Low-only playability.

Combining the CPU and GPU rival lists, a system with any of the four similar processors paired with any of the four similar graphics cards would land within roughly 2% of this combo's overall performance. The practical takeaway is that Fivem players in this hardware tier can expect comparable results from a range of components, with the resolution-dependent playability boundaries remaining consistent.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are Ultra, with an average of 86 FPS. Since all four presets clear the threshold at this resolution, there is no reason to compromise on visual quality. The 86 FPS average provides enough headroom above the 60 FPS line to absorb minor frame drops during busy multiplayer moments.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, with an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 56 FPS, so High is the maximum preset that maintains playability. The 73 FPS average leaves a 13 FPS margin above the threshold, which is workable but not as generous as the 1080p Ultra figure.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Low, with an average of 64 FPS. This is the only preset at 4K that clears the 60 FPS line, and the margin is slim at just 4 FPS. Players who prioritize 4K resolution will need to accept the lowest preset, and even then, frame drops could push below 60 FPS during heavy scenes. The Medium preset at 4K, with its recorded minimum of 43 FPS, shows that any increase in visual fidelity comes at a steep cost.

The Verdict

This system can run Fivem, but the playable envelope depends heavily on resolution and preset selection. The 1920x1080 verdict is fully positive: every preset from Low to Ultra maintains an average above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 86 FPS providing a comfortable experience. Players using a 1080p monitor can max out the game without concern.

The 2560x1440 verdict is conditionally positive. High, Medium, and Low presets all clear the threshold, with High being the best playable option at 73 FPS. The Ultra preset at 56 FPS is not playable by the 60 FPS standard, so 1440p users must choose between High settings at a solid frame rate or Ultra settings with noticeable stutter.

The 3840x2160 verdict is mostly negative. Only Low settings clear the threshold, and the 64 FPS average is barely above the line. Medium, High, and Ultra at 4K all fall well below 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset at 31 FPS being effectively unplayable for smooth gameplay. The data indicates this combination is not suited for 4K gaming in Fivem beyond the lowest visual settings.

Overall, the Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination is a capable 1080p and 1440p pairing for Fivem, with the caveat that 1440p Ultra is out of reach and 4K is severely limited. The 8 GB of VRAM and the GPU's bandwidth constraints become apparent as resolution climbs, while the six-core CPU holds up well across the board.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this combination at rank 2172 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, putting it in the 58th percentile of all tested systems. This is a middle-of-the-pack result, which aligns with the measured performance: the system is fully capable at 1080p, mostly capable at 1440p, and only marginally playable at 4K. The rank reflects that many other tested combinations achieve higher frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions, but it also shows that this combo outperforms a substantial portion of the tested field.

The rank of 2172 out of 3707 means roughly 58% of tested combos perform better, while about 42% perform worse. For a mid-range CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, this position is reasonable. The i5-10400F sits in the 68th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 9060 sits in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, so the combo rank of 58% is consistent with the individual component standings. The system does not punch above its weight in Fivem, but it does not underperform either. The data shows a balanced result: the components deliver frame rates that match their benchmark positions, with the resolution-dependent playability boundaries following the expected pattern for hardware in this class.