Fivem

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded data for Fivem with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Arc B370 shows a clear playability boundary at 1080p. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 63 FPS. Low also clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 80 FPS, but Medium represents the highest visual quality that remains playable. High falls short at 50 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, the database records no playable settings for this combination. The closest result is Low at 53 FPS average, which misses the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. None of these settings reach the playable threshold, so the verdict for 1440p is that this combo cannot sustain 60 FPS at any preset.

At 3840x2160, the situation is worse. Low averages 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. No preset at 4K comes within reach of the 60 FPS target. The data indicates that this hardware combination is effectively a 1080p Medium solution for Fivem, with no headroom for higher resolutions.

The verdict summary in the database confirms this: playable settings exist only at 1920x1080, with Low and Medium qualifying, and Medium selected as the best settings at 63 FPS average. For 1440p and 4K, the playable settings list is empty.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Arc B370 is the dominant constraint in this pairing. The GPU's recorded performance profile places it in the 5th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That is a very low position. The Ryzen 9 5950X, by contrast, sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947 across the full CPU test suite. The CPU is far more capable than the GPU, and the FPS ceilings in Fivem reflect the GPU's limits.

The scaling between resolutions reinforces this. Moving from 1920x1080 Medium at 63 FPS average down to 2560x1440 Medium at 41 FPS average is a 35% drop in frame rate for a resolution increase of roughly 78% in pixel count. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average falls to 23 FPS, another 44% drop from 1440p. These steep declines track the GPU's fill rate and shading capacity, not the CPU's compute power. The Ryzen 9 5950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, and its multi-threaded scores are strong, but those resources are largely idle in this scenario because the GPU cannot feed frames fast enough.

The low preset results show the same pattern. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 80 FPS average. At 1440p Low, it drops to 53 FPS average. At 4K Low, it drops to 29 FPS average. The consistent halving of performance with each major resolution step indicates a GPU-bound workload. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would stay more stable across resolutions at the same settings, since resolution does not change CPU load much. The data shows the opposite: every resolution step cuts FPS substantially, which is the signature of a GPU-limited configuration.

The GPU's memory architecture also plays a role. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, which means its effective memory performance scales with the host platform. This type of memory setup typically limits frame pacing at higher resolutions, and the measured FPS drops are consistent with that limitation. The CPU's dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is shared with the GPU, so at 4K the GPU competes with the CPU for the same memory pool. That contention likely explains why 4K results collapse to 14 to 29 FPS across presets.

In multiplayer scenarios like Fivem, CPU load can spike with many players, but the recorded data does not isolate that variable. What the database shows is that resolution scaling dominates the performance outcome for this combo. The CPU role is secondary: it provides enough headroom that frame rates are never CPU-capped at any of the tested settings. The GPU role is primary: it sets the ceiling at every resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 5950X and the Arc B370 ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. That places it in the bottom 8% of all combinations in the database. The rank reflects the GPU's weak standing more than the CPU's strength. A top-tier CPU paired with a bottom-tier GPU produces a bottom-tier gaming result, and the data confirms that in Fivem specifically.

The GPU's percentile position explains the ranking. At the 5th percentile among all GPUs, the Arc B370 is near the bottom of the performance distribution. The CPU's 91st percentile standing cannot compensate for that. In a game that is heavily GPU-bound at the settings and resolutions tested, the combo rank tracks the GPU's percentile closely. The 3420th place out of 3707 is consistent with a GPU in the 5th percentile.

The in-game verdict reinforces this. The database records playable settings only at 1080p, and even there the best preset is Medium at 63 FPS. For a CPU that ranks in the 91st percentile, this is a severely underwhelming outcome. If the same CPU were paired with a mid-range GPU, the Fivem results would likely be much higher, but the database only measures the actual combination tested. The rank of 3420 is the operative number for this specific pairing.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rivals for both components based on average benchmark scores. For the CPU, the Ryzen 9 5950X's nearest rivals are all within 0.7% of its average score. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.2% lower, the AMD EPYC 8124P is 0.3% lower, the Intel Core i9-13900F is 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core i7-14700 is 0.7% lower. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical Fivem performance when paired with the Arc B370, since the GPU is the bottleneck. Users swapping among these CPUs would see no meaningful difference in frame rates.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are also tightly clustered. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% lower in average score, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% lower, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% higher. These are all older or lower-tier GPUs, and their performance in Fivem would be comparable to the Arc B370. A system with the Ryzen 9 5950X and any of these GPUs would likely land in the same FPS range at each resolution and preset.

The practical implication is that the CPU choice is flexible within this narrow band. Since the GPU is the limiting factor, swapping the 5950X for an i9-13900F or i7-14700 would change almost nothing in Fivem. Similarly, the GPU alternatives would all deliver similar results, meaning this combo's performance class is defined by the GPU tier, not the CPU tier.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded data shows the following averages: Low runs at 80 FPS, Medium at 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72, High at 50 FPS, and Ultra at 39 FPS. This is the only resolution where any preset meets the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium is the best playable preset, and its 63 FPS average includes dips to 54 FPS, which means frame pacing is not perfectly stable but generally stays above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 53 FPS, Medium averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. None of these reach 60 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 35 FPS shows that even the mid-range setting can drop to uncomfortable levels during busy scenes. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 12 FPS, and the gap between Medium and High is 8 FPS, showing diminishing returns as settings increase.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. The 4K results are uniformly poor. The Medium preset's maximum of 26 FPS is lower than the 1440p Low average of 53 FPS, which quantifies how steeply performance collapses at 4K. Even the best 4K preset, Low at 29 FPS, is less than half of the 1080p Medium average.

The min/max data is only recorded for Medium presets across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the range is 54 to 72 FPS, a spread of 18 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 35 to 48 FPS, a spread of 13 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 20 to 26 FPS, a spread of 6 FPS. The narrowing spread at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU is consistently saturated at 4K, leaving little variation, while at 1080p there is more headroom for frame rate swings.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 1080p with 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only on Low and Medium presets. Low averages 80 FPS and Medium averages 63 FPS. High averages 50 FPS and Ultra averages 39 FPS, so those presets do not meet the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p?

A: There is no playable preset at 2560x1440. The best average is Low at 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% lower, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% lower, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% higher. All are within 1.4% of the Arc B370.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this pairing?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. The Ryzen 9 5950X ranks in the 91st percentile among CPUs, while the Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile among GPUs. The FPS drops sharply with each resolution increase, which indicates GPU-bound performance.

Q: What rank does this combo hold in the database for Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the bottom portion of all tested combos.

Q: What is the FPS range for Medium settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the average is 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. The frame rate stays above 60 FPS on average but can dip below it during demanding moments.