Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
369 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
182 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
241 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
117 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
68 FPS
4.3ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 53,288
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 68 83 105 135
1440p QHD 117 153 192 241
1080p Full HD 182 232 293 369

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 232
1920x1080 Low 369
1920x1080 Medium 293
1920x1080 Ultra 182
2560x1440 High 153
2560x1440 Low 241
2560x1440 Medium 192
2560x1440 Ultra 117
3840x2160 High 83
3840x2160 Low 135
3840x2160 Medium 105
3840x2160 Ultra 68

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, with measured data showing every preset at every resolution tested comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold. This combination ranks in the 89th percentile of 3,707 tested combos, placing it among the top 2.4% of systems evaluated for this game. The data reveals a configuration capable of maxing out visual quality at 4K while still maintaining high refresh rates at lower resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 67.7 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality setting available, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by a margin of 7.7 frames. The High preset at 4K reaches 83.2 FPS, Medium hits 104.8 FPS, and Low runs at 135 FPS, but Ultra remains the optimal choice for image fidelity without sacrificing playability.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 116.6 FPS average, far exceeding the 60 FPS requirement. This resolution offers a substantial performance headroom, allowing players to enable the highest settings while still benefiting from a smooth, high-refresh experience. The High preset at this resolution reaches 152.6 FPS, Medium achieves 191.6 FPS, and Low hits 241 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at an average of 182.4 FPS. This makes 1080p Ultra the best settings choice for competitive play or high-refresh displays, as the frame rate remains well above even 144 Hz monitors. The scaling from Ultra down to Low at this resolution is dramatic: High produces 232.3 FPS, Medium reaches 293.3 FPS, and Low tops out at 368.6 FPS. Across all three resolutions, the playable settings list includes every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — with no configuration falling below the 60 FPS floor.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data shows a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the primary constraint as resolution increases, while the CPU's influence dominates at lower resolutions. Comparing the 3840x2160 Ultra result of 67.7 FPS to the 1920x1080 Ultra result of 182.4 FPS reveals a performance drop of 114.7 FPS, or approximately 63%, when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings. This steep decline indicates that the RTX 4090's rendering workload scales heavily with pixel count.

At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 186.2 FPS (368.6 vs 182.4), showing that the CPU and GPU combination has ample headroom at this resolution, with the GPU still capable of pushing massive frame rates. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows at 2560x1440 to 124.4 FPS (241 vs 116.6), and further narrows at 3840x2160 to 67.3 FPS (135 vs 67.7). This progressive tightening of the performance spread as resolution increases demonstrates the GPU becoming the limiting factor.

The Ryzen 9 7900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, provides sufficient processing power to feed the RTX 4090 at 1080p, where the Low preset reaches 368.6 FPS — a figure that would strain many CPUs. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,093) and multi-thread capabilities (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,300) are adequate to avoid bottlenecking. At 4K, however, the GPU's pixel throughput (443.5 GPixel/s) and memory bandwidth (1.01 TB/s) become the dominant factors, as evidenced by the Ultra preset dropping to 67.7 FPS. The scaling between resolutions at the same preset — for example, Ultra going from 182.4 FPS at 1080p to 116.6 FPS at 1440p to 67.7 FPS at 4K — shows a near-linear relationship with pixel count, confirming GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160: The Ultra preset produces an average of 67.7 FPS. High settings yield 83.2 FPS, Medium reaches 104.8 FPS, and Low achieves 135 FPS. The progression from Ultra to Low represents a 67.3 FPS improvement, indicating that even at 4K, lowering settings provides substantial headroom for higher refresh rates. No minimum or maximum frame time data is available in the measurements, but the averages alone confirm playability across all presets.

2560x1440: Ultra runs at 116.6 FPS average, High at 152.6 FPS, Medium at 191.6 FPS, and Low at 241 FPS. The spread between Ultra and Low here is 124.4 FPS, showing that at 1440p, settings choices have a more pronounced effect on performance than at 4K. The Low preset's 241 FPS result suggests this resolution is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at reduced settings.

1920x1080: Ultra achieves 182.4 FPS, High reaches 232.3 FPS, Medium delivers 293.3 FPS, and Low produces 368.6 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Low preset exceeds 300 FPS, and the Ultra preset still maintains a frame rate suitable for 144 Hz displays. The difference between Medium and Low is 75.3 FPS, while the jump from High to Medium is 61 FPS, showing diminishing returns as settings increase.

