Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 80 | 99 | 126 |
| 1440p QHD | 111 | 143 | 179 | 227 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 218 | 272 | 303 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 presents a striking contrast in performance tiers: a four-core entry-level CPU from the 12th Gen Alder Lake family, benchmarked at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, is matched with a flagship Blackwell 2.0 GPU that sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. According to the measured data, this combination delivers remarkably high frame rates in Fivem, with even the most demanding Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averaging 62 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but begins to show CPU limitations at 1080p, where the average frame rates escalate to 303 FPS on Low settings, suggesting the i3-12100F may be capping the RTX 5080's potential in less demanding scenarios.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Fivem provides a clear picture of how this CPU-GPU pairing scales across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance, starting with a 303 FPS average on Low settings and dropping to 272 FPS on Medium, 218 FPS on High, and 169 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset includes full min and max data, showing a range from 232 FPS minimum to 313 FPS maximum, indicating consistent frame delivery with no severe dips. The jump from Ultra to Low at 1080p is substantial, with a 134 FPS difference, suggesting that the GPU has significant headroom that is being constrained by the CPU's four cores and eight threads.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive but scales down proportionally. Low settings produce a 227 FPS average, Medium drops to 179 FPS (with a 152 FPS minimum and 206 FPS maximum), High averages 143 FPS, and Ultra maintains a solid 111 FPS. The relative gap between presets narrows compared to 1080p, with only a 116 FPS difference between Low and Ultra, indicating that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as pixel count increases. At this resolution, every preset stays well above the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest average being 111 FPS on Ultra, which is nearly double the playable threshold.
At 3840x2160, the performance still impresses given the entry-level CPU pairing. Low settings yield a 126 FPS average, Medium drops to 99 FPS (with an 85 FPS minimum and 114 FPS maximum), High averages 80 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 85 FPS indicates that even in heavy scenes, the system maintains a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that comes close to the playable limit, with its 62 FPS average representing the most demanding scenario tested. The scaling from 1080p to 4K on Ultra shows a 107 FPS drop (from 169 to 62), which is a 63% reduction, reflecting the increased GPU workload at higher resolutions.
The data reveals a consistent pattern: frame rates decrease predictably as resolution and quality settings increase, but the system never falls below the playable threshold in any measured configuration. The min FPS data, available only for Medium presets, shows that the lowest recorded frame rate across all resolution-preset combinations is 85 FPS at 4K Medium, which is still 25 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This suggests strong frame pacing and minimal stuttering, even under load.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution with maximum settings?
A: Yes, the measured data shows the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 62 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and it remains playable, though with a narrow margin.
Q: How does the i3-12100F's CPU performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, placing it in the 68th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 3 N355, scores 13492 (0% delta), while the Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13452 (0.3% higher). The Intel Core 5 120UL is slightly ahead at 13594 (-0.7% delta), and the Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351 (1.1% higher). This indicates the i3-12100F sits in a tight cluster of similarly performing CPUs.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?
A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 111 FPS, making it the best settings option that maintains high performance. Since all presets at this resolution exceed 100 FPS, users can select Ultra without sacrificing playability.
Q: Is the RTX 5080's performance close to its nearest rival GPUs?
A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083 and sits in the 87th percentile. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon 8060S, scores 55757 (0.6% lower), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (0.7% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails at 54828 (2.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads at 57367 (-2.2% delta).
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in Fivem?
A: This CPU-GPU combination ranks 214th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top 5.8% of all configurations tested for this game, which is a strong showing given the entry-level CPU.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the measured average FPS is 218. This is well above the playable threshold and represents a smooth experience for competitive multiplayer gameplay.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, making it the best settings option despite being the highest quality tier. This is the tightest margin in the entire dataset, with only 2 FPS of headroom above the threshold. Users who prefer more stability might consider High settings at 80 FPS, but the data confirms Ultra is technically playable.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 111 FPS, which is nearly double the playable threshold. This allows for maximum quality settings without any performance concerns. The substantial headroom at this resolution means that even the most demanding preset provides a comfortable buffer for frame rate fluctuations, though no min FPS data is available for Ultra to confirm worst-case scenarios.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 169 FPS, offering excellent performance at maximum quality. The data shows that even at 1080p, the system has significant headroom, with the Ultra preset performing at 169 FPS, which is 109 FPS above the playable threshold. This makes 1080p the most forgiving resolution for this combo, allowing users to max out settings without worrying about frame drops. The Medium preset's min FPS of 232 further demonstrates the system's capability at this resolution.
