Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
154 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
101 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
50 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
10.3ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 54,762
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 44 56
1440p QHD 50 64 80 101
1080p Full HD 75 97 121 154

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Low 154
1920x1080 Medium 121
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 101
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 Ultra 50
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a performance profile that is heavily dependent on resolution and graphics preset, with the data showing a clear divide between 4K and lower resolutions. The benchmark results indicate a system that is extremely capable at 1080p and 1440p, but one that struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 3840x2160. This combination of a high-end 12-core processor with a mid-range graphics card creates a scenario where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strength is more apparent in less demanding settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance, with average frame rates that comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across all tested presets. The Low preset yields an average of 154 FPS, which is exceptionally high and suggests the game is far from being a bottleneck at this resolution. The Medium preset produces an average of 121 FPS, with a minimum of 103 and a maximum of 140 FPS, showing good frame time consistency. The High preset maintains a strong average of 97 FPS, while even the most demanding Ultra preset stays well above 60 FPS with an average of 75 FPS. This data indicates that at 1080p, the combo has significant headroom, allowing users to prioritize visual fidelity without sacrificing smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains playable but the impact of increased resolution becomes evident. The Low preset delivers an average of 101 FPS, which is a notable drop from 1080p but still excellent. The Medium preset averages 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 and a maximum of 92 FPS, keeping the experience fluid. The High preset is the most demanding that still clears the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 64 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls below the playability mark, averaging 50 FPS. The scaling between 1080p and 1440p shows roughly a 35% performance reduction on the High preset, indicating that the GPU is being taxed more heavily as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable performance in all tested presets. The Low preset comes closest, with an average of 56 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset averages 44 FPS, with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 51 FPS, while the High preset drops to an average of 35 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most punishing, averaging only 28 FPS. The data shows a steep decline from 1440p, with the High preset losing nearly half its frame rate when moving to 4K. The min/max figures for the Medium preset at this resolution also reveal a wider variance, suggesting less consistent frame pacing under load.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc B580 combination capable of running Fivem at a playable frame rate?

A: Yes, but only at certain resolutions and settings. The data shows that the combination is playable at 1920x1080 across all tested presets and at 2560x1440 on Low, Medium, and High settings. At 3840x2160, no tested preset achieves an average of 60 FPS, making it unplayable by the standard threshold.

Q: What is the highest graphics preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 75 FPS, which is the most demanding setting tested that remains above the 60 FPS threshold. This shows the combo has enough performance headroom for max settings at this resolution.

Q: How does the frame rate scale between 1080p and 1440p on the High preset?

A: The average frame rate drops from 97 FPS at 1920x1080 to 64 FPS at 2560x1440 on the High preset. This represents a significant 34% reduction in performance, highlighting the increased load on the GPU when moving to a higher resolution.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate achieved is 56 FPS on the Low preset, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall further behind, with averages of 44, 35, and 28 FPS respectively.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for the Medium preset?

A: At 1920x1080, the Medium preset shows a minimum of 103 FPS and a maximum of 140 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same preset records a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 38 FPS and the maximum is 51 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor in this configuration?

A: Based on the data, the GPU appears to be the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU has a high benchmark score, with a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile. The steep performance drops at 1440p and 4K are consistent with a GPU-bound scenario.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which achieves an average of 75 FPS. This is the highest preset tested and it stays comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold, making it the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without compromising frame rate.

For 2560x1440, the best settings are High, which delivers an average of 64 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution. While the Low and Medium presets offer higher frame rates of 101 and 80 FPS respectively, the High preset provides the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.

At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The data shows that no tested preset achieves an average of at least 60 FPS. The closest is the Low preset with an average of 56 FPS, but this still falls short of the playability threshold. Therefore, no settings are recommended for 4K gaming with this combo.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D provide a context for its CPU performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has an average benchmark score of 55093, which is 0.6% lower than the 9900X3D’s score. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, representing a 1.3% deficit. Other close competitors include the Intel Xeon 6505P with a score of 53701, which is 2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-14700F with a score of 53620, also 2.1% lower. These rivals would produce very similar CPU-bound performance in Fivem, meaning users with these processors would likely see comparable frame rates when the GPU is not the limiting factor.

For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP has an average score of 23061, which is 0.2% lower than the B580’s score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, a 0.6% deficit. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, which is 0.7% higher, while the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These GPUs are all extremely close in average benchmark performance, suggesting that in GPU-bound scenarios, such as at 4K resolution, they would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Fivem.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2788 out of 3707 tested combos. This places the system in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum, which is a notable finding given the high-end nature of the CPU. The ranking reflects the overall balance of the system, where the GPU’s mid-range standing pulls the combined performance down despite the CPU’s strong showing. A rank in the 75th percentile of all tested combos indicates that while this system is far from the slowest, a significant number of other hardware pairings achieve better overall results in this game. The data implies that the Arc B580 is the component that limits the combo’s overall standing, as the CPU’s individual percentile is significantly higher.

The Verdict

The benchmark data provides a clear verdict on whether this PC can run Fivem. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four tested presets achieving average frame rates above 60 FPS. The best experience is at the Ultra preset, which averages 75 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on the High preset, which averages 64 FPS, as well as on the lower presets. However, the Ultra preset at this resolution is not playable, averaging 50 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain a playable frame rate on any tested setting. The highest average is 56 FPS on the Low preset, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Therefore, the verdict is that this PC is a solid 1080p and a decent 1440p machine for Fivem, but it is not suitable for 4K gaming.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a shifting balance of power between the CPU and GPU depending on the resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s high performance is more apparent, as the system achieves very high frame rates even on the Ultra preset, with an average of 75 FPS. The minimal performance drop between Low and Ultra presets (154 to 75 FPS) suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at this resolution, and the GPU is the primary constraint as settings increase. However, the CPU’s strength ensures that it is not a bottleneck even at the highest preset.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more dominant. The frame rate on the High preset drops to 64 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold at 50 FPS. This is a clear indication that the Arc B580 is struggling to keep up with the increased pixel load. The CPU, with its high multi-threaded performance and 128 MB of L3 cache, is likely not the limiting factor here, as the frame rate scaling is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. The data suggests that at 1440p, the GPU’s capabilities are the deciding factor for whether a preset is playable.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The frame rates across all presets are low, ranging from 28 FPS on Ultra to 56 FPS on Low. The scaling between presets is steep, but even the lowest settings fail to reach 60 FPS. The CPU’s performance, while strong, cannot compensate for the GPU’s inability to render at 4K resolution. The data implies that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D has ample headroom for this game, and its performance would only be fully utilized if paired with a more powerful GPU. The Arc B580, with its 12 GB of memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, is simply outmatched at 4K, making it the clear limiting factor for this combination.