Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 77 | 96 | 122 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 138 | 173 | 219 |
| 1080p Full HD | 163 | 210 | 263 | 333 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers an exceptional performance profile in Fivem, with benchmark data showing playable frame rates across every tested resolution and preset. The measured results indicate a system that scales efficiently from 1080p to 4K, with the most demanding Ultra settings at 4K landing precisely at the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces staggering frame rates that prioritize high refresh rate displays. The Low preset achieves an average of 333 FPS, a figure that represents the absolute ceiling of the tested configurations. Medium settings deliver an average of 263 FPS, with a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS, showing consistent performance under load. The High preset reaches 210 FPS average, while the demanding Ultra preset still maintains a robust 163 FPS average. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is never constrained by the graphics card, with all four presets remaining far above any playability concern.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high but begin to show the expected scaling from increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 219 FPS, a marginal 34% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce 173 FPS average, with a minimum of 147 and maximum of 199 FPS. High settings reach 138 FPS average, and Ultra settings still deliver a very strong 107 FPS average. The consistency between minimum and maximum frame times at Medium settings indicates stable performance without significant dips.
At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens noticeably as the RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are pushed harder. The Low preset achieves 122 FPS average, which is still highly playable for 4K. Medium settings drop to 96 FPS average, with a minimum of 82 and maximum of 110 FPS. High settings produce 77 FPS average, while the Ultra preset lands at exactly 60 FPS average. This 4K Ultra result is precisely at the playable threshold, indicating that the system can handle maximum visual quality but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which maintains an average of 163 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by a massive margin of 103 FPS. The data shows no reason to reduce quality at this resolution, as even the heaviest configuration provides a triple-digit average frame rate.
For 2560x1440, Ultra settings remain the best choice, delivering an average of 107 FPS. This represents a 43 FPS margin above the playable threshold, confirming that maximum quality is fully viable at this resolution. The 107 FPS average is sufficiently high for smooth gameplay on standard 60 Hz displays and even accommodates higher refresh rate monitors.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 60 FPS, which is exactly at the playable threshold. This makes Ultra the best settings that maintain playability, but the margin is essentially zero. Players who prefer consistency over maximum visual quality might consider High settings at 77 FPS average, which provides a 17 FPS buffer. However, the strict best settings per resolution definition points to Ultra, as it does not fall below 60 FPS average.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates performance in Fivem. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings shows a 34% frame rate reduction, from 333 to 219 FPS. This substantial drop indicates that even at Low settings, the GPU is becoming a limiting factor as resolution increases, since the CPU workload remains constant across resolutions.
The 1440p to 4K transition at Low settings shows a further reduction from 219 to 122 FPS, a 44% decrease. This steeper curve suggests the GPU workload scales superlinearly with pixel count. The RTX 4080's 9728 shading units and 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are being increasingly taxed as resolution rises, while the Ryzen 7 9700F's 8 cores and 16 threads at up to 5.50 GHz boost clock remain underutilized at lower presets.
The preset scaling tells a complementary story. At 4K, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS from 122 to 60, a 51% performance penalty. This is a clear GPU-bound scenario, as the additional shading work, texture sampling, and memory traffic from higher quality settings directly impact the graphics card's throughput. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support provide ample bandwidth for the graphics pipeline, but the rendering load is squarely on the GPU.
At 1080p, the situation reverses. The gap between Low at 333 FPS and Ultra at 163 FPS is 51%, but even the lowest preset produces frame rates that far exceed what most displays can show. The Ultra preset at 1080p likely still leaves the GPU with headroom, and the Ryzen 7 9700F's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4691, becomes more relevant at these high frame rates where CPU draw call processing can become a bottleneck.
The Verdict
The benchmark data conclusively shows that this PC can run Fivem at playable frame rates across every tested configuration. At 3840x2160, all four presets are playable, with Ultra achieving exactly 60 FPS average, High at 77 FPS, Medium at 96 FPS, and Low at 122 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the critical data point, as it demonstrates that maximum visual quality does not sacrifice playability.
At 2560x1440, the system provides a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. Ultra settings run at 107 FPS average, which is 47 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for high refresh rate gaming, as the frame rates are sufficient for 144 Hz displays while maintaining full visual quality.
At 1920x1080, playability is never in question, with even the most demanding Ultra preset producing 163 FPS average. The system is clearly overqualified for 1080p gaming, and the data suggests that users with 1080p displays can enable maximum settings without any performance concerns. The verdict is simple: this combination runs Fivem at or above 60 FPS in every tested scenario.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest settings preset that maintains at least 60 FPS at 3840x2160?
A: The Ultra preset achieves exactly 60 FPS average at 4K, making it the best settings that stay at or above the playable threshold. High settings provide a more comfortable 77 FPS average if additional headroom is desired.
Q: How much faster is the 1080p Low preset compared to 4K Ultra?
A: The 1920x1080 Low preset produces 333 FPS average, which is 273 FPS higher than the 3840x2160 Ultra result of 60 FPS. This represents a 5.55x difference in frame rate between the most and least demanding tested configurations.
Q: Does the RTX 4080 outperform the RTX 4080 SUPER in this game?
A: The benchmark data shows the RTX 4080 has an average score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER is listed as a nearest rival with an average score of 54209, indicating a 0.1% delta. The two cards are effectively tied in overall performance.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate observed in any tested configuration?
A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 82 at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. This minimum frame rate still exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating consistent performance without severe dips.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Core i7-14700KF in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, a delta of -0.2%. The two processors are statistically equivalent in average performance.
Q: Is the 4K Ultra configuration at exactly 60 FPS average considered stable?
A: The data shows the 4K Ultra preset averages 60 FPS, which is precisely at the playable threshold. However, the Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset may have frame time variability that the average does not capture.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 220 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 5.9% of all tested systems. This ranking reflects the combination's ability to maintain high frame rates across all resolutions and presets, with particular strength at 1440p and 1080p where it delivers triple-digit averages even at Ultra settings.
The rank is notable given the CPU's position in the broader market. The Ryzen 7 9700F sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 0.2% higher average score, the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 0.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 0.7% higher. The GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with the RTX 4080 SUPER just 0.1% higher in average score.
The combination's rank of 220 suggests that while both components are individually strong, their pairing in Fivem does not reach the absolute top of the tested pool. This is likely due to the game's engine characteristics rather than any weakness in the components themselves. The 4K Ultra result of exactly 60 FPS average, while playable, leaves no margin for fluctuation, and systems ranked higher may maintain higher minimum frame rates or better frame pacing in demanding scenes. Nevertheless, a top 6% ranking indicates that this system outperforms the vast majority of tested configurations in Fivem.