Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
67 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 41,376
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 31 39 50
1440p QHD 44 56 71 89
1080p Full HD 67 86 107 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 67
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a mixed picture for Fivem. The data shows a system capable of smooth play at mainstream resolutions, but one that hits a hard ceiling at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to determine exactly where this combo excels and where it falls short.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the data does not show any preset achieving the 60 FPS playable threshold. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is none, as all measured settings fall below this mark. The closest is Low, which averages 50 FPS, but this still misses the target. Medium averages 39 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. Therefore, no settings are recommended for 4K if the goal is smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 71 FPS. This is the optimal choice for 1440p, as it provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Low also clears the bar with 89 FPS average, but Medium offers better visual fidelity while maintaining playability. High averages 56 FPS, just below the target, and Ultra averages 44 FPS, making both unsuitable.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 67 FPS. This makes Ultra the recommended setting for 1080p, as it offers the highest visual quality while still clearing the playable threshold. All other presets also exceed 60 FPS: High averages 86 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS, and Low averages 136 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU has sufficient headroom. This is evident from the scaling between resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 69 FPS (136 FPS vs. 67 FPS), showing a significant performance cost for higher settings. At 2560x1440, this gap narrows to 45 FPS (89 FPS vs. 44 FPS). At 3840x2160, the gap is 26 FPS (50 FPS vs. 24 FPS).

This scaling pattern shows that as resolution increases, the FPS penalty for raising settings becomes relatively smaller. This is a classic sign of GPU limitation: at 4K, the Intel Arc B570 is already saturated, so turning up settings has a less dramatic relative impact. The Ryzen 9 5900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, is likely not the limiting factor at any resolution. The data suggests the CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU at all tested settings, as the FPS drops are consistent with the GPU’s workload increasing.

The role of the CPU is more pronounced at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the high FPS values (136 FPS on Low) indicate that the CPU can generate frames quickly, but the GPU still manages to keep up. At 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes, as the GPU is clearly the constraining component. The system is balanced at 1080p and 1440p, but becomes GPU-bound at 4K. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU and its high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3469) support this interpretation, ensuring that the GPU is not starved of data.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific combination at rank 2980 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This percentile position indicates that while the combo is not at the top of the charts, it is also not at the bottom. The ranking reflects a system that is capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but is held back by the GPU at higher resolutions.

This rank is consistent with the hardware's overall benchmark scores. The Ryzen 9 5900X has a percentile of 87 against all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing processor. The Intel Arc B570 has a percentile of 65 against all GPUs, showing it is a mid-range performer. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU results in a system that is often limited by its graphics card. The rank of 2980 suggests that in the context of Fivem, many other combos with better GPUs achieve higher frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. The combo’s performance is competitive at 1080p, but its rank is dragged down by the 4K results.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals for the GPU, several alternatives would likely produce similar frame rates in Fivem. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile has an average benchmark score that is 0.1% higher than the Intel Arc B570, indicating near-identical performance. Similarly, the Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% lower, meaning it would behave almost exactly the same. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% lower. These GPUs would all place the system in a similar performance bracket, with the CPU remaining the constant high-performance factor.

On the CPU side, the nearest rivals are all mobile processors with similar average scores. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (0.3% higher score), Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (0.4% higher), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (0.4% higher) would all provide comparable CPU performance. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is 0.5% lower. Swapping the Ryzen 9 5900X for any of these would likely not change the FPS in Fivem significantly, as the GPU would still be the limiting factor at most resolutions. For users seeking similar behavior, these combinations would be close substitutes.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The data shows the 1920x1080 Ultra preset achieves an average of 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: The best settings for 2560x1440 is Medium, which delivers an average of 71 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS.

Q: Is Fivem playable at 4K with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average FPS is 50 on Low settings, which is below the playable mark.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 2980 out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 3840x2160. The FPS drops across all settings as resolution increases, while the CPU has high benchmark scores, suggesting it is not the constraint.

Q: What is the average FPS on High settings at 1440p?

A: The average FPS for the 2560x1440 High preset is 56 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The Verdict

The data answers the core question: yes, this PC can run Fivem, but with clear caveats. At 1920x1080, it is fully capable, with all presets clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset achieves 67 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a high-quality experience. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable, with Medium being the best preset at 71 FPS. Low also works at 89 FPS. However, High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain smooth gameplay at any setting, as all presets fall short of the 60 FPS mark. The verdict is that this combo is a solid 1080p and a capable 1440p machine, but it is not suitable for 4K gaming in Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact measured frame rates for each resolution and settings preset.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| 3840x2160 | High | 31 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 50 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 39 | 33 | 45 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 56 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 89 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 71 | 60 | 81 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 44 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 86 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 136 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 107 | 91 | 123 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 67 | - | - |

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The 1080p results are strong, with even Ultra providing a 67 FPS average. The 1440p results are acceptable on Medium, but the High preset’s 56 FPS average indicates a steep drop-off. The 4K results are uniformly poor, with the highest average being 50 FPS on Low. The minimum FPS values for Medium presets (33 at 4K, 60 at 1440p, 91 at 1080p) show that frame pacing is consistent, but the overall averages are what determine playability.