Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

93%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
201 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
99 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
133 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
65 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
7.9ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 46 58 74
1440p QHD 65 84 105 133
1080p Full HD 99 127 159 201

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 127
1920x1080 Low 201
1920x1080 Medium 159
1920x1080 Ultra 99
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 133
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 Ultra 65
3840x2160 High 46
3840x2160 Low 74
3840x2160 Medium 58
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F sits in a tightly contested performance band. Its average benchmark score of 69,996 places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875) and within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163). The nearest rivals also include the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515 (0.7% slower) and the Intel Core i7-14700K at 69,355 (0.9% slower). In practical terms, any of these four processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios; the delta between the fastest and slowest of the group is under one percent. The 9700F's 8-core/16-thread configuration with Zen 5 architecture and a 5.50 GHz boost clock places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, so users upgrading from older mid-range parts will see a substantial jump in multi-threaded workloads.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, the comparison field is more varied. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26,331 is nearly matched by the AMD Radeon 860M (26,401, 0.3% lower) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26,421, 0.3% lower). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary trails by 0.8% at 26,553, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% behind at 26,011. These delta values are remarkably small, suggesting that in synthetic benchmarks the RTX 5060 performs within a narrow band of these cards. However, the RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with Blackwell 2.0 architecture and 30 RT cores, means its real-world gaming behavior—especially at higher resolutions—may diverge from these near-neighbor results due to memory capacity and driver optimization differences. The GPU sits in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, which is respectable but not class-leading.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $289, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996 in average benchmark score, while the i7-14700KF scores 70,163—a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Intel part is marginally faster. The difference is less than one percent, so in gaming the two are effectively interchangeable.

Q: Is the RTX 5060 faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: Yes, by a small margin. The RTX 5060's average benchmark score is 26,331 versus 26,011 for the RX 6750 XT, a delta of 1.2% in favor of the RTX 5060.

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, achieving an average of 74 FPS. Medium averages 58 FPS, High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 36 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440 for maintaining 60 FPS?

A: Ultra is the best playable setting, delivering an average of 65 FPS. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at 1440p stay above 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Fivem?

A: It ranks 1637 out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the field.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 201 FPS, while Medium averages 159 FPS with a minimum of 135 FPS and a maximum of 183 FPS. High averages 127 FPS, and Ultra averages 99 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the RTX 5060 has ample headroom; even the most demanding preset stays well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with nearly 40 FPS of margin at Ultra.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably but remains strong. Low averages 133 FPS, Medium averages 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 120 FPS. High averages 84 FPS, and Ultra averages 65 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 35-40% across presets, which is consistent with the increased pixel count. Notably, Ultra at 1440p still clears 60 FPS by a narrow 5 FPS margin, making it the boundary case for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. Low averages 74 FPS—the only preset at 4K that meets the playable threshold. Medium averages 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 FPS and a maximum of 67 FPS, meaning it dips below 60 FPS during demanding scenes. High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 36 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Ultra falls from 65 FPS to 36 FPS, a 45% reduction. The 8 GB VRAM capacity of the RTX 5060 likely contributes to this drop, as 4K textures and effects place significant pressure on memory bandwidth and capacity.

The measured FPS data shows a consistent pattern: the combo is comfortably playable at 1080p and 1440p across all presets, but at 4K only the lowest settings achieve the 60 FPS target. The min/max data available only for Medium presets shows reasonable frame pacing—at 1080p Medium, the spread from 135 to 183 FPS indicates a variance of 48 FPS, while at 1440p Medium the spread narrows to 31 FPS (89 to 120), and at 4K Medium it widens slightly to 18 FPS (49 to 67). These ranges suggest that the game's frame time consistency degrades as resolution increases, which is typical for GPU-bound scenarios.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3,707 tested combinations for Fivem, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1,637th. That places it in the 44th percentile of all tested systems—not a top-tier configuration, but far from the bottom. The rank reflects the balance between the Ryzen 7 9700F's strong CPU performance (94th percentile among all CPUs) and the RTX 5060's mid-range GPU standing (72nd percentile among all GPUs). In a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification framework that can be CPU-intensive due to server-side scripting and many concurrent players, the CPU's high single-thread score of 4,691 and multi-thread score of 36,470 likely contribute more to the overall rank than the GPU's raw rasterization performance.

