Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Fivem with the Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 covers three resolutions and four quality presets. All figures represent average frame rates, as the database did not record minimum or maximum values for this combination.

At 1920x1080, the results span a wide range. The Low preset reaches 161.6 FPS, which is the highest average recorded for this combo at any resolution. Medium drops to 126.9 FPS, High settles at 103.9 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 77.1 FPS. Every preset at this resolution clears the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the Ultra preset retaining a comfortable margin above it.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down noticeably but remain playable for most presets. Low produces 105.3 FPS, Medium delivers 83.2 FPS, and High holds 63.8 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 48.4 FPS, which sits below the 60 FPS threshold. The step from High to Ultra is the largest drop within this resolution, a loss of 15.4 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a significant additional load on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, none of the presets reach 60 FPS. Low averages 57.1 FPS, which is the closest result at this resolution. Medium drops to 47.8 FPS, High falls to 34.8 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 29.3 FPS. The pattern across all three resolutions is consistent: higher settings reduce frame rates in a roughly linear fashion, but the gap widens as resolution increases.

The database shows no min or max FPS values for this combination, so the analysis relies solely on average performance. The measured data indicates that the most demanding preset at 4K, Ultra at 29.3 FPS, is roughly half the frame rate of the Low preset at 57.1 FPS, illustrating the heavy cost of combining high resolution with high settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Comet Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a RDNA 3.0 GPU with 2048 shading units, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. For a multiplayer title like Fivem, both components contribute, but their relative importance shifts across resolutions.

The scaling between 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 provides the clearest evidence. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 161.6 FPS, while at 1440p Low it drops to 105.3 FPS, a reduction of 56.3 FPS. This large drop indicates that the GPU is already a limiting factor even at lower settings, since resolution scaling primarily stresses the graphics card. The CPU has enough headroom at 1080p to feed the GPU, but the GPU cannot maintain the same throughput when pixel count increases.

The gap between 1440p and 4K reinforces this conclusion. At 1440p High, the average is 63.8 FPS, while at 4K High it falls to 34.8 FPS, a reduction of 29 FPS. The GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth become progressively more strained as resolution climbs. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K because the frame rate is low enough that the processor can easily supply frames; the bottleneck is almost entirely on the graphics side.

The preset scaling also reveals the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 84.5 FPS (from 161.6 down to 77.1), yet the CPU workload in Fivem, a multiplayer game with many entities and scripts, does not change dramatically across presets. The consistent pattern across all three resolutions, where each preset step changes FPS by a similar magnitude, points to the GPU as the primary performance driver in this configuration. The CPU is sufficient for this title, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p, but the RX 7600 determines the ceiling at higher resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS. The recorded average is 77.1 FPS, which clears the threshold by 17.1 FPS. This makes Ultra the recommended setting for 1080p, as it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding option that remains playable. The average is 63.8 FPS, just 3.8 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra falls short at 48.4 FPS, so High is the ceiling for 1440p. Players who prefer a safety margin might consider Medium at 83.2 FPS, but the data confirms High as the best playable preset.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 57.1 FPS, which is 2.9 FPS below the threshold. Medium delivers 47.8 FPS, High produces 34.8 FPS, and Ultra manages 29.3 FPS. The database lists no playable settings for 4K, meaning this combo cannot sustain 60 FPS at any quality level at this resolution. The verdict for 4K is effectively unplayable by the database's standard.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested combinations in the database, this pairing of Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 2573 out of 3707 combos for Fivem. This places it in the lower half of the field, at roughly the 69th percentile from the bottom, or conversely, about 31 percent of tested combos are slower. The rank reflects the CPU's modest position, the GPU sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, and the combination's overall standing is dragged down by the 4K results.

The CPU itself ranks at the 68th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E at 14163 (0.2 percent behind), the Intel Core 7 160UL at 14232 (0.3 percent ahead), the AMD EPYC 7552 at 14115 (0.5 percent behind), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C at 14277 (0.6 percent ahead). These deltas are all within one percent, meaning the i5-10400F's CPU performance is effectively interchangeable with those parts in synthetic tests.

The GPU ranks at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15171. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15199 (0.2 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 15082 (0.6 percent behind), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.7 percent ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at 15063 (0.7 percent behind). The RX 7600 is clearly a stronger component than the CPU relative to their respective populations, but the combo ranking in Fivem is what matters for actual gameplay.

The rank of 2573 out of 3707 suggests that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in Fivem. However, the rank also reflects the fact that Fivem is a multiplayer title where server-side performance and player count can affect results, and the database measurements are taken from real gameplay scenarios. The combo's position is not a reflection of poor hardware quality, but rather its position among a wide field that includes much more powerful CPUs and GPUs.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080?

A: Yes, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold. Low averages 161.6 FPS, Medium averages 126.9 FPS, High averages 103.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 77.1 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440?

A: High is the most demanding playable preset at 1440p, with an average of 63.8 FPS. Ultra drops to 48.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: No, the closest preset at 3840x2160 is Low at 57.1 FPS, which is 2.9 FPS below the playable threshold. No settings at 4K reach 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F scores 14185 on average, with the Intel Xeon 6756E at 14163 (0.2 percent behind), the Intel Core 7 160UL at 14232 (0.3 percent ahead), the AMD EPYC 7552 at 14115 (0.5 percent behind), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C at 14277 (0.6 percent ahead).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171 on average, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15199 (0.2 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 15082 (0.6 percent behind), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (0.7 percent ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at 15063 (0.7 percent behind).

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p Ultra and 1440p High?

A: At 1080p Ultra the average is 77.1 FPS, while at 1440p High it is 63.8 FPS, a difference of 13.3 FPS. Both are playable, but the drop illustrates the cost of higher resolution.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 can run Fivem, but the experience depends entirely on the chosen resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the database verdict lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable, with Ultra as the best setting at 77.1 FPS. This is a fully playable configuration at maximum quality.

At 2560x1440, the verdict lists High, Low, and Medium as playable, with High as the best setting at 63.8 FPS. This is also playable, though the margin above 60 FPS is slim. Players who want more headroom should use Medium at 83.2 FPS or Low at 105.3 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the verdict lists no playable settings. The best result is Low at 57.1 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. This combo is not suitable for 4K gaming in Fivem, regardless of settings. The overall conclusion is that this PC is a solid 1080p machine for Fivem, a capable 1440p machine with settings capped at High, and not a 4K option for this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in the database are all within 0.6 percent of the Intel Core i5-10400F's average benchmark score of 14185. The Intel Xeon 6756E (14163, 0.2 percent behind) would behave nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core 7 160UL (14232, 0.3 percent ahead) offers a marginal improvement. The AMD EPYC 7552 (14115, 0.5 percent behind) and AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (14277, 0.6 percent ahead) round out the group. Any of these processors would deliver similar frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU, since the differences are within the noise of synthetic benchmarks.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are similarly close. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, 0.2 percent ahead) would produce nearly the same FPS at every resolution and preset. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082, 0.6 percent behind) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15063, 0.7 percent behind) would be slightly slower, while the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, 0.7 percent ahead) would be marginally faster. None of these alternatives would change the fundamental verdict: 1080p Ultra is playable, 1440p High is the ceiling, and 4K is not viable.

The data suggests that swapping the CPU or GPU for any of these near-equal parts would yield FPS differences of less than one percent, which is imperceptible in real gameplay. The combo's rank of 2573 out of 3707 is therefore representative of a broad cluster of similar hardware, and the measured FPS values for this specific pairing are a reliable guide for any of these near-identical configurations.