Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
377 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
185 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
248 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
122 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
67 FPS
4.2ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 67 87 109 138
1440p QHD 122 157 196 248
1080p Full HD 185 238 297 377

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 238
1920x1080 Low 377
1920x1080 Medium 297
1920x1080 Ultra 185
2560x1440 High 157
2560x1440 Low 248
2560x1440 Medium 196
2560x1440 Ultra 122
3840x2160 High 87
3840x2160 Low 138
3840x2160 Medium 109
3840x2160 Ultra 67

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a formidable combination for Fivem, as the data shows the system consistently delivers well above the 60 FPS playability threshold across all tested resolutions and presets. The benchmark results indicate a clear performance hierarchy scaling with resolution, where the 1920x1080 Low preset achieves a staggering 377 average FPS, while the most demanding 3840x2160 Ultra preset still maintains a comfortable 67 average FPS. The measured scores place this combo at rank 59 out of 3707 tested combinations, putting it in the top 1.6% of all systems evaluated, which underscores the exceptional capability of this hardware pairing for this particular multiplayer title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of high performance across all settings and resolutions. At 3840x2160, the system delivers an average of 87 FPS on High settings, which represents a substantial 30% improvement over the Ultra preset's 67 average FPS. The Low preset at this resolution pushes performance to 138 average FPS, while the Medium preset lands at 109 average FPS with a minimum of 92 and a maximum of 125, demonstrating a narrow 33 FPS variance that indicates stable frame delivery during typical gameplay.

The 2560x1440 resolution shows even more headroom, with the Low preset reaching 248 average FPS, a figure that is nearly double the 4K Ultra result. Medium settings at this resolution produce 196 average FPS with a minimum of 166 and a maximum of 225, providing a 59 FPS variance range that remains comfortably above the playability threshold. High settings deliver 157 average FPS, while the Ultra preset still manages an impressive 122 average FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS baseline.

The 1920x1080 resolution represents the peak performance envelope for this combination, with every preset delivering results that far exceed what most displays can even refresh. The Low preset achieves a remarkable 377 average FPS, which is the highest recorded value in the entire dataset. Medium settings produce 297 average FPS with a minimum of 253 and a maximum of 342, showing that even the lowest recorded frames in this configuration are over four times the playability threshold. High settings reach 238 average FPS, and Ultra settings still deliver 185 average FPS, with each step down in quality adding roughly 50-80 FPS to the average.

When comparing across resolutions, the scaling is notably efficient. The jump from 1080p Ultra at 185 FPS to 1440p Ultra at 122 FPS represents a 34% reduction, while the further jump to 4K Ultra at 67 FPS represents an additional 45% reduction. This pattern indicates that the RTX 5090 is the dominant factor at higher resolutions, as the GPU workload increases proportionally with pixel count while the CPU overhead remains largely static.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS in 4K with max settings?

A: Yes, the data shows the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 67 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by a margin of 7 frames per second. The verdictByResolution field lists Ultra as the best settings at this resolution with that exact average.

Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for this hardware?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 377 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. However, for a balanced experience, the 2560x1440 Ultra preset at 122 average FPS offers a strong combination of visual quality and performance.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems?

A: The comboRankInGame places this configuration at rank 59 out of 3707 total combinations, meaning it outperforms approximately 98.4% of all tested systems in Fivem.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 bottlenecked by the Ryzen 7 9700F at 1080p?

A: The data suggests CPU influence is more pronounced at 1080p, where the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 192 FPS (377 vs 185). This large spread indicates the CPU is feeding frames faster than the GPU can render at lower settings.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the entire dataset?

A: The lowest recorded minimum FPS is 92 at 3840x2160 Medium settings, which still exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold by 53%. All other minimum values are either null or higher, indicating no configuration drops below playable levels.

Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame delivery across all presets?

A: The Medium preset data shows the tightest variance at each resolution, with a 33 FPS spread at 4K, a 59 FPS spread at 1440p, and an 89 FPS spread at 1080p. This suggests the Medium preset offers the most predictable performance profile.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination achieves a rank of 59 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 1.6% of all configurations. This high standing is particularly notable given that the ranking considers both CPU and GPU contributions, and the data shows that this pairing excels in the CPU-sensitive aspects of Fivem while leveraging the immense GPU headroom of the RTX 5090.

