Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 49 | 62 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 89 | 111 | 141 |
| 1080p Full HD | 105 | 135 | 169 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks in the 1575th position out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the upper half of all tested hardware pairings. This is a measured configuration, meaning the data reflects actual benchmark runs rather than estimates. The combo sits comfortably within the playable range at most settings, though 4K Ultra presents a challenge that pushes the hardware to its limits.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1575 out of 3707 places it in the 42nd percentile of all tested combinations. This positioning indicates a mid-to-upper tier pairing that handles Fivem's demands with room to spare at conventional resolutions. The CPU itself holds an 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This disparity suggests the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card, which becomes relevant when analyzing performance bottlenecks at higher resolutions.
The rank reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is severely mismatched for the game's requirements. Fivem, being a multiplayer modification framework, tends to exhibit variable CPU demands depending on server population and script complexity. The data shows this combo maintains playable frame rates at every resolution except 4K Ultra, where the average dips to 38 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between components. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 109 FPS (214 vs 105), indicating the GPU has substantial headroom and the CPU is feeding frames efficiently. Moving to 2560x1440, the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 72 FPS (141 vs 69), showing the GPU beginning to take on more responsibility. At 3840x2160, the spread tightens further to 40 FPS (78 vs 38), with the GPU now the dominant constraint.
The CPU's strength is evident in the 1080p Low result of 214 FPS, which is a frame rate that many GPU-bound configurations cannot reach regardless of settings. The Ryzen 7 9700X's single-thread performance, reflected in its 3DMark single-thread score of 1280, supports high minimum frame rates in CPU-intensive multiplayer scenarios. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors at 4K, where even Medium settings only achieve 62 FPS average.
Preset scaling at each resolution shows diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1080p, stepping from Low to Medium costs 45 FPS (214 to 169), while Medium to High costs 34 FPS (169 to 135). At 1440p, those same steps cost 30 FPS (141 to 111) and 22 FPS (111 to 89) respectively. At 4K, the steps cost 16 FPS (78 to 62) and 13 FPS (62 to 49). This pattern confirms the GPU becomes progressively more saturated as pixel count rises.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 214 FPS, which is the highest measured value across all configurations. Medium settings average 169 FPS with a minimum of 144 and maximum of 194. High settings reach 135 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 105 FPS. All presets at this resolution exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin.
The 2560x1440 results show continued strength. Low settings average 141 FPS, Medium averages 111 FPS with a range of 94 to 128, High averages 89 FPS, and Ultra maintains 69 FPS. Even the most demanding preset at this resolution stays above the playable threshold, though the margin narrows considerably compared to 1080p.
At 3840x2160, performance becomes more constrained. Low settings average 78 FPS, which is the only preset with substantial headroom. Medium averages 62 FPS with a minimum of 52 and maximum of 71, placing it right at the playable threshold. High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra drops to 38 FPS. The 4K results clearly show the RTX 3070's memory bandwidth and capacity becoming bottlenecks, as the CPU has proven it can deliver far higher frame rates at lower resolutions.
The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium settings, shows the combo maintains reasonable frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the 144 FPS minimum against a 169 average represents a 14.8% drop. At 1440p Medium, the 94 FPS minimum against a 111 average is a 15.3% drop. At 4K Medium, the 52 FPS minimum against a 62 average is a 16.1% drop. These consistent ratios suggest no sudden stuttering or frame time spikes.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i9-14901E with a score of 37911 (0.1% difference), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0.1% difference), the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (0.3% difference), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.4% difference). All four alternatives sit within 0.4% of the Ryzen 7 9700X's average benchmark score of 37943, indicating virtually identical synthetic performance.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with an average score of 17083 (0.7% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17037 (1% difference), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17019 (1.1% difference), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 17468 (-1.5% difference). The RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 17208 places it between these alternatives. The RX 7600 XT represents the most relevant modern comparison, as the other three are either legacy multi-GPU configurations or professional workstation cards.
Users seeking similar Fivem performance could expect the Ryzen 7 9700X plus RX 7600 XT combination to behave nearly identically, given the 0.7% GPU score difference and the CPU's negligible variance from its rivals. The GTX 690, despite its age, posts comparable synthetic scores but may lack modern feature support that Fivem's rendering could leverage.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best playable option, delivering 105 FPS average. This provides substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended configuration for users prioritizing visual quality at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, Ultra remains playable with a 69 FPS average. This is the highest preset available and maintains a 9 FPS margin above the playable threshold. The combination handles 1440p Ultra without requiring compromises.
At 3840x2160, Medium is the best playable preset, averaging 62 FPS. This sits just 2 FPS above the playable threshold, leaving minimal margin for demanding scenes or server-side script load. Low settings at 78 FPS provide more comfortable headroom for users who prefer stability over visual fidelity at 4K.
The verdict data confirms these selections: 1080p and 1440p both support Ultra as the best settings, while 4K caps at Medium. The 4K Medium result of 62 FPS is the only playable preset at that resolution that exceeds the threshold, with High and Ultra falling to 49 and 38 FPS respectively.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run Fivem at 4K?
A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings. Medium averages 62 FPS with a minimum of 52, while Low averages 78 FPS. High and Ultra fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold at 49 and 38 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the best quality setting at 2560x1440?
A: Ultra settings are fully playable at 1440p, averaging 69 FPS. This is the highest preset available and maintains a 9 FPS margin above the playable threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943. Its closest competitors are the Intel Core i9-14901E at 37911 (0.1% lower), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0.1% lower), Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (0.3% lower), and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.4% lower).
Q: What GPU alternatives perform similarly to the RTX 3070?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the closest rival with a score of 17083 versus the RTX 3070's 17208, a 0.7% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 1% difference) and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 1.1% difference) also post similar synthetic scores.
Q: Is 1080p performance sufficient for high refresh rate displays?
A: Yes. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 214 FPS. Medium averages 169 FPS, High averages 135 FPS, and Ultra averages 105 FPS. All presets exceed 100 FPS, supporting high refresh rate monitors.
Q: What frame rates does the combo achieve at 4K Medium?
A: The 4K Medium preset averages 62 FPS with a minimum of 52 and maximum of 71. This is the only 4K preset above the 60 FPS playable threshold besides Low, which averages 78 FPS.