Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

41%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
280 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
137 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
183 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
90 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
104 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
49 FPS
5.7ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 13,745

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 49 67 78 104
1440p QHD 90 117 144 183
1080p Full HD 137 175 220 280

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 175
1920x1080 Low 280
1920x1080 Medium 220
1920x1080 Ultra 137
2560x1440 High 117
2560x1440 Low 183
2560x1440 Medium 144
2560x1440 Ultra 90
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Low 104
3840x2160 Medium 78
3840x2160 Ultra 49

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a broad spectrum of performance in Fivem, ranging from a demanding 49.2 FPS average at 4K Ultra to a fluid 279.8 FPS average at 1080p Low. Benchmark data indicates this combination is highly capable for most gaming scenarios, though the weakest link emerges at the highest resolution and preset. The measured FPS averages across twelve distinct resolution and settings combinations show a clear pattern: the system scales effectively from esports-level frame rates at 1080p to playable, though not always maximal, performance at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p)

At the most common gaming resolution, the combo produces exceptional headroom. On the Low preset, the average frame rate hits 279.8 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 220.3 FPS, still far above any practical refresh rate ceiling. The High preset yields an average of 175.3 FPS, while the Ultra preset—the most demanding setting tested—still maintains a robust 136.5 FPS average. All four presets at this resolution clear the 60 FPS playability threshold by a substantial margin, with the gap ranging from roughly 76 FPS at Ultra to over 200 FPS at Low.

2560x1440 (1440p)

Stepping up to 1440p introduces more load, but the results remain strong. The Low preset averages 182.9 FPS, which is a drop of approximately 35% from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings follow at 144.1 FPS, while High averages 117 FPS. The Ultra preset, which demands the most from the hardware, still delivers an average of 89.9 FPS. This is the first resolution where the Ultra preset dips below the triple-digit mark, but it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling between Low and Ultra at this resolution is roughly a 51% performance reduction, indicating a significant but expected impact from graphical fidelity settings.

3840x2160 (4K)

At 4K, the system's limits become apparent. The Low preset averages 104 FPS, which is the only preset at this resolution to remain in triple digits. Medium settings produce an average of 78 FPS, while High drops to 67 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to an average of 49.2 FPS, which is the only measured configuration across all resolutions and settings that fails to reach the 60 FPS playability threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 53% performance drop, mirroring the magnitude seen at 1440p, but the absolute numbers are much lower due to the increased pixel count. The High preset at 4K, at 67 FPS, is the best playable setting that still clears the threshold with minimal margin.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have nearby rivals that would produce nearly identical performance characteristics in Fivem. The Intel Core i3-12100F sits at the 68th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13494. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 3 N355, which scores 13492—a delta of 0%. This means the Core 3 N355 would behave practically identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i5-9500 is also very close, scoring 13452, a delta of 0.3% relative to the i3-12100F. On the other side, the Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, a delta of -0.7%, indicating it is marginally slower. The Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351, a delta of 1.1%, showing it is slightly faster. These four rivals represent a narrow band of performance, with less than 2% total variance, meaning any of them would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT sits at the 55th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon 660M, which scores 13812, a delta of -0.5%. This is a surprisingly small gap given the generational difference, but the data places them in the same performance tier. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821, also a delta of -0.5%, placing it essentially equal. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13871, a delta of -0.9%, making it slightly faster. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, a delta of 1.5%, meaning it is marginally slower than the RX 7900 XT. The entire rival set spans less than 2.5% performance difference, so swapping in any of these GPUs would yield nearly identical FPS averages in Fivem, particularly at 1080p where the CPU becomes a larger factor.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence depending on resolution and settings. At 1080p Low, the average frame rate of 279.8 FPS is extraordinarily high, indicating that the CPU is the primary constraint—the GPU has enough headroom to render frames much faster than the processor can feed it. As resolution increases to 1440p Low, the average drops to 182.9 FPS, a 35% reduction. This drop is attributable to the GPU taking on more pixel-rendering work, but the CPU still has ample capacity. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 104 FPS, a 63% reduction from 1080p Low. Here, the GPU is clearly the dominant bottleneck, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K.

The settings preset also plays a role in component loading. At a fixed resolution of 1440p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 182.9 to 89.9, a 51% drop. This scaling is primarily GPU-driven, as higher presets increase shader complexity, texture detail, and post-processing effects. At 1080p, the same Low-to-Ultra transition reduces FPS from 279.8 to 136.5, a 51% drop as well. However, the absolute values suggest that at 1080p Ultra, the CPU still has some influence, as the 136.5 FPS figure is well below what the GPU could theoretically produce if unconstrained. At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes almost entirely; the 49.2 FPS at Ultra is a pure GPU-bound result. The verdict is clear: at 1080p and 1440p, the i3-12100F is sufficient to feed the RX 7900 XT for most presets, but at 4K Ultra, the GPU alone determines the outcome.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader database of tested combinations, this pairing ranks 751 out of 3707 total combos. This places it in the top 20% of all tested systems, which is a strong result given the modest CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank of 751 indicates that while the RX 7900 XT is a powerful graphics card, the i3-12100F's four cores and eight threads limit the system's overall standing. Combos ranked above this pair likely feature higher-core-count CPUs that can better leverage high-end GPUs at lower resolutions, where the CPU becomes the limiting factor. Conversely, combos ranked below this one would include weaker GPUs or substantially older CPUs. The specific rank of 751 out of 3707 suggests that this combination is well-balanced for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU does most of the heavy lifting, but it is not optimized for maximizing 1080p frame rates.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the playable settings vary by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset achieving a 136.5 FPS average. This makes 1080p a fully flexible environment where users can prioritize visual quality or frame rate without compromise. At 2560x1440, the same is true: all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 89.9 FPS, providing a smooth experience with maximum settings. At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Low, Medium, and High presets are all playable, with High averaging 67 FPS as the best visual option that still clears 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K, however, falls short with a 49.2 FPS average, meaning users must choose between dropping to High settings or accepting sub-60 frame rates if they insist on Ultra. The verdict is straightforward: for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this system handles any setting; for 4K gaming, it requires a moderate settings cap to maintain playability.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 60 FPS on 1080p Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra is 136.5, which is more than double the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 4K?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, the High preset averages 67 FPS, making it the best setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra at 4K averages 49.2 FPS and is not playable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, while its closest rival, the Intel Core 3 N355, scores 13492, a delta of 0%. They are effectively identical in performance.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The average FPS drops from 117 at High settings to 89.9 at Ultra, a 23% reduction, which is a GPU-driven scaling pattern.

Q: What GPU rival would perform most similarly to the RX 7900 XT?

A: The AMD Radeon 660M and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile both score within 0.5% of the RX 7900 XT's average benchmark score, making them the closest performance equivalents.

Q: Does this combo rank in the top half of all tested systems?

A: Yes, it ranks 751 out of 3707 combos, placing it in the top 20% of all tested combinations in the database.