The rank of 1,637 out of 3,707 means more than half of tested configurations outperform this combo. This is expected given the RTX 5060's position in the GPU hierarchy; the CPU is a high-end part, but the GPU is a mainstream offering. For users who prioritize 1080p or 1440p gaming, this rank is adequate, but for those seeking top-tier 4K performance or maximum frame rates, higher-ranked combos would be necessary. The data suggests that the bottleneck in this pairing is the GPU, especially at higher resolutions where the RTX 5060's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus limit its throughput.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 can run Fivem, but the experience depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo clears 60 FPS at all presets, with Ultra averaging 99 FPS—an excellent result that leaves room for high refresh rate monitors. At 2560x1440, all four presets also exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra at 65 FPS being the most demanding playable option. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves the 60 FPS target, averaging 74 FPS; Medium drops to 58 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 36 FPS.

The verdict by resolution is clear: this system is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p across all quality settings, but at 4K users must sacrifice visual fidelity to maintain smooth gameplay. The playable threshold of 60 FPS is met at 4K only on Low, making 4K a compromised experience for this combo. For users with 1080p or 1440p displays, the RTX 5060 provides a solid experience with headroom for future titles. For 4K enthusiasts, this pairing is insufficient at higher presets, and users would need to either lower settings or consider a more powerful GPU.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 74 FPS. This is the only viable option at 4K; Medium averages 58 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold. The 16 FPS gap between Low and Medium suggests that stepping up to Medium would require a GPU with significantly more memory bandwidth and capacity.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, averaging 65 FPS. This is a tight margin—just 5 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold—but it is playable. If users want more headroom, High averages 84 FPS, Medium averages 105 FPS, and Low averages 133 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the optimal balance of visual quality and performance for this combo.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting, averaging 99 FPS. This provides a 39 FPS buffer over the playable threshold, making it a comfortable choice. High averages 127 FPS, Medium averages 159 FPS, and Low averages 201 FPS. At 1080p, users can enable Ultra without concern, and the high frame rates make this resolution ideal for high refresh rate displays.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU's high single-thread performance (4,691 in PassMark single-thread) and multi-thread score (36,470) allow the RTX 5060 to reach its full potential—the 201 FPS at Low settings suggests the GPU is the primary constraint, as the CPU can feed frames fast enough to reach that level. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (201 to 99 FPS, a 50% reduction) is a GPU-side effect, driven by increased shading and texture work.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more dominant. The frame rate drops from 133 FPS at Low to 65 FPS at Ultra, a 51% reduction, which is nearly identical to the 1080p scaling. This indicates that the CPU still has headroom, and the GPU is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 9700F's 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to maintain frame delivery even at the lower frame rates of Ultra settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become severe. The drop from Low (74 FPS) to Ultra (36 FPS) is 51%, consistent with the other resolutions, but the absolute numbers are low. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth of the RTX 5060 are the likely culprits—4K textures and effects exceed the GPU's memory capacity, causing frame rate collapse. The CPU's role at 4K is minimal, as the GPU is clearly the bottleneck; even at Low settings, the GPU cannot exceed 74 FPS, leaving the CPU with significant unused capacity.

The scaling between resolutions at the same preset reinforces this analysis. At Low, performance drops from 201 FPS at 1080p to 133 FPS at 1440p (34% reduction) and then to 74 FPS at 4K (44% reduction from 1440p). At Ultra, the drops are 99 to 65 FPS (34% reduction) and then 65 to 36 FPS (45% reduction). The consistent ~34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~44-45% drop from 1440p to 4K indicates that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the determining factors, with the CPU playing a secondary role. For Fivem specifically, where multiplayer environments can cause CPU spikes, the Ryzen 7 9700F's strong multi-threaded performance provides a stable foundation, but the RTX 5060's mid-range GPU power caps the overall experience at higher resolutions.