Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 44 | 54 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 83 | 100 | 130 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 126 | 159 | 200 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a split personality in Fivem: it is a dominant force at 1080p and 1440p, yet struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K with higher presets. The data indicates a clear ceiling based on resolution and settings, making this a versatile but not universal setup.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results show that the RTX 5060 is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 9 5950X provides ample headroom at lower ones. At 1920x1080, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the frame rates scale dramatically with graphical settings. Moving from Low to Ultra at 1080p drops the average FPS from 199.7 to 97.8, a reduction of over half. This steep decline is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance, as the CPU is powerful enough to feed the graphics card at all settings. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017, ensures it is not the constraint here.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly, but the GPU remains the dominant factor. The FPS drops from 130.4 at Low to 64.1 at Ultra, showing a similar scaling pattern to 1080p. The CPU still holds up its end, as even the most demanding preset stays well above 60 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, offering high refresh rates at lower settings and still playable performance at Ultra.
The situation changes at 3840x2160, where the RTX 5060’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus become a significant liability. The FPS drops to 75 at Low, but plummets to 54.4 at Medium and 44.3 at High. The Ultra preset is nearly unplayable at 36.2 FPS. This sharp degradation from Low to Medium suggests that the GPU runs out of memory bandwidth and capacity, overwhelming the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s role is diminished here, as the frame rates are entirely dictated by the graphics card’s inability to handle the pixel count and texture loads.
The scaling between resolutions is telling. At Low settings, the performance drops from 199.7 FPS at 1080p to 130.4 at 1440p and 75 at 4K. This drop-off is more severe than the pixel count increase alone would suggest, pointing to the GPU’s memory subsystem as the key constraint. For presets, the gap between Low and Ultra is consistent at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K the gap becomes a chasm, indicating that the RTX 5060 simply lacks the resources for high-fidelity 4K gaming in Fivem.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested hardware, this combination ranks 1811 out of 3707 combos for Fivem. This places it in the 49th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly half of the configurations tested perform better. While this might sound mediocre, it is important to contextualize this rank. The combo is not a top-tier 4K powerhouse, but its performance at 1440p and 1080p is strong, suggesting the rank is pulled down significantly by the 4K results.
The ranking is likely influenced by the fact that many higher-ranked combos include more powerful GPUs with larger memory pools. The RTX 5060’s 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 26331, indicates it is a mid-range part. The Ryzen 9 5950X, however, is a high-end CPU sitting in the 91st percentile with an average benchmark score of 51947. This pairing of a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU creates a system that excels when CPU-bound but falls short in GPU-heavy scenarios, which is exactly what the measured FPS data shows.
The rank of 1811 out of 3707 is a reflection of this imbalance. It is not a poor performer, but it is not a champion either. For users with high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p monitors, this combo will feel exceptionally fast. For those targeting 4K, the rank will feel justified, as the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher presets.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is bracketed by several Intel and AMD parts with nearly identical average benchmark scores. The Intel Core i9-13900F is 0.4% slower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.2% faster and the AMD EPYC 8124P is 0.3% faster. The Intel Core i7-14700 is 0.7% faster. These deltas are negligible, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU. If you are building a similar system, swapping the 5950X for any of these processors would not change the gaming experience.
For the GPU, the RTX 5060’s nearest rivals are a mixed bag. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% faster, while the AMD Radeon 860M is 0.3% slower, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% slower. These are all within a 2% performance band, so any of these GPUs would produce similar FPS numbers. However, it is importantly the Radeon 860M and MX550 are significantly lower-end parts in terms of their overall capabilities, and their similar average scores in this specific benchmark may not translate to other games. The RX 6750 XT and RX 5700 XT are more direct competitors in terms of raw gaming performance.
In practice, this means that if you already own a Ryzen 9 5950X, upgrading to an i9-13900F or i7-14700 would yield no measurable benefit in Fivem. Similarly, the RTX 5060 sits in a tight performance cluster with the RX 6750 XT, so choosing between them should come down to other factors like driver preferences or feature support, not raw speed.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with High settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 44.3, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset at 4K achieves 75 FPS and is considered playable.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is playable with an average of 64.1 FPS. This is the highest quality setting that stays above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the RX 6750 XT in overall benchmarks?
A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, while the RX 6750 XT scores 26011. This makes the RX 6750 XT 1.2% slower, a difference that is unlikely to be noticeable in actual gameplay.
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the RTX 5060?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU. The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance allows it to keep up easily. At 4K, the GPU is even more clearly the bottleneck, so the CPU does not hinder performance at any resolution.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 158.8. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and offers a smooth experience for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Does this combo rank in the top half of all tested configurations?
A: Yes. It ranks 1811 out of 3707 combos, placing it in the top 49% of all tested systems for Fivem. This is a solid mid-pack ranking, reflecting its strong 1080p/1440p performance but weaker 4K showing.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the system is capable of running the Ultra preset with an average of 97.8 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that stays well above the 60 FPS threshold, and it provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. Lower presets offer even higher frame rates, with Medium at 158.8 FPS and Low at 199.7 FPS, but Ultra is the clear choice for a balanced experience.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains playable with an average of 64.1 FPS. While this is just above the 60 FPS line, it is a stable average that allows for maximum visual fidelity. If you prefer higher frame rates, the High preset delivers 83.4 FPS and the Medium preset hits 100.3 FPS, but Ultra is the best settings choice for image quality.
At 3840x2160, the situation is more restrictive. Only the Low preset achieves a playable average of 75 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 54.4 FPS, and High falls to 44.3 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold. Therefore, Low is the only recommended setting at 4K, as it is the sole preset that meets the playability standard.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem, but the experience depends heavily on your target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is a powerhouse, clearing the 60 FPS threshold at all presets, including Ultra with 97.8 FPS. This makes it an excellent choice for competitive or high-refresh-rate gaming. At 2560x1440, it also performs admirably, with all presets, including Ultra at 64.1 FPS, staying above 60 FPS. This is the resolution where the combo offers the best balance of visual quality and performance.
The verdict is less favorable at 3840x2160. The data shows that only the Low preset is playable, with an average of 75 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Therefore, if you are planning to play Fivem at 4K, this setup will require significant compromises in visual settings. For 1080p and 1440p users, however, this is a highly capable combination that will not disappoint.