Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

67%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
225 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
110 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
73 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
82 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
40 FPS
7ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 29,945

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 40 52 65 82
1440p QHD 73 93 117 148
1080p Full HD 110 142 177 225

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 142
1920x1080 Low 225
1920x1080 Medium 177
1920x1080 Ultra 110
2560x1440 High 93
2560x1440 Low 148
2560x1440 Medium 117
2560x1440 Ultra 73
3840x2160 High 52
3840x2160 Low 82
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 Ultra 40

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti delivers a strong performance profile in Fivem, with measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and presets. The data indicates that this combination is capable of exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold at 1080p and 1440p across all tested settings, while 4K performance is more selective, requiring a reduction in graphical fidelity to maintain smooth gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 3070 Ti and i3-12100F combination produces exceptionally high frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 225, providing a massive headroom above the playability threshold. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 177 FPS, with recorded minimums of 151 and maximums of 204 FPS, indicating consistent frame pacing. High settings yield an average of 142 FPS, while Ultra settings still maintain a very smooth 110 FPS average. This resolution shows the least performance variance between presets, with the gap from Low to Ultra representing a reduction of 115 FPS.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust but shows a more pronounced impact from settings changes. Low settings deliver an average of 148 FPS, which is still nearly two and a half times the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 117 FPS, with a minimum of 99 and maximum of 134 FPS, demonstrating tight frame delivery. High settings average 93 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 73 FPS, which remains comfortably above the playability threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a 75 FPS drop, reflecting the increased GPU load at higher pixel counts.

At 3840x2160, the performance picture changes significantly. Ultra settings produce an average of only 40 FPS, which falls below the playability threshold and would result in a less fluid experience. High settings improve to 52 FPS, still short of 60 FPS. Medium settings reach an average of 65 FPS, with a minimum of 55 and maximum of 75 FPS, making it the highest preset that consistently stays above the threshold. Low settings achieve 82 FPS average, providing the most comfortable 4K experience. The performance spread at 4K is the largest, with Ultra to Low representing a 42 FPS difference, underscoring the resolution's demand on the GPU.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's benchmark scores place it near several alternatives that would produce comparable system behavior. The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, sitting at the 68th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core 3 N355, has an average score of 13492, representing a 0% performance delta, meaning these two processors would deliver virtually identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i5-9500 is 0.3% ahead with a score of 13452, while the Intel Core 5 120UL is 0.7% behind at 13594. The Intel Core i7-1250U trails by 1.1% with a score of 13351. For Fivem, any of these CPUs would yield nearly indistinguishable results when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 29945, ranking in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29928, a 0.1% delta, making it a very close performance match. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095, placing it 0.5% ahead, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783, 0.5% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is the furthest rival at 30433, which is 1.6% higher. In practical terms, these GPUs would all produce similar frame rates in Fivem, with differences of a few FPS at most across the tested resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all presets, with the Low preset hitting 225 FPS. This suggests that the i3-12100F, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, is sufficient to feed the RTX 3070 Ti at this resolution, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor even at Low settings. The 4K results tell a different story, where the GPU's workload becomes dominant. The RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are pushed harder, and the frame rates drop more steeply with each preset increase.

The scaling between resolutions provides insight into the balance. At Ultra settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces the average from 110 to 73 FPS, a 33.6% drop, while moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it further to 40 FPS, a 45.2% drop. This non-linear scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions and settings. Conversely, at Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 34.2% (225 to 148 FPS), and from 1440p to 4K is 44.6% (148 to 82 FPS), showing a similar pattern. The CPU's role is more evident at 1080p Low, where the 225 FPS average approaches the limits of what a 4-core processor can sustain in a multiplayer environment like Fivem, which can be thread-sensitive.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold with significant margin. The Ultra preset averages 110 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra averaging 73 FPS, still comfortably above 60 FPS. The 3840x2160 resolution is more nuanced. The verdict data lists Low and Medium as playable settings, with Medium being the best playable option at an average of 65 FPS. High and Ultra fall short, with averages of 52 and 40 FPS respectively, which would not provide a consistently smooth experience. For 4K gaming, users should stick to Medium or Low presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 110 FPS. This allows for maximum visual fidelity without any performance concerns.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, delivering an average of 73 FPS. This remains above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the optimal setting for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Medium, which produces an average of 65 FPS. This preset offers a balance between visual quality and performance, staying just above the playability threshold. Low settings provide more headroom at 82 FPS, but Medium is the highest preset that meets the 60 FPS requirement.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 40, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings also fail to reach 60 FPS, averaging 52 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494. Its closest rival, the Intel Core 3 N355, scores 13492, a 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-9500 is 0.3% ahead, while the Intel Core 5 120UL is 0.7% behind. These differences are negligible for gaming performance.

Q: What GPU performance is similar to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945 on average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is 0.1% behind at 29928, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 0.5% ahead at 30095. The RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% behind, and the RX 6700 is 1.6% ahead.

Q: Is the frame rate stable at 1080p Medium settings?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 177, with a minimum of 151 and maximum of 204 FPS. This indicates a stable frame delivery with minimal dips.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K?

A: Medium settings at 3840x2160 yield an average of 65 FPS, which is the highest preset above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 82 FPS, but Medium offers better visual quality while remaining playable.