Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Fivem with the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc B370 shows a clear pattern of performance that scales predictably with resolution and preset level. At 4K (3840x2160), the combination struggles across all settings. High preset yields an average of 18 FPS, Low reaches 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and maximum of 26, and Ultra drops to 14 FPS. None of these figures approach the 60 FPS playable threshold, and the range between Low and Ultra represents a 15 FPS swing, indicating the GPU is the dominant constraint at this resolution.

Moving to 1440p (2560x1440), the results improve but remain below playable levels. High preset averages 33 FPS, Low reaches 53 FPS, Medium averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 and maximum of 48, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 27 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 4K gap. The Medium preset's minimum of 35 FPS shows that even momentary dips stay well under the 60 FPS target, reinforcing that this resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay with this hardware pairing.

At 1080p (1920x1080), the picture changes significantly. High preset averages 50 FPS, Low reaches 80 FPS, Medium averages 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 72, and Ultra averages 39 FPS. This is the only resolution where any preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low and Medium both exceed 60 FPS on average, with Medium providing a 63 FPS average and a minimum of 54 FPS. High falls short at 50 FPS, and Ultra is far behind at 39 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 1080p is substantial: Low improves from 53 to 80 FPS (a 27 FPS gain), Medium from 41 to 63 FPS (a 22 FPS gain), and High from 33 to 50 FPS (a 17 FPS gain).

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest recorded average is 29 FPS on Low settings, with Ultra dropping to 14 FPS. No preset at this resolution meets the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1080p?

A: The database lists Medium as the best playable setting at 1920x1080, with an average of 63 FPS. Low also qualifies with 80 FPS average, but Medium offers higher visual quality while still clearing 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Medium preset at 1080p compare to High at the same resolution?

A: Medium averages 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 72, while High averages 50 FPS. The difference is 13 FPS in favor of Medium, making High insufficient for a stable 60 FPS experience.

Q: Are there any playable settings at 1440p?

A: No. The best average at 2560x1440 is 53 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS.

Q: What is the lowest recorded FPS across all measurements?

A: The lowest average is 14 FPS at 3840x2160 on Ultra settings. The lowest minimum value recorded is 20 FPS at 3840x2160 on Medium settings.

Q: Does the 1080p Medium preset stay above 60 FPS consistently?

A: The average is 63 FPS, but the minimum recorded is 54 FPS. This means the frame rate dips below 60 FPS at times, though the average remains above the threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a stark division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the Intel Arc B370. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, base clock of 4.20 GHz, boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache. It scores in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33079. The GPU, by contrast, sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 1184, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184. This massive gap in relative standing explains why the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

Resolution scaling is the clearest indicator of GPU dominance. From 1080p to 1440p, the Medium preset drops from 63 to 41 FPS, a 35% reduction. From 1440p to 4K, Medium drops further to 23 FPS, another 44% reduction. These steep declines with increasing pixel count are characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3dmark single thread score of 959, Cinebench R23 single core score of 1713) is more than sufficient for Fivem's workload at lower resolutions, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's limited fill rate and shading power.

At 1080p, the CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by the 80 FPS average on Low settings. This suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at this resolution. However, the gap between Low (80 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) at 1080p is 41 FPS, which points to the GPU struggling with higher preset demands even at the lowest resolution. The GPU's architecture, Xe3-LPG on a 3 nm process, has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, but its FP32 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s are modest figures that limit high-resolution performance.

The verdict is clear: the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is not the bottleneck in any scenario tested. Its 16 threads and 96 MB L3 cache provide ample processing power for Fivem's multiplayer environments. The Intel Arc B370, with its system-shared memory and 25 W TDP, is the component that determines playability. The recorded data shows that preset changes have a larger impact on FPS than resolution changes at the same preset, which further confirms that the GPU's shading and texture units are the limiting resource.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded measurements, this PC can run Fivem at 1080p with playable performance on Low and Medium settings. The verdict by resolution is explicit: at 1920x1080, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best option at 63 FPS average. At 2560x1440, no settings are playable, as even Low only reaches 53 FPS. At 3840x2160, no settings are playable, with the best average being 29 FPS on Low.

The 60 FPS playable threshold is met at 1080p Medium with an average of 63 FPS, but the minimum of 54 FPS indicates occasional dips below the target. For a strictly consistent 60 FPS experience, Low at 80 FPS average provides more headroom. High at 1080p averages 50 FPS, which is below the threshold and not recommended for smooth gameplay. Ultra at 1080p averages 39 FPS, making it unsuitable.

For users who prioritize visual quality, 1080p Medium is the highest preset that clears 60 FPS on average. There is no playable configuration at 1440p or 4K, meaning the system is effectively a 1080p gaming machine for Fivem. The CPU is more than capable for this game, but the GPU's performance ceiling prevents higher resolution play.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the GPU provide context for its performance level. The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, a delta of -0.2%, meaning it performs nearly identically. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a delta of -0.5%, also essentially equivalent. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, a delta of -0.7%, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, a delta of 1.4%. These four GPUs would all deliver similar frame rates in Fivem, meaning any of them would produce the same sub-60 FPS results at 1440p and 4K, and the same playable 1080p Low/Medium performance.

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's nearest rivals are clustered closely. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i7-13650HX also scores 33089, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, a delta of -0.4%. All four CPUs are within 0.4% of the 7800X3D in average benchmark score, meaning any of them would provide equivalent CPU performance in Fivem. Since the CPU is not the bottleneck, swapping to any of these rivals would not change the playable resolutions or presets.

The implication is that the system's performance profile is dictated almost entirely by the GPU tier. Users with any of these rival CPUs paired with the Arc B370 would see identical FPS numbers. Conversely, pairing the 7800X3D with a stronger GPU would be necessary to unlock 1440p or 4K playability.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, there is no best setting because no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average is 29 FPS on Low, which is far below playable. At 2560x1440, the same situation applies: no preset reaches 60 FPS, with Low at 53 FPS being the closest. The database confirms this by listing no playable settings and no best settings for these resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Medium, which delivers an average of 63 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS on average. Low also qualifies with 80 FPS, but Medium provides better visual quality while still clearing the threshold. The Medium preset's minimum of 54 FPS means there are occasional dips, but the average is solidly above 60 FPS. For users who want maximum visual fidelity, Ultra is not viable at 39 FPS, and High falls short at 50 FPS.

The recommended configuration for this system is 1080p with Medium settings. This yields the best balance of visual quality and playability. Users who require a strict 60 FPS minimum at all times might prefer Low, which averages 80 FPS and provides more buffer against frame drops.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 8% of all combinations in the database. The rank reflects the severe GPU limitation: the CPU is a top-tier processor, but the GPU's 5th percentile standing drags the overall combo down.

For context, the CPU alone ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 5th percentile among all GPUs. The combination rank of 3420 out of 3707 shows that the GPU's weakness dominates the overall performance in this game. In Fivem, which is a multiplayer title with CPU-intensive server-side simulation, one might expect the CPU to matter more. However, the recorded data shows that the GPU is the binding constraint at all resolutions above 1080p, and even at 1080p, the GPU limits the preset level to Medium.

The rank suggests that most other tested combinations perform better in Fivem. This is expected, given the GPU's low benchmark scores. For users considering this build, the CPU is future-proof for gaming, but the GPU would need to be upgraded to move the combo significantly up the rankings. The current setup is only suitable for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, and it ranks accordingly among the broader field of tested hardware combinations.