Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 53 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 80 | 96 | 124 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 118 | 148 | 190 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a robust Fivem experience, with the data indicating that 1080p and 1440p gaming are entirely viable, while 4K requires significant settings compromises. At 1920x1080, the combination achieves a playable average of 117.5 FPS at High settings and can push to 91.2 FPS at Ultra, making it a strong performer for competitive multiplayer. At 2560x1440, the system maintains 80.1 FPS on High, but drops to 59.5 FPS on Ultra, which falls just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The 3840x2160 resolution is the most demanding, with only Low settings clearing the 60 FPS bar, hitting 69 FPS, while Medium and High dip to 52.9 and 46.1 FPS respectively. The CPU’s 87th percentile standing among all processors and the GPU’s 61st percentile suggest a balanced pairing where the graphics card becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC in Fivem?
A: The best playable experience is at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, achieving an average of 91.2 FPS. This is the highest preset that remains above the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?
A: At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, delivering 69 FPS on average. Medium settings drop to 52.9 FPS, High to 46.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 34.2 FPS, all below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its closest rivals in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, placing it just 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (score 17666) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (score 17588). It sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs.
Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to other processors?
A: The Ryzen 9 5900X ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41376. It is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, which scores 41263 (0.3% difference), and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 at 41208 (0.4% difference).
Q: Is there a significant performance gap between 1440p and 1080p in Fivem?
A: Yes, the data shows a clear scaling pattern. At High settings, moving from 1920x1080 (117.5 FPS) to 2560x1440 (80.1 FPS) represents a 31.9% drop in average frame rate. The gap widens further at 4K, where High settings only achieve 46.1 FPS.
Q: Which component is more critical for Fivem performance at 1440p?
A: The GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 2560x1440. The transition from Medium (95.7 FPS) to Ultra (59.5 FPS) shows a 37.8% performance decrease, indicating that graphics load dominates. The CPU’s high percentile ranking suggests it provides sufficient headroom for the GPU to be the limiting factor.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 9 5900X’s benchmark profile places it in close company with several Intel and AMD mobile processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, with an average score of 41263, is virtually indistinguishable in performance, differing by only 0.3%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215) and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41208) follow within 0.4% of the 5900X’s 41376 average. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is slightly faster at 41576, a 0.5% advantage. For Fivem, these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, though the desktop 5900X’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide more headroom for background tasks common in multiplayer environments.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4060’s average score of 17639 aligns it with older and integrated solutions. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, a negligible 0.2% difference, while the AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics at 17588 is only 0.3% slower. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551) and Pro 460 (17509) round out the nearest rivals, with 0.5% and 0.7% gaps respectively. These comparisons indicate that the RTX 4060’s raw compute is comparable to these older discrete GPUs and modern integrated graphics. However, its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a distinct advantage in texture-heavy titles like Fivem, where memory capacity and bandwidth impact high-resolution performance.
For users seeking similar Fivem performance, a system with an Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and an AMD Radeon 780M would approximate the CPU side but likely fall short in GPU-bound scenarios. The RTX 4060’s nearest rivals all lack its modern feature set, including DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 24 RT cores, which may affect visual fidelity options in Fivem. The data suggests that while benchmark scores are close, real-world gaming performance could vary due to architectural differences, particularly at higher resolutions where the 4060’s dedicated memory interface becomes more important.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Ryzen 9 5900X and RTX 4060 shifts dramatically across resolutions in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates balanced performance with the CPU’s strong single-thread capabilities (3dmark_single_thread score of 941) supporting high frame rates. The jump from Low (189.9 FPS) to Ultra (91.2 FPS) at 1080p shows a 51.9% reduction, indicating that GPU load scales significantly with settings while the CPU maintains adequate throughput. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking ensures it does not bottleneck even at these high frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The performance drop from Low (124 FPS) to Ultra (59.5 FPS) represents a 52% decrease, with the Ultra setting falling below the 60 FPS threshold. The CPU’s 3dmark_16_threads score of 9075 suggests it has ample multi-threaded capacity for Fivem’s multiplayer workloads, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking limits high-end settings. The fact that High settings (80.1 FPS) remain comfortably playable while Ultra (59.5 FPS) does not indicates a steep GPU performance cliff at this resolution.
