Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

93%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
199 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
98 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
134 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
66 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
7.8ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 37,943
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 42 56 71
1440p QHD 66 83 104 134
1080p Full HD 98 128 159 199

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 128
1920x1080 Low 199
1920x1080 Medium 159
1920x1080 Ultra 98
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Low 134
2560x1440 Medium 104
2560x1440 Ultra 66
3840x2160 High 42
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data for Fivem on this AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination shows a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 198.8 FPS on Low settings, 158.5 FPS on Medium, 128 FPS on High, and 98 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 100.8 FPS, which indicates that the preset selection has a substantial impact on frame delivery even at the lowest resolution tested.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates drop across every preset. Low settings produce 133.9 FPS, Medium delivers 103.8 FPS, High reaches 83.4 FPS, and Ultra settles at 66.2 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is relatively consistent: Low loses 64.9 FPS, Medium loses 54.7 FPS, High loses 44.6 FPS, and Ultra loses 31.8 FPS. This pattern suggests that lower presets are more resolution-sensitive, while higher presets see diminishing absolute losses when the resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the performance envelope tightens considerably. Low settings maintain 70.6 FPS, Medium drops to 56.1 FPS, High falls to 42.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 33.6 FPS. The 4K data reveals a steep penalty for quality: Ultra at 2160p delivers less than half the frame rate of Low at the same resolution, and the gap between Medium and High at 4K is 13.7 FPS. The minimum and maximum FPS values are not provided in the dataset, so the analysis relies exclusively on average frame rates, which still offer a reliable measure of overall performance headroom.

The full range of measurements shows that this combination is most comfortable at 1080p, where even the most demanding preset clears 60 FPS by 38 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra remains above the 60 FPS threshold with 66.2 FPS, but the margin shrinks to 6.2 FPS. At 4K, only the Low preset stays playable, and even that leaves just 10.6 FPS of headroom above the playability threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1080p Ultra is 98 FPS, which is 38 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest preset available at this resolution and it clears the threshold comfortably.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 3840x2160?

A: The only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 4K is Low, with an average of 70.6 FPS. Medium drops to 56.1 FPS, High to 42.4 FPS, and Ultra to 33.6 FPS, all of which fall below the playable threshold.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 128 FPS at 1920x1080 to 83.4 FPS at 2560x1440, a loss of 44.6 FPS. This represents a 34.8% reduction in average frame rate.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 bottleneck the Ryzen 7 9700X in this game?

A: The data indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and presets. At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate falls to 33.6 FPS, while at 1080p Low it reaches 198.8 FPS, showing that the GPU workload scales heavily with resolution and quality settings.

Q: Is 1440p Ultra a viable option for Fivem with this hardware?

A: Yes, but with a narrow margin. The measured average at 2560x1440 Ultra is 66.2 FPS, which is 6.2 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the only Ultra preset at any resolution that remains playable.

Q: What preset at 4K offers the best balance for staying above 60 FPS?

A: Low is the only playable preset at 3840x2160, delivering 70.6 FPS. Medium falls to 56.1 FPS, which is 3.9 FPS below the threshold, so there is no alternative preset that maintains playability at 4K.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 98 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting available in the test set, and the system has 38 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold. Lower presets offer progressively higher frame rates, but Ultra is the best choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is also Ultra, with an average of 66.2 FPS. This setting sits just 6.2 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving only a narrow safety margin. High settings provide 83.4 FPS and Medium delivers 103.8 FPS, but Ultra remains viable for users who prioritize image quality at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 70.6 FPS. Medium drops to 56.1 FPS, which is 3.9 FPS below the threshold, and High and Ultra fall further to 42.4 FPS and 33.6 FPS respectively. Users at 4K must accept the Low preset to maintain playability, as no other setting clears the 60 FPS bar.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i9-14901E with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 0.1%, the Intel Core 5 211E at 0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 0.4%. These processors have average scores of 37911, 37904, 37829, and 37804 respectively, compared to the Ryzen 7 9700X's average of 37943. All four rivals are within 0.4% of the 9700X's score, meaning that swapping to any of them would produce nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem. The 9700X sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, so these rivals represent the immediate competitive cluster around its performance level.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RTX 5060 include the AMD Radeon 860M with a delta of -0.3%, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at -0.3%, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at -0.8%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT at 1.2%. Their average scores are 26401, 26421, 26553, and 26011 respectively, compared to the RTX 5060's average of 26331. The RX 6750 XT is the only rival that scores higher, with a 1.2% advantage, while the others trail by 0.3% to 0.8%. The RTX 5060 ranks in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, so these alternatives would deliver very similar frame rates in Fivem, with the RX 6750 XT having a marginal edge and the 860M or MX550 being essentially indistinguishable in practice.

The Verdict

The data indicates that this AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination can run Fivem at all three tested resolutions, but with important caveats at 4K. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering 98 FPS and Low reaching 198.8 FPS. This resolution offers the most flexibility, as users can choose any quality setting and remain comfortably above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS on every preset. Ultra averages 66.2 FPS, High reaches 83.4 FPS, Medium delivers 103.8 FPS, and Low achieves 133.9 FPS. The Ultra preset is playable, but the 6.2 FPS margin above the threshold is thin, and users who experience frame drops in busy multiplayer scenarios may prefer High for additional headroom.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset maintains playability, with an average of 70.6 FPS. Medium falls to 56.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, and High and Ultra drop to 42.4 FPS and 33.6 FPS respectively. The verdict across resolutions is clear: 1080p and 1440p are fully playable at all settings, while 4K requires the Low preset to stay above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 7 9700X + RTX 5060 combination ranks 1794 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the upper half of the database. The percentile ranking reflects the balance between the CPU's 86th percentile standing among all CPUs and the GPU's 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The combo rank of 1794 out of 3707 means that roughly 1913 other combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game, while 1793 combinations perform worse.

The ranking suggests that this is a mid-to-upper tier configuration for Fivem. The CPU is relatively strong, ranking in the 86th percentile, but the GPU's 72nd percentile position pulls the overall combination down. The measured frame rates confirm this assessment: the system excels at 1080p, handles 1440p well across all presets, and struggles to maintain high quality settings at 4K. The rank of 1794 out of 3707 is consistent with a setup that prioritizes CPU headroom while the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component matters more for Fivem at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role, as the GPU has ample bandwidth to render frames quickly. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p costs 100.8 FPS (from 198.8 to 98), but even at Ultra the frame rate remains high, suggesting that the CPU can feed the GPU sufficiently at this resolution. The Ryzen 7 9700X, with its 86th percentile ranking and 3DMark single-thread score of 1280, provides strong single-core performance that benefits a multiplayer game like Fivem.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The frame rate at Low drops to 133.9 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 66.2 FPS, showing that the GPU workload increases significantly with resolution. The CPU still keeps up, as evidenced by the 103.8 FPS on Medium, but the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking becomes more relevant. The RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p, but the resolution scaling shows diminishing returns as presets increase.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. The frame rate at Low falls to 70.6 FPS, and at Ultra it drops to 33.6 FPS, a 37 FPS difference between the two extreme presets. The CPU's influence is minimal at this resolution, as the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The RTX 5060's 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity limit its 4K performance, and the data reflects this: only the Low preset stays above 60 FPS. The CPU scaling between resolutions shows that the Ryzen 7 9700X can deliver high frame rates when the GPU is not constrained, but the GPU's performance ceiling at 4K dictates the overall experience.