Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
80 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
39 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
53 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
26 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
29 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
14 FPS
20ms Frame Time
30ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 58,386
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 14 18 23 29
1440p QHD 26 33 41 53
1080p Full HD 39 50 63 80

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 50
1920x1080 Low 80
1920x1080 Medium 63
1920x1080 Ultra 39
2560x1440 High 33
2560x1440 Low 53
2560x1440 Medium 41
2560x1440 Ultra 26
3840x2160 High 18
3840x2160 Low 29
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 Ultra 14

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the Intel Arc B370 is an unusual matchup: a desktop CPU with a 92nd percentile benchmark ranking alongside a GPU that sits in the 5th percentile. For Fivem, the recorded measurements show this system can deliver playable frame rates only at 1080p, and only on Low or Medium presets. The data below explains exactly where this combo stands, which component limits performance, and what settings you should choose.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1080p?

A: Yes, but only on Low or Medium settings. Low averages 80 FPS, Medium averages 63 FPS. High and Ultra fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with 50 FPS and 39 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 1080p?

A: Medium is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58386. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900, and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck?

A: The GPU. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 5th percentile. FPS scales strongly with resolution and settings, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation.

Q: How does this combo rank overall?

A: It ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it near the bottom of the database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data makes it clear that the Intel Arc B370 is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D with 8 cores and 16 threads, achieves a strong average benchmark score of 58386 and sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and the Core i9-14900, both within 0.5% of its score. This is a capable processor by any measure.

The GPU, however, is a different story. The Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile. Its nearest rivals are legacy discrete cards like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, all within 0.7% of its performance. With a TDP of 25 W and a system-shared memory interface, this is effectively an integrated-class solution.

The measured FPS confirms the GPU bottleneck. At Low settings, Fivem averages 80 FPS at 1080p, 53 FPS at 1440p, and 29 FPS at 4K. That is a steep drop as resolution increases, which happens when the GPU is saturated. Similarly, at 1080p, raising the preset from Low to Medium to High to Ultra brings the average from 80 to 63 to 50 to 39. The CPU, with its high single-thread and multi-thread scores, is not the constraint here; if it were, FPS would remain more stable across resolution changes. Instead, the GPU's low compute throughput, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, becomes the wall.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table lists every recorded measurement for this combo in Fivem. Min and max values are only available for Medium presets.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 18 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 29 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23 | 20 | 26 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 14 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 33 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 53 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 41 | 35 | 48 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 26 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 50 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 80 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 63 | 54 | 72 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 39 | - | - |

At 4K, no preset comes close to 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 29 FPS, and Ultra drops to 14 FPS. At 1440p, Low reaches 53 FPS, but that is still below the playable threshold. Medium and High are lower, at 41 and 33 FPS respectively. Only at 1080p does the system find usable frame rates: Low at 80 FPS and Medium at 63 FPS. The Medium preset also shows a reasonable frame time range, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS, indicating that even during demanding moments the game stays close to the 60 FPS target.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combos for Fivem, this pairing sits at rank 3420 out of 3707. That means only 287 other combinations perform worse. The rank is heavily dragged down by the GPU. The CPU alone is a strong performer, but the Arc B370's 5th percentile standing pulls the entire system to the bottom of the list.

The delta values against the GPU's nearest rivals are small, but those rivals are themselves ancient or low-end parts. A 0.2% difference from an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 does not suggest any headroom. The CPU's nearest rivals, by contrast, are modern server and desktop chips, and the Ryzen 7 9850X3D trades blows with them within a fraction of a percent. The conclusion is straightforward: the processor is not the problem; the graphics solution is.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? Yes, but with strict limitations. According to the verdict data, playable settings (those at or above 60 FPS average) exist only at 1920x1080, and only for Low and Medium presets. The best playable setting is Medium, which averages 63 FPS. At 2560x1440, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the closest is Low at 53 FPS. At 3840x2160, the best result is 29 FPS on Low, far below playable.

For a smooth experience, you must stay at 1080p. High and Ultra are not viable, with averages of 50 and 39 FPS respectively. The system is adequate for casual multiplayer sessions on Medium, but it will struggle in any scenario that demands higher resolution or more graphical fidelity.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the recommended choice.

  • 1920x1080: Medium is the highest playable preset, with an average of 63 FPS (min 54, max 72). Low also works at 80 FPS, but Medium offers better visual quality while still clearing the threshold.
  • 2560x1440: No preset reaches 60 FPS. The best average is Low at 53 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. There is no recommended preset.
  • 3840x2160: No preset is playable. The highest average is Low at 29 FPS, far from 60 FPS. There is no recommended preset.

If you own this combo, the only reasonable path is to run Fivem at 1080p with Medium settings. The GPU simply does not have the throughput to handle higher resolutions, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.