Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 18 | 23 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 26 | 33 | 41 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 39 | 50 | 63 | 80 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. The highest recorded average is 29 FPS at Low settings, which falls well short of playable. Medium reaches 23 FPS, High drops to 18 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 14 FPS. The database shows that even the least demanding preset at 4K leaves the system far below the playability line.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves but still does not reach 60 FPS. Low settings produce 53 FPS, which is the closest result at this resolution, yet it remains 7 FPS short of the target. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. None of these presets can be recommended for smooth gameplay at 1440p.
At 1920x1080, the system finally crosses the threshold. Low settings deliver 80 FPS, and Medium delivers 63 FPS. High drops to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 63 FPS. This is the only resolution where the combination achieves playable performance, and the best settings choice is Medium.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, sits near a cluster of closely matched processors. The nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, which scores 0.3% higher on average. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also trails by 0.4%. On the other side, the Intel Core i7-14650HX leads by 0.5%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same graphics card.
The GPU, Intel Arc B370, occupies a much more isolated position. Its nearest rival is the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% ahead. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails by 1.4%. All four rivals are within roughly 1.5% of the Arc B370, so swapping to any of them would produce essentially the same performance in Fivem. The GPU sits in the 5th percentile among all tested graphics cards, which places it far below the midpoint of the database.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the recorded averages are as follows: Low 29 FPS, Medium 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS, High 18 FPS, and Ultra 14 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one with min/max data, showing a narrow 6 FPS range. The gap between Low and Ultra is 15 FPS, which indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as settings increase.
At 2560x1440, the averages are Low 53 FPS, Medium 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS and maximum of 48 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. The Medium range spans 13 FPS, which is wider than at 4K. The drop from Low to Ultra is 27 FPS, showing a steeper performance curve than at 4K. Even the best preset at this resolution leaves the system 7 FPS short of the target.
At 1920x1080, the averages are Low 80 FPS, Medium 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and maximum of 72 FPS, High 50 FPS, and Ultra 39 FPS. The Medium preset shows an 18 FPS range, which is the widest recorded across all resolutions. The difference between Low and Ultra is 41 FPS, the largest delta in the entire dataset. This pattern indicates that the GPU's limitations become increasingly pronounced as settings climb, even at the lowest resolution.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem, but only under specific conditions. The verdict data shows that at 1920x1080, both Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium being the best choice at 63 FPS average. At 2560x1440, no settings are playable, as the best result is 53 FPS at Low. At 3840x2160, the situation is worse, with the highest average reaching just 29 FPS at Low.
The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, and the system crosses it only at 1080p. Users who want to play at higher resolutions will need to accept sub-60 FPS performance or reduce the resolution. The data does not support any claim of playability at 1440p or 4K, regardless of settings.
The overall ranking reinforces this assessment. The combination ranks 3420th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of the database. This is consistent with the GPU's low percentile standing and indicates that the system is far from a high-performance gaming configuration.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Fivem. At 3840x2160, the frame rate drops from 29 FPS at Low to 14 FPS at Ultra, a 52% reduction. This steep decline as settings increase points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, has ample headroom for the game's multi-player workloads, but the GPU cannot keep pace with the rendering demands at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. The average drops from 53 FPS at Low to 26 FPS at Ultra, a 51% reduction. The scaling between Low and Medium is 12 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 7 FPS. The GPU's performance curve is consistent across resolutions, suggesting that its limitations dominate the frame rate regardless of CPU capability.
At 1920x1080, the picture shifts slightly. The average drops from 80 FPS at Low to 39 FPS at Ultra, a 51% reduction, which mirrors the higher resolutions. However, the absolute numbers are higher, indicating that the CPU is able to feed the GPU more effectively at lower pixel counts. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 941 in 3DMark and 3469 in PassMark single-thread tests provides a solid foundation for the game's logic and physics, but the GPU's 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the limiting factor.
The scaling between resolutions reinforces this analysis. At Low settings, 1080p produces 80 FPS, 1440p produces 53 FPS, and 4K produces 29 FPS. This 2.76x reduction from 1080p to 4K is consistent with the GPU's limited fill rate and memory bandwidth. The GPU uses system shared memory, which further constrains performance at higher resolutions where bandwidth demands increase.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 3420th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 7.7% of all configurations in the database. The ranking reflects the GPU's severe limitations, as the CPU is a high-end part that sits in the 87th percentile among all tested CPUs.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 41376 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with deltas under 1%. The GPU's average score of 1184, however, places it in the 5th percentile among all tested GPUs. This massive discrepancy between CPU and GPU performance explains the low overall ranking. The system is effectively hamstrung by the graphics component, and the CPU's considerable processing power cannot compensate for the GPU's inability to render Fivem at acceptable frame rates.
The combo rank is consistent with the measured FPS data. A system that cannot reach 60 FPS at 1440p in any preset and barely clears it at 1080p Medium will naturally sit near the bottom of a database that includes many more balanced configurations. The rank serves as a quantitative summary of the performance limitations documented in the FPS breakdown.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest recorded average is 29 FPS at Low settings. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. No preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for this system at 1080p?
A: Medium is the best playable preset at 1920x1080, with an average of 63 FPS, a minimum of 54 FPS, and a maximum of 72 FPS. Low settings produce 80 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while staying above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 0.2% higher, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 0.5% higher, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 0.7% higher, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1.4% lower. All are within 1.5% of the Arc B370.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the low frame rates?
A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. Frame rates drop by roughly 51% from Low to Ultra settings at every resolution, while the CPU maintains a high benchmark standing in the 87th percentile. The GPU's 5th percentile ranking and system shared memory configuration severely limit performance.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Low settings?
A: The average at 2560x1440 with Low settings is 53 FPS. This is the best result at this resolution but remains 7 FPS below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does this combination rank among all tested systems in Fivem?
A: The combination ranks 3420th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 7.7% of the database. This low rank is driven by the GPU, which sits at the 5th percentile among all tested graphics cards.