Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

48%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
159 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
78 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
105 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
58 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
9.9ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 18,093

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 37 46 58
1440p QHD 51 66 83 105
1080p Full HD 78 101 126 159

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 101
1920x1080 Low 159
1920x1080 Medium 126
1920x1080 Ultra 78
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Low 105
2560x1440 Medium 83
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Low 58
3840x2160 Medium 46
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination of the Intel Core i3-12100F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER spans three resolutions and four quality presets. The measurements show a clear scaling pattern, with the most demanding settings at 4K falling below the 60 FPS threshold, while 1080p remains playable even at maximum quality.

At 3840x2160, the benchmark results indicate the system struggles with higher presets. Low settings yield an average of 58 FPS, which just misses the 60 FPS target. Medium settings drop to 46 FPS average, with minimum and maximum readings of 39 and 53 FPS respectively. High settings produce 37 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS. None of the 4K presets clear the playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers improve substantially. Low settings deliver 105 FPS average, Medium hits 83 FPS with a range of 70 to 95 FPS, and High reaches 66 FPS average. Ultra settings, however, drop to 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. The data shows that three of the four presets at this resolution are viable for smooth gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the combination performs strongly across the board. Low settings reach 159 FPS average, Medium produces 126 FPS with minimum and maximum of 107 and 145 FPS, High delivers 101 FPS, and Ultra still manages 78 FPS. Every preset at 1080p exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding setting leaving headroom for consistent frame delivery.

The FPS deltas between resolutions follow an expected pattern. Dropping from 4K to 1440p improves the High preset average from 37 to 66 FPS, a gain of 29 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 1080p on High settings adds another 35 FPS, reaching 101. The Low preset scales from 58 FPS at 4K to 105 at 1440p and 159 at 1080p. Medium settings show similar scaling, moving from 46 to 83 to 126 FPS across the three resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database identifies the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. These are the settings that maximize visual quality while preserving a playable frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, which produces 78 FPS average. This is the highest quality preset available, and it clears the 60 FPS target with an 18 FPS margin. The data shows that the system has enough performance headroom at 1080p to run the game at its maximum visual fidelity without compromising smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is High, averaging 66 FPS. This preset provides a solid balance between visual quality and performance. The margin above the 60 FPS threshold is 6 FPS, which is acceptable but leaves less room for demanding scenes. Medium also clears the target at 83 FPS, but High is the most demanding option that stays playable.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The closest is Low at 58 FPS average, which misses the target by 2 FPS. Since the playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, the verdict for 4K is that no settings are recommended for smooth gameplay. Users would need to accept sub-60 performance or drop to a lower resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS on 1920x1080?

A: Yes. All four presets at 1080p exceed the 60 FPS threshold. The lowest average is Ultra at 78 FPS, and Low reaches 159 FPS.

Q: What is the best quality setting at 2560x1440?

A: High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 66 FPS. Ultra falls short at 51 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gameplay possible with this hardware?

A: No. Every 4K preset averages below 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 58 FPS, which misses the threshold by 2 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to nearby alternatives in the database?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093. The nearest rivals include the RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159, which is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18189, which is 0.5% faster.

Q: How does the CPU compare to similar processors?

A: The Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494. The Intel Core 3 N355 scores 13492, a 0% difference, while the Core i5-9500 scores 13452, 0.3% lower.

Q: What is the best overall preset for this system?

A: At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best choice at 78 FPS. At 2560x1440, High is the best at 66 FPS. No preset works at 3840x2160.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database lists comparable hardware based on average benchmark scores. These alternatives would likely deliver similar frame rates in Fivem, assuming other system components remain constant.

For the CPU, the Intel Core i3-12100F sits at 13494 average score. The nearest rival is the Intel Core 3 N355 with a score of 13492, a 0% delta, meaning performance is effectively identical. The Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13452, which is 0.3% lower, a negligible difference. The Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, 0.7% higher, and the Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351, 1.1% lower. These processors would behave within a small margin of the i3-12100F in Fivem, with the Core 5 120UL potentially offering a slight edge and the i7-1250U a minor deficit.

For the GPU, the RTX 2060 SUPER averages 18093. The closest alternative is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159, which is 0.4% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, 0.5% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, which is 1.5% higher, and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, 1.6% higher. These GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, with the Arc A770M offering the largest improvement at under 2%.

The practical implication is that swapping any of these components for the ones in this combo would not meaningfully change the gaming experience. The deltas are all under 2%, which translates to a few FPS at most in demanding scenarios. Users with these alternatives should expect similar playability results at each resolution and preset.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this combination at rank 2581 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This puts it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, meaning roughly 30% of tested configurations perform worse, while about 70% perform better. The percentile position reflects the hardware's capability relative to the full database.

The rank indicates that this combo is not a top-tier performer for Fivem, but it is far from the bottom. The 4K results drag the overall standing down, since no preset reaches 60 FPS at that resolution. The 1440p and 1080p results are more competitive, with multiple playable presets at both resolutions.

Given the database includes many high-end CPUs and GPUs, a rank of 2581 is consistent with a mid-range configuration. The Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor, and the RTX 2060 SUPER is a previous-generation GPU. Both components are capable, but they are not at the top of their respective performance tiers in the database.

The rank also reflects that Fivem is a multiplayer title, which can be sensitive to CPU performance in populated areas. The i3-12100F's 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for the game, but the benchmark data shows that higher-ranked combos likely include more powerful CPUs or newer GPUs.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear. At 1920x1080, this system can run Fivem at 60 FPS or higher on every preset, including Ultra at 78 FPS. This is the recommended resolution for the best experience, as it offers maximum visual quality with smooth performance.

At 2560x1440, the system runs the game at 60 FPS or higher on Low, Medium, and High presets. High is the best playable setting at 66 FPS. Ultra falls short at 51 FPS, so users should avoid it at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot reach 60 FPS on any preset. The closest is Low at 58 FPS, which is below the threshold. Users who want 4K would need to accept lower frame rates or reduce the resolution.

Overall, this combination is suitable for Fivem at 1080p and 1440p. The data shows that 1080p Ultra is the strongest option, delivering 78 FPS average. At 1440p, High is the best choice at 66 FPS. The hardware is not sufficient for 4K gameplay, as even Low settings miss the 60 FPS target by a narrow margin.

The CPU and GPU both sit near their nearest rivals in the database, with performance deltas under 2%. This means the combo is well balanced for the game, with neither component acting as a significant bottleneck at the tested resolutions. The system clears the playable threshold at two of three resolutions, making it a viable option for Fivem players who prioritize 1080p or 1440p gaming.