Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
331 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
162 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
218 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
59 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 76 95 121
1440p QHD 107 138 172 218
1080p Full HD 162 209 261 331

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 209
1920x1080 Low 331
1920x1080 Medium 261
1920x1080 Ultra 162
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Low 218
2560x1440 Medium 172
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 59

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a high-end combination that delivers playable frame rates across all tested resolutions in Fivem. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: 1080p is overwhelmingly fast, 1440p is excellent, and 4K is playable at most settings, with only the Ultra preset dipping below the 60 FPS threshold. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for the game’s multiplayer workloads.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 331, which is more than five times the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings yield an average of 261 FPS, with a minimum of 222 FPS and a maximum of 301 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 209 FPS, while Ultra still maintains a robust 162 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra is 169 FPS, indicating that even at the highest preset, the hardware is nowhere near its limits.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains very strong, though the scaling shows a predictable decline from 1080p. Low settings produce an average of 218 FPS, while Medium averages 172 FPS with a minimum of 146 and a maximum of 198. High settings deliver 138 FPS, and Ultra still clears the 60 FPS mark comfortably with an average of 107 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 111 FPS, showing that the GPU workload increases significantly at higher presets, but the RTX 4080 SUPER handles it without issue.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes more noticeably. Low settings average 121 FPS, which is still double the playable threshold. Medium settings drop to an average of 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 and a maximum of 110, meaning even the lowest recorded frames stay well above 60 FPS. High settings average 76 FPS, which is playable but leaves less headroom. Ultra settings, however, fall to an average of 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it the only tested configuration that fails to hit the target. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is 62 FPS, a substantial reduction that highlights the GPU’s limits at this resolution.

The pattern across resolutions is consistent: the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p averages around 35-40%, and from 1440p to 4K another 40-45% drop occurs. For example, High settings go from 209 FPS at 1080p to 138 FPS at 1440p, then to 76 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the primary driver of performance scaling, as the CPU’s role remains constant.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals that the GPU is the dominant factor in Fivem’s performance, particularly at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 7 9700F, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample single-thread performance—evidenced by its PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs. However, the FPS scaling between resolutions shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the bottleneck at 4K and even at 1440p with Ultra settings.

At 1080p, the CPU’s capabilities are more apparent. The jump from 331 FPS at Low to 162 FPS at Ultra suggests that while the GPU is still the primary limiter, the CPU can feed it enough frames to reach very high numbers. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s boost clock of 5.50 GHz and Zen 5 architecture contribute to this, but the lack of integrated graphics means all rendering falls on the GPU.

At 1440p, the GPU’s role becomes clearer. The difference between Low and Ultra is 111 FPS, compared to 169 FPS at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is now more heavily loaded. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 816.0 GTexel/s texture rate are being utilized more fully. At 4K, the GPU is definitively the limiting factor: Ultra drops to 59 FPS, while Low still manages 121 FPS. This 62 FPS spread shows that the GPU’s pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s and memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s are stretched at 4K with high settings.

The CPU’s role is less critical at 4K, as the FPS numbers are primarily determined by the GPU’s rendering capabilities. However, the Ryzen 7 9700F’s multi-threaded PassMark score of 36470 and its 0.2% delta from the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX indicate that it won’t hold back the GPU in most scenarios. The data suggests that for this game, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the component to watch, especially when pushing resolution and settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this combination ranks 259th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the top 7% of all configurations. This percentile ranking underscores its capability, though it’s not the absolute top-tier setup—there are 258 combos that perform better, likely featuring faster GPUs like the RTX 4090 or newer generations.

The rank is driven by the GPU’s performance, as the RTX 4080 SUPER sits in the 86th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 54209. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, has an average score of 54247, a mere 0.1% difference, meaning the SUPER variant offers negligible performance gains in synthetic tests. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking further supports the combo’s high placement, but the GPU’s 4K limitations prevent a higher rank.

The data shows that for 1440p and 1080p gaming, this combo is overkill, ranking near the top in terms of playable settings. At 4K, it’s still competitive, but the 59 FPS average at Ultra pulls the overall rank down. A combo with a stronger GPU would likely rank higher, but this pairing is well above the median tested configuration.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU, several alternatives would behave similarly in Fivem. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which has an average benchmark score of 69875, a 0.2% delta from the 9700F’s 69996. This means a system with the Ryzen 9 7940HX and the RTX 4080 SUPER would perform nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios, though the 7940HX is a mobile chip and may not be a direct desktop swap.

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is another near match, with an average score of 70163, just 0.2% higher than the 9700F. A combo using the i7-14700KF would show no meaningful FPS difference in Fivem, as the game is not heavily CPU-threaded. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515, 0.7% delta) and Intel Core i7-14700K (69355, 0.9% delta) are also within 1% of the 9700F’s performance, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 4080 SUPER would produce near-identical frame rates.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the closest alternative, with an average score of 54247 versus the 4080 SUPER’s 54209—a 0.1% difference that translates to no practical FPS change. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, -1.1% delta) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, -2.7% delta) are also within a few percent, but the RX 6750 GRE has only 12 GB of VRAM, which could impact texture-heavy multiplayer sessions. The AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, -2.8% delta) rounds out the list, but its performance is close enough that in Fivem, the differences would be within the margin of error.

For practical purposes, a system with an RTX 4080 (non-SUPER) and any of the listed CPUs would deliver the same experience. The 4080 SUPER’s 0.1% advantage over the 4080 is negligible in real-world gaming, so users with the latter shouldn’t expect any FPS gap.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 59, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 76 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: The data shows that all presets are playable at 2560x1440, but Ultra provides the highest quality with an average of 107 FPS. Low averages 218 FPS, Medium 172 FPS, and High 138 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the standard RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247, a 0.1% difference. In Fivem, this translates to no measurable FPS difference, so performance is effectively identical.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700F a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: Based on the data, the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p, as FPS scales primarily with GPU load. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, so the CPU’s performance is sufficient.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 209, with no minimum or maximum recorded. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves significant headroom for streaming or background tasks.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM on the RTX 4080 SUPER matter for Fivem?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, which is more than sufficient for Fivem at any tested setting. The data doesn’t show VRAM limitations, as even 4K Ultra maintains high frame rates until the GPU’s compute limits are reached.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Fivem, and it does so with authority at most settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low (331 FPS), Medium (261 FPS), High (209 FPS), and Ultra (162 FPS)—clear the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The best settings at 1080p are Ultra, with an average of 162 FPS.

At 2560x1440, every preset is also playable, with Ultra averaging 107 FPS, High at 138 FPS, Medium at 172 FPS, and Low at 218 FPS. The best choice here is Ultra, as it delivers a smooth experience without sacrificing visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. Low (121 FPS), Medium (95 FPS), and High (76 FPS) are all playable, but Ultra falls to 59 FPS, just below the threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which offers a comfortable 76 FPS average. For users who insist on Ultra at 4K, the 59 FPS average is close to playable, but it doesn’t meet the 60 FPS standard.

In summary, this combo is a top-tier choice for Fivem, ranking in the top 7% of tested systems. It excels at 1080p and 1440p, and it handles 4K well with a minor compromise at the highest preset. The data confirms that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the star of the show, with the Ryzen 7 9700F providing solid support without holding back performance.