Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a high-end combination designed to push frame rates in Fivem. Benchmark data indicates this system delivers exceptionally high performance across all tested resolutions and presets, with the Ryzen 9 9900X ranking in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs and the RTX 5080 in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The measured FPS figures show this combo handles the game with significant headroom, making it a strong contender for high-refresh-rate multiplayer gameplay.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on aggregate benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X sits in a tight cluster of high-performance processors. Its average benchmark score of 57498 is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 9015, which scores 57555, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD EPYC 7313 trails by a mere 0.2% with a score of 57399, while the Intel Core i9-14900 leads this group slightly, posting 58115, which is 1.1% higher than the 9900X. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M is 1.4% ahead with a score of 58323. For practical purposes, any of these CPUs would deliver a nearly indistinguishable experience in Fivem, as the performance deltas are all within a couple of percentage points.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080’s average benchmark score of 56083 places it alongside several AMD offerings. The AMD Radeon 8060S is the closest competitor, scoring 55757, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 0.7% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X comes in at 54828, representing a 2.3% gap. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the only rival in this group that outpaces the RTX 5080, scoring 57367, which is 2.2% higher. For Fivem, a user with the RX 9070 GRE would see very similar frame rates, while those with the Radeon 8060S or RX 6750 GRE would experience slightly lower, but still comparable, performance.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3707 tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database, this specific pairing of the Ryzen 9 9900X and RTX 5080 achieves a combo rank of 153. This places it in the top 4.1% of all tested systems, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of configurations. This high ranking is consistent with the individual component percentiles, where the CPU and GPU both sit well above average. The data suggests that this system is positioned for very high-end gaming, though it is not the absolute fastest combination available, as there are 152 other pairings that score higher in Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 354.2. Moving up to Medium, the average drops to 276.6, while High settings produce 219.2 FPS. Even at the most demanding Ultra preset, the average remains very high at 174.7 FPS. This resolution shows that the combo is heavily GPU-bound at lower presets, with the CPU able to feed the graphics card effectively.

At 2560x1440, performance remains extremely strong. The Low preset averages 232.3 FPS, which is a 34.4% decrease from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 185 FPS, a 33.1% reduction from 1080p Medium. High settings see an average of 146.2 FPS, down 33.3% from 1080p High. The Ultra preset averages 113.5 FPS, a 35.0% drop from the 1080p Ultra figure. The consistent scaling across all presets indicates that the performance penalty for moving to 1440p is uniform, regardless of graphical load.

At 3840x2160, the system still maintains playable frame rates, though the demands of 4K are evident. The Low preset averages 125.4 FPS, which is 46.0% lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 104.1 FPS, a 62.4% reduction from 1080p Medium. High settings produce 81.6 FPS, down 62.8% from 1080p High. The Ultra preset averages 64.1 FPS, which is 63.2% lower than the 1080p Ultra figure. The larger percentage drops at 4K, particularly when comparing Medium and High presets, suggest that the RTX 5080’s memory bandwidth and processing power become limiting factors at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the data shows an average FPS of 64.1 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 354.2, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This pairing ranks 153rd out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 4.1% of all systems in the database for Fivem.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at all resolutions and presets?

A: Yes, the lowest average FPS recorded across all tested configurations is 64.1 at 4K Ultra, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average FPS is 219.2, while at 2560x1440 High, it is 146.2, representing a 33.3% decrease in performance.

Q: Which component, CPU or GPU, is more likely to bottleneck at lower resolutions?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS of 354.2 is exceptionally high, suggesting that the CPU is capable of keeping up with the GPU. The performance scaling between presets at this resolution indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor as settings increase.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates a clear pattern: the FPS drops significantly as settings increase from Low to Ultra. The 354.2 FPS at Low drops to 174.7 FPS at Ultra, a 50.7% reduction. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as increasing graphical fidelity directly impacts frame rates. The CPU, with its high single-thread performance, is not the limiting factor at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds, but the overall frame rates are lower. The Low preset averages 232.3 FPS, while Ultra averages 113.5 FPS, a 51.1% reduction. The consistent percentage drop between presets suggests that the GPU is still the dominant constraint at 1440p. The CPU continues to provide enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s role becomes even more pronounced. The Low preset averages 125.4 FPS, while Ultra drops to 64.1 FPS, a 48.9% reduction. However, the absolute frame rates are much lower, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution. The scaling between resolutions is also telling: moving from 1080p Low to 4K Low results in a 64.6% drop in FPS, while moving from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra results in a 63.3% drop. This uniform scaling across resolutions confirms that the GPU is the primary performance driver in Fivem for this system, with the CPU providing consistent support without becoming a limiting factor.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is the Ultra setting. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 174.7 FPS, providing a massive buffer above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings average 113.5 FPS, still well above 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 64.1 FPS, which clears the threshold but with less headroom than lower resolutions. In all cases, the system can run the game at its highest visual quality while maintaining playable frame rates.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Fivem exceptionally well. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with the most demanding Ultra preset averaging 174.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 113.5 FPS, still providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Even at 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 64.1 FPS, which is above the playable threshold. The verdict by resolution confirms that all tested settings at all three resolutions clear 60 FPS. The system is not only capable of running the game but does so with significant performance headroom, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p and 1440p, and fully playable at 4K with maximum settings.