Across all resolutions, the data shows no preset falling below 60 FPS. The lowest recorded average is 67.7 FPS at 4K Ultra, which remains 7.7 FPS above the playable threshold. The highest recorded average is 368.6 FPS at 1080p Low, demonstrating the combination's ability to handle even the most demanding frame rate scenarios.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame places this configuration at 89 out of 3,707 tested combinations. This means the Ryzen 9 7900X + RTX 4090 pairing outperforms 3,618 other combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 2.4% of all systems tested. The rank of 89 indicates that only 88 other hardware combinations deliver higher average frame rates across the tested settings and resolutions.

This ranking is consistent with the hardware's individual benchmark positions. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile against all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 53,288, while the GPU ranks in the 88th percentile against all GPUs with an average score of 60,347. The combined ranking of 89 out of 3,707 suggests that the pairing is well-balanced, with neither component dragging down the overall performance in this specific game. The measured FPS data, rather than synthetic benchmarks, confirms that this combo delivers class-leading results in Fivem, particularly at 1440p and 1080p where the frame rates approach or exceed 240 FPS at lower settings. The 4K Ultra result of 67.7 FPS, while playable, is the weakest point in the dataset, yet it still ranks this combo far above the median system.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X provide insight into CPUs that would produce similar frame rates in Fivem. The AMD EPYC 7313P has an average score of 53,206, which is 0.2% lower than the 7900X's 53,288. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620, 0.6% higher, while the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469 (0.3% higher) and the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974 (0.6% lower). These delta percentages are all within 1% of the 7900X, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Fivem, with frame rate differences likely imperceptible.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average score of 60,326, essentially identical to the RTX 4090's 60,347 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896 (2.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (2.9% lower). The RTX 4090's nearest rivals fall within a narrow band of -2.9% to +2.5% of its average benchmark score. In practical terms for Fivem, swapping the RTX 4090 for the Intel Arc Pro A60 would yield virtually identical frame rates, while the Radeon PRO V710 would represent a modest but noticeable performance decrease. It is important to note that these alternatives are based on synthetic benchmark averages, and the actual Fivem performance could vary due to driver optimizations or game-specific quirks not captured in the general scores.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 67.7 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination?

A: All three tested resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) support Ultra settings at playable frame rates. The highest frame rate at Ultra is 182.4 FPS at 1080p, while 4K Ultra yields 67.7 FPS.

Q: How much faster is Low settings compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings achieve 368.6 FPS versus 182.4 FPS for Ultra, representing a 186.2 FPS difference, or roughly double the frame rate.

Q: Does this combo bottleneck at any resolution?

A: The data shows the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K, where Ultra drops to 67.7 FPS, while at 1080p the CPU keeps up with the GPU, as evidenced by the 368.6 FPS Low result.

Q: What is the rank of this combination among tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 89th out of 3,707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 2.4% of all systems evaluated for Fivem.

Q: Are there any settings that fail to reach 60 FPS?

A: No. Every preset at every resolution in the measured data exceeds 60 FPS. The lowest result is 67.7 FPS at 4K Ultra.

The Verdict

This PC can definitively run Fivem, and it does so with substantial performance to spare. The verdict by resolution shows that all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at every resolution tested, with none falling below the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra at 67.7 FPS, which clears the threshold by 7.7 frames. At 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 116.6 FPS, providing near-double the required frame rate. At 1920x1080, Ultra achieves 182.4 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh displays.

The data indicates that this combination is overqualified for Fivem at 1080p, where even Ultra settings produce frame rates well above 144 Hz. At 1440p, the system offers an excellent balance between visual quality and speed, with Ultra settings still reaching 116.6 FPS. At 4K, the system remains fully playable at maximum settings, though the 67.7 FPS result shows the RTX 4090 is being pushed closer to its limits. The Ryzen 9 7900X provides ample CPU headroom, as demonstrated by the 368.6 FPS result at 1080p Low, ensuring that the GPU is the primary driver of performance in most scenarios. For players seeking maximum visual fidelity, the 4K Ultra setting is the recommended choice. For competitive play or high-refresh monitors, 1440p or 1080p with Ultra or High settings offers the best combination of responsiveness and image quality. This system does not require any settings compromises to enjoy Fivem, as every configuration tested exceeds the playability standard.