Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

61%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
200 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
95 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
66 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
73 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
8ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 26,011

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 48 56 73
1440p QHD 66 79 103 133
1080p Full HD 95 125 161 200

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 125
1920x1080 Low 200
1920x1080 Medium 161
1920x1080 Ultra 95
2560x1440 High 79
2560x1440 Low 133
2560x1440 Medium 103
2560x1440 Ultra 66
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 73
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT deliver a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Fivem, with the data showing that 4K requires dropping to Low settings to stay fluid. The combo ranks 1777th out of 3707 tested configurations, placing it in the upper half of the database. This pairing offers strong single-threaded performance from the CPU and ample graphics throughput from the GPU, making it a balanced choice for most multiplayer sessions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the data reveals a steep performance cliff. With Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 36.6, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings improve this to 55.9 FPS, still short of the target. High settings reach 48.3 FPS, showing that the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution. Only Low settings deliver a playable experience, with an average of 73.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 36.8 FPS, indicating a significant cost for visual fidelity at 4K.

Moving down to 2560x1440, the picture brightens considerably. Low settings produce an average of 132.7 FPS, which is more than double the 4K Low result. Medium settings yield 103.1 FPS, and High settings maintain a strong 79.4 FPS. Even Ultra settings, the most demanding preset, stays above the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 66.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra here shows a drop of 66.6 FPS, but all presets remain fluid.

At 1920x1080, this combo truly shines. Low settings average 199.8 FPS, which is an exceptional result for high-refresh-rate displays. Medium settings deliver 161.1 FPS, and High settings hit 124.8 FPS. Ultra settings, the most demanding preset, still achieves an average of 94.6 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows that at 1080p, even the heaviest preset is more than sufficient, with a difference of 105.2 FPS between Low and Ultra.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the best settings that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 73.4 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution that meets the playability threshold, as both Medium and High fall short. The data indicates that pushing settings higher at 4K will result in a sub-60 FPS experience.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 66.1 FPS. All four presets are playable here, including High at 79.4 FPS, Medium at 103.1 FPS, and Low at 132.7 FPS. The Ultra preset is the best choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

For 1920x1080, the best settings are also Ultra, delivering an average of 94.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset and it stays far above the 60 FPS threshold. There is no need to lower settings at this resolution, as the combo has ample headroom for the highest fidelity.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. From 1920x1080 Ultra (94.6 FPS) to 2560x1440 Ultra (66.1 FPS), there is a 28.5 FPS drop, which is significant. Moving to 3840x2160 Ultra (36.6 FPS) shows another 29.5 FPS decline. This pattern indicates that the RX 6750 XT is heavily taxed as resolution increases, and its 12 GB of memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are pushed to their limits.

Conversely, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low, the average is 199.8 FPS, which is a massive 105.2 FPS higher than at 1080p Ultra. This suggests that the Core i3-12100F, with its 4.30 GHz boost clock and 12 MB L3 cache, is capable of feeding the GPU at high frame rates, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck when settings are lowered. The 3dmark single-thread score of 893 and passmark single-thread score of 3444 indicate that the CPU is strong for a quad-core part, making it less likely to limit frame rates at lower settings.

The difference between 1440p Medium (103.1 FPS) and 1440p Low (132.7 FPS) is 29.6 FPS, while the difference between 4Kp Medium (55.9 FPS) and 4Kp Low (73.4 FPS) is 17.5 FPS. This non-linear scaling suggests that at 1440p, both CPU and GPU are working together, but at 4Kp, the GPU is the primary constraint, as lowering settings has a smaller relative impact. The data points to a balanced pairing at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor at 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals show that the Intel Core i3-12100F is well-positioned. The Intel Core 3 N355 has a nearly identical average score of 13492, with a 0% delta, meaning the two would perform almost exactly the same in Fivem. The Intel Core i5-9500 is also close, with an average score of 13452 and a 0.3% delta, indicating slightly lower but similar performance. The Intel Core 7 1250U offers a 1.1% higher average score of 13594, but the Core i3-12100F is still a strong choice.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals are less direct. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X has a 0.5% lower average score of 25891, which is negligible. The AMD FirePro W7100 and FirePro D700 are also within a 0.6-0.7% delta, but these are workstation cards, not gaming-focused. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, a laptop chip, has a 1.1% higher average score of 25740, but this is a different class of hardware. For Fivem, the RX 6750 XT would be the only one with modern driver support and 12GB of VRAM, making it a more practical option than these rivals.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT able to run Fivem at 1080p?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080, the data shows that all presets, including Ultra, are playable. The Ultra settings average 94.6 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What settings are recommended at 1440p for this combination?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are playable with an average of 66.1 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS, so you can use all settings.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: At 3840x2160, only Low settings exceed 60 FPS, with an average of 73.4 FPS. Higher presets like Medium (55.9 FPS) and High (48.3 FPS) do not meet the playability threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core 3 N355 (13492) and the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core 5 120UL by 0.7%.

How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RX 6750 XT has an average score of 26011, which is 0.5% higher than the Radeon R9 M395X, and 0.6% higher than the FirePro W7100. It is 1.1% ahead of the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, but the latter is a laptop GPU.

What is the best resolution for this hardware?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 is the sweet spot, as it allows Ultra settings at 66.1 FPS. 1080p gives more headroom, but 1440p has the best balance between visual quality and performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global ranking for Fivem, this combo sits at 1777th place out of 3707 tested configurations. This places it in the 48th percentile, meaning roughly half of the tested systems are faster. The ranking reflects a middle-of-the-pack result, which is consistent with the measured FPS data. At 1080p and 1440p, the performance is solid, but the 1080p Ultra score of 94.6 FPS is not top-tier, and the 4K result is a weakness.

The 1777th rank indicates that while this is a capable pairing, there are many systems that deliver higher frame rates, particularly at 4Kp. However, the combo's strength is its consistency across resolutions, offering playable settings at 1440p with Ultra. The data suggests that this is a balanced system for mainstream gaming, but not one that pushes the upper echelons of the performance chart.