Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
67 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 53,288
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 31 39 50
1440p QHD 44 56 71 89
1080p Full HD 67 86 107 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 67
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a specific performance profile for Fivem, a multiplayer title with demanding CPU and GPU characteristics. Measured data indicates that this combination ranks 2980th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the lower half of the database. The benchmark results reveal that playable frame rates are heavily dependent on resolution and preset selection, with the system struggling at 4K but showing solid capability at 1440p and 1080p. This analysis breaks down the exact performance metrics, component roles, and comparable alternatives based solely on the measured data.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the data shows no settings preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average frame rate recorded at this resolution is 50 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. The High preset delivers 31 FPS, Medium drops to 39 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 24 FPS. Since none of these meet the minimum playable threshold, the verdict for 4K is that no settings are recommended for smooth gameplay.

For 2560x1440, the playable settings include Low and Medium presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 89 FPS, while Medium reaches 71 FPS with minimum and maximum values of 60 and 81 FPS respectively. The best settings at this resolution are Medium, as it delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining an average above 60 FPS. The High preset at 56 FPS and Ultra at 44 FPS both fall below the threshold, making them non-playable options.

At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS barrier. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 67 FPS, making it the best settings choice for this resolution. High delivers 86 FPS, Medium reaches 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS, and Low peaks at 136 FPS. The Ultra preset provides the highest graphical fidelity while still maintaining an average above 60 FPS, making it the optimal selection for 1080p gaming.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals distinct workload characteristics for this game. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as evidenced by the dramatic frame rate drops when increasing settings. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 yields only 24 FPS, while the Low preset reaches 50 FPS, showing a 26 FPS swing purely from GPU workload changes. The Arc B570’s 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus width are adequate for lower presets but insufficient for high-quality 4K rendering.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward a more even CPU-GPU distribution. The Medium preset achieves 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS, indicating that the Ryzen 9 7900X’s 12 cores and 24 threads can feed the GPU adequately at this resolution. The jump from Low to Medium settings costs 18 FPS, while moving from Medium to High costs 15 FPS, suggesting the GPU handles moderate increases in visual complexity without catastrophic frame drops.

The 1920x1080 results show the CPU having more headroom than the GPU. The Ultra preset at 67 FPS demonstrates that the system can maintain playable frame rates even at maximum settings. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra shows a 23 FPS drop, while 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra drops another 20 FPS, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. The Ryzen 9 7900X’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2617 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1093, ensures the CPU is rarely the limiting factor at any tested resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are 50 FPS on Low, 39 FPS on Medium, 31 FPS on High, and 24 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 33 FPS and maximum of 45 FPS, while the other presets lack min/max data. These numbers indicate that even the lowest settings cannot maintain a consistent 60 FPS experience, with the Low preset’s 50 FPS average falling 10 FPS short of the threshold.

For 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 89 FPS average, Medium achieves 71 FPS with 60 FPS minimum and 81 FPS maximum, High reaches 56 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of exactly 60 FPS confirms that this is the boundary setting for maintaining playable performance. The gap between Low and Medium is 18 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 15 FPS, showing a gradual degradation as settings increase.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces 136 FPS average, Medium hits 107 FPS with 91 FPS minimum and 123 FPS maximum, High reaches 86 FPS, and Ultra achieves 67 FPS. The Ultra preset’s 67 FPS average provides a 7 FPS buffer above the playable threshold. The Medium preset’s minimum of 91 FPS offers substantial headroom, ensuring consistent frame delivery even in demanding multiplayer scenarios. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 69 FPS drop, illustrating the GPU’s sensitivity to preset changes at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2980 out of 3707 places this system in the 19th percentile of all tested combinations for Fivem. This ranking reflects the Arc B570’s position in the GPU hierarchy, as the card’s percentile vs all GPUs is 65, meaning it outperforms 65 percent of tested GPUs. The CPU, however, ranks in the 91st percentile vs all CPUs, showing that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing.

The rank suggests that while the CPU is capable of high-end performance, the GPU limits the overall gaming experience in Fivem. The gap between the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s moderate percentile indicates a bottleneck at the graphics card level for most resolutions and presets. The measured FPS data supports this, as the system cannot achieve playable frame rates at 4K despite the CPU’s strong benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and Passmark multi-thread score of 51406.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in benchmark scores are the AMD EPYC 7313P, which scores 53206 versus the Ryzen 9 7900X’s 53288 average, a 0.2 percent difference. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, placing it 0.3 percent higher, while the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, which is 0.6 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, outperforming the Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6 percent. These alternatives would provide nearly identical CPU performance in Fivem, with the i7-14700F being the closest match for users seeking similar multi-threaded capabilities.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.1 percent below the Arc B570’s 20556 average. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, just 0.1 percent higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a 0.4 percent deficit, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, outperforming by 0.5 percent. These GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, making them suitable alternatives if the Arc B570 is unavailable. The RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750 are particularly close in performance, with delta percentages under 0.2 percent.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows no settings preset at 3840x2160 achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average is 50 FPS on Low settings, with Medium at 39 FPS, High at 31 FPS, and Ultra at 24 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 provide the best balance, achieving an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS. This is the highest quality preset that maintains playable frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288 on average, which is 0.2 percent higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, placing it 0.6 percent above, while the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, 0.6 percent below.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The Arc B570 ranks in the 65th percentile vs all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 91st percentile. At 4K, the GPU cannot maintain 60 FPS even on Low settings, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2617) is not the constraint.

Q: What GPU alternatives provide similar performance?

A: The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, just 0.1 percent higher than the Arc B570. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 0.1 percent lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5 percent higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4 percent lower.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p on Ultra?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 67 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This provides a 7 FPS buffer above the minimum playable frame rate.

The Verdict

This system can run Fivem at 1920x1080 with all presets achieving playable frame rates above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers 67 FPS average, making it the recommended choice for 1080p gaming, while Medium offers 107 FPS and Low reaches 136 FPS for users prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the system supports Low and Medium presets, with Medium providing the best visual quality at 71 FPS average. The High preset at 56 FPS and Ultra at 44 FPS fall short of the 60 FPS threshold, limiting options at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot achieve playable frame rates on any preset. The best result is 50 FPS on Low, which still fails to meet the 60 FPS requirement. For 4K gaming, this combination is not suitable for Fivem. Overall, this PC is recommended for 1080p and 1440p gaming with appropriate settings, but it does not provide a playable experience at 4K.