The rank percentile becomes more meaningful when examining the FPS distribution. At 1080p Ultra, the system delivers 185 average FPS, which is nearly three times the playability threshold. This level of performance means the combo is not merely capable of running Fivem, but does so with such headroom that users could enable additional graphical enhancements or run background tasks without impacting playability. The rank of 59 suggests that only 58 other combinations among 3707 produce higher average frame rates, and those are likely to feature even more powerful CPUs or more optimized pairings.

The 4K Ultra result of 67 average FPS places this combo in a unique position where it barely clears the threshold at the highest settings while still ranking very highly overall. This indicates that the ranking is heavily influenced by lower-resolution performance where the CPU plays a larger role, and the Ryzen 7 9700F's strong single-thread capabilities contribute significantly to the high rank.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F provide context for CPU-level performance that would yield similar results in Fivem. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 in average benchmark, which is a 0.2% difference from the 9700F's 69996, making it effectively identical in processing capability. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, a -0.2% delta, also essentially equivalent. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 with a 0.7% delta, while the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 with a 0.9% delta. All four alternatives would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem, with differences of less than 1% translating to perhaps 1-2 FPS at most settings.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605 in average benchmark, a 0.3% delta from the RTX 5090's 79842, making it the closest performance match. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396 with a 0.6% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940 with a 1.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959 with a -1.4% delta, meaning it is slightly faster in pure compute terms. However, these rival GPUs would likely not achieve the same FPS in Fivem due to architectural differences in rasterization efficiency, though the benchmark proximity suggests similar headroom.

For users seeking similar overall performance, a system with a Ryzen 9 7940HX or Core i7-14700KF paired with a GPU in the RTX 5090's performance class would deliver FPS within 1-2 frames of this configuration across all settings and resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals distinct roles for each component in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary constraint, as evidenced by the dramatic spread between Low and Ultra settings. The Low preset achieves 377 FPS, while Ultra drops to 185 FPS, a 51% reduction that reflects the increased draw calls and physics calculations demanded by higher quality settings. The Ryzen 7 9700F's 8 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz are capable of feeding frames at a rate that exceeds the RTX 5090's rendering capacity at lower settings, making the GPU the limiting factor even at 1080p Low.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU workload grows by 78% in pixel count, and the FPS drops accordingly. The Ultra preset falls from 185 to 122 FPS, a 34% reduction that closely tracks the pixel increase, suggesting the GPU is now the dominant constraint. The CPU's role diminishes proportionally, as each frame requires more GPU compute time, giving the processor more headroom to prepare subsequent frames.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes overwhelmingly dominant. The Ultra preset averages 67 FPS, which is 45% lower than the 1440p result, despite the pixel count increasing by 125%. This disproportionate drop indicates that the RTX 5090 is nearing its rendering limits at 4K Ultra, while the CPU still has ample capacity to keep up. The 4K Low preset at 138 FPS versus 1080p Low at 377 FPS shows a 63% reduction, which again reflects the GPU workload increase rather than any CPU limitation.

The data suggests that Fivem's optimization favors strong single-thread CPU performance at lower resolutions, where the Ryzen 7 9700F's 5.50 GHz boost clock and Zen 5 architecture excel. At higher resolutions, the RTX 5090's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth become the determining factors, with the GPU's raw compute power dictating the frame rate ceiling.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at 60 FPS in every tested configuration. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four settings presets at each of the three resolutions—3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080—are marked as playable, meaning they all clear the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 67 FPS, which provides a 7 FPS margin above the playability threshold. This headroom is modest but sufficient, and users who prefer smoother motion can drop to High for 87 FPS or Medium for 109 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution offers the best balance, with Ultra achieving 122 FPS—double the threshold—and every other preset exceeding 157 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver well over 185 FPS, with Low reaching 377 FPS, making this resolution ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.

The verdict is unambiguous: this hardware combination provides a playable experience at maximum settings in 4K, with substantial headroom at lower resolutions. The minimum recorded FPS across the entire dataset is 92 at 4K Medium, which is 53% above the threshold, ensuring that even the most demanding moments in Fivem's multiplayer environment will not dip below playable levels. Users can confidently select any resolution and preset combination knowing that the system will maintain at least 67 average FPS, with the only consideration being whether they prioritize visual fidelity or maximum frame rates.