The 3840x2160 resolution clearly exposes the GPU as the primary bottleneck. Even Medium settings (52.9 FPS) fail to reach 60 FPS, and the gap between Low (69 FPS) and Ultra (34.2 FPS) is a massive 50.4% reduction. The CPU’s performance is largely irrelevant at this resolution, as the RTX 4060’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus struggle with the pixel throughput required. The passmark_g3d score of 19545 for the GPU, which is in the 61st percentile, confirms that it is a mid-range part not designed for 4K gaming. The data shows that Fivem’s performance scaling is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at 4K, while the CPU maintains consistent performance across all presets.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem successfully, but the playable experience depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold across all settings, with Ultra achieving 91.2 FPS, making it fully capable of high-refresh-rate gaming. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High (80.1 FPS), Medium (95.7 FPS), and Low (124 FPS), but Ultra drops to 59.5 FPS, just below the playability threshold. At 3840x2160, only Low settings (69 FPS) are playable; Medium (52.9 FPS), High (46.1 FPS), and Ultra (34.2 FPS) all fall short. The verdict is clear: 1080p and 1440p are the target resolutions for this combination, with 4K limited to low-fidelity settings. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 87th percentile indicates that the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor for higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 9 5900X provides excellent headroom for Fivem’s multiplayer CPU demands.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates show a clear hierarchy: Low settings deliver 189.9 FPS, Medium achieves 148.2 FPS, High reaches 117.5 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 91.2 FPS. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the most demanding setting providing a comfortable margin. The step from Medium to High represents a 20.7% reduction, while High to Ultra is a 22.4% drop, indicating diminishing returns at higher settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same settings pattern emerges but with lower absolute numbers. Low produces 124 FPS, Medium 95.7 FPS, High 80.1 FPS, and Ultra 59.5 FPS. The Ultra setting is the only one that falls below 60 FPS, missing the threshold by just 0.5 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows reductions of 34.7% at Low, 35.4% at Medium, 31.8% at High, and 34.8% at Ultra, demonstrating consistent resolution scaling across all presets.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings achieve 69 FPS, just above the playable threshold, while Medium (52.9 FPS), High (46.1 FPS), and Ultra (34.2 FPS) all fall short. The transition from 1440p to 4K results in reductions of 44.4% at Low, 44.7% at Medium, 42.4% at High, and 42.5% at Ultra. This consistent ~43-45% penalty across all settings highlights the GPU’s memory bandwidth limitations at 4K resolution. The lack of min and max FPS data means the analysis relies solely on average frame rates, but the pattern is clear: this system is not designed for 4K gaming in Fivem.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the best playable settings are Low, which achieves an average of 69 FPS. This is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at 4K, and it does so with a 15% margin. Medium (52.9 FPS), High (46.1 FPS), and Ultra (34.2 FPS) are all below playable levels, so users targeting 4K must accept significant visual compromises to maintain smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the best playable settings are High, delivering 80.1 FPS on average. This represents a strong balance between visual quality and performance, with a 33.5% margin above the 60 FPS threshold. While Medium (95.7 FPS) and Low (124 FPS) offer higher frame rates, High provides the best visual experience that remains comfortably playable. Ultra (59.5 FPS) is not recommended as it falls just below the threshold.
At 1920x1080, the best playable settings are Ultra, achieving 91.2 FPS on average. This is the highest preset available and provides a 52% margin above the 60 FPS threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The system has enough headroom that even the most demanding settings maintain smooth gameplay, with High (117.5 FPS), Medium (148.2 FPS), and Low (189.9 FPS) all offering progressively higher frame rates. For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, Ultra at 1080p is the clear choice, delivering both excellent graphics and playable performance.