The Verdict
The verdict data clearly indicates that this PC can run Fivem successfully at all tested resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are marked as playable, with the best settings being Ultra at 62 FPS average. This means the system handles 4K gaming, though the margin above the 60 FPS threshold is narrow at maximum settings. At 2560x1440, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 111 FPS, providing a much more comfortable experience. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 169 FPS, offering the highest performance headroom.
The data shows that this combination is playable across the entire range of tested configurations, from 1080p Low at 303 FPS to 4K Ultra at 62 FPS. The only configuration that approaches the playable limit is 4K Ultra, but it still clears the threshold. This suggests that the RTX 5080's immense GPU power compensates for the i3-12100F's modest CPU capabilities, at least in Fivem's multiplayer environment. The verdict by resolution confirms that users can select any preset at any resolution and remain above the 60 FPS playable threshold, making this a versatile system for this game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Examining the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware might behave similarly in this game. For the CPU, the Intel Core i3-12100F's closest competitors include the Intel Core 3 N355 (0% delta, score 13492), the Intel Core i5-9500 (0.3% delta, score 13452), the Intel Core 5 120UL (-0.7% delta, score 13594), and the Intel Core i7-1250U (1.1% delta, score 13351). These CPUs all fall within a 1.1% performance band, meaning users could expect nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem when paired with the RTX 5080.
For the GPU, the RTX 5080's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S (0.6% delta, score 55757), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.7% delta, score 55698), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (2.3% delta, score 54828), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (-2.2% delta, score 57367). These GPUs would produce similar frame rates in Fivem when paired with the i3-12100F, with the RX 9070 GRE being slightly faster and the Pro W5700X slightly slower. The tight clustering of these scores, all within 2.3% of the RTX 5080, suggests that swapping to any of these GPUs would yield nearly identical results in this game.
The combination of a 68th percentile CPU with an 87th percentile GPU creates an imbalanced pairing, but the data shows that in Fivem, the GPU dominates the performance equation at higher resolutions. Users considering alternatives could pair the i3-12100F with a GPU like the RX 9070 GRE for slightly better performance, or the RX 6750 GRE for near-identical results. Similarly, swapping the CPU to a Core i5-9500 would produce minimal changes in frame rates, as the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in most tested configurations.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank in Fivem places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at 214 out of 3707 tested combinations. This puts the configuration in the top 5.8% of all tested combos, which is a strong result given the entry-level nature of the i3-12100F. The rank reflects the RTX 5080's dominant performance, which boosts the combination despite the CPU's modest benchmark scores. The i3-12100F's 68th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the RTX 5080's 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggest that the GPU is the primary driver of this high rank.
The gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles (19 points) indicates a significant performance imbalance, yet the game's measured FPS shows that this imbalance does not prevent high frame rates. The rank of 214 suggests that many other combinations with more balanced components may score better in other games, but in Fivem specifically, this pairing excels. The data indicates that the RTX 5080's raw power compensates for the CPU's limitations, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU workload increases. At 4K Ultra, the 62 FPS average suggests the GPU is nearly fully utilized, while at 1080p Low, the 303 FPS average hints at CPU limitations that prevent even higher frame rates.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 303 FPS on Low, 272 FPS on Medium, 218 FPS on High, and 169 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 134 FPS drop, indicating that GPU workload increases significantly with quality settings. However, the extremely high frame rates at low settings suggest the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at these levels, though the four-core i3-12100F may start to become a bottleneck beyond 300 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 227 FPS on Low, 179 FPS on Medium, 143 FPS on High, and 111 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset shows reductions of 76 FPS (Low), 93 FPS (Medium), 75 FPS (High), and 58 FPS (Ultra). These reductions are primarily due to increased GPU workload from higher pixel counts, demonstrating that the GPU becomes a larger factor at 1440p. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases, since the GPU must process more pixels per frame.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates further drop to 126 FPS on Low, 99 FPS on Medium, 80 FPS on High, and 62 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows reductions of 101 FPS (Low), 80 FPS (Medium), 63 FPS (High), and 49 FPS (Ultra). These larger reductions at lower presets indicate that the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, while the CPU's influence diminishes. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU provides adequate headroom for high frame rates, but the RTX 5080's capabilities are not fully utilized. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, especially at Ultra settings where the 62 FPS average represents the system's maximum sustainable performance. The CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads appear sufficient for Fivem's multiplayer workloads, but the GPU's 10752 shading units and 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth dominate the performance equation at higher resolutions.