Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 18 | 23 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 26 | 33 | 41 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 39 | 50 | 63 | 80 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for this AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Intel Arc B370 combination in Fivem shows a clear performance ceiling that scales predictably with resolution and preset level. At 3840x2160, the system delivers an average of 18 FPS on High settings, 29 FPS on Low, 23 FPS on Medium, and 14 FPS on Ultra. The only resolution with min and max values recorded is 3840x2160 at Medium, where the frame rate fluctuates between 20 FPS minimum and 26 FPS maximum, indicating a narrow operating window that stays well below playable thresholds.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages improve substantially: High settings produce 33 FPS, Low settings reach 53 FPS, Medium settings hit 41 FPS, and Ultra drops to 26 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution shows a min of 35 FPS and a max of 48 FPS, suggesting that even the most stable setting tier cannot hold a consistent 60 FPS. The jump from 3840x2160 to 2560x1440 yields roughly a 50% increase in average frame rate across most presets, though the absolute numbers remain insufficient for smooth gameplay.
At 1920x1080, the picture becomes more viable. Low settings average 80 FPS, Medium settings average 63 FPS, High settings average 50 FPS, and Ultra settings average 39 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution has a recorded range of 54 to 72 FPS, which means the average sits at 63 FPS but dips below 60 during demanding scenes. Low settings at 1080p are the only preset across all resolutions that maintains a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium is borderline. High and Ultra at 1080p fall short of playable performance, mirroring the pattern seen at higher resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU benchmarks place the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X in a specific performance neighborhood according to the database. Its average benchmark score of 35,909 is nearly identical to several nearby processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35,802, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Core 7 250H achieves 35,728, a 0.5% deficit. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 also hits 35,719, again 0.5% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H records 35,670, a 0.7% gap. These deltas are all within one percentage point, meaning any of these CPUs would produce virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.
The GPU side tells a different story. The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1,184, which places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all older or lower-tier parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1,186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1,190 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1,192 (0.7% higher), and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1,168 (1.4% lower). This clustering around the 1,184 to 1,192 range indicates that the Arc B370 offers performance comparable to a decade-old discrete GPU, which explains why Fivem frame rates are so low at higher resolutions. Any of these GPUs would produce similar results in this game, and the CPU choice would not meaningfully change the outcome.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest average is 29 FPS on Low settings, followed by 23 FPS on Medium, 18 FPS on High, and 14 FPS on Ultra. The verdict data confirms that no playable settings exist at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the situation is identical: no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low settings average 53 FPS, Medium 41 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS, all below the playable threshold.
At 1920x1080, the database identifies two playable presets: Low and Medium. The best playable setting is Medium, which produces an average of 63 FPS. Low settings average 80 FPS, providing headroom above the threshold. High settings at 1080p average 50 FPS, and Ultra averages 39 FPS, both unplayable. The recommended configuration for this system is therefore 1080p with Medium settings, accepting that the minimum recorded frame rate of 54 FPS means occasional dips below the 60 FPS target. Users who prioritize a consistent 60 FPS should select Low settings, which never average below the threshold.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem only at 1920x1080 with specific settings. The verdict data lists Low and Medium as the only playable presets at this resolution, with Medium being the best option at an average of 63 FPS. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the playable settings list is empty, meaning no preset at either resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold. The system falls short of 60 FPS at 1440p even on Low settings, where the average is 53 FPS, and at 4K the best case is 29 FPS on Low.
For a definitive answer: yes, the system can run Fivem, but only at 1080p. Medium settings deliver an average of 63 FPS with a recorded range of 54 to 72 FPS, so players will experience occasional frame drops during intense multiplayer scenes. Low settings provide a safer margin at 80 FPS average. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and no adjustment to CPU settings can compensate for the raw performance deficit. The data indicates that this combination is suitable for 1080p gaming in Fivem but not for higher-resolution displays.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals that the GPU is the dominant constraint in this pairing. When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average frame rate at Low settings drops from 80 FPS to 53 FPS, a 34% reduction. At Medium settings, the drop is from 63 FPS to 41 FPS, a 35% reduction. Between 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, Low settings fall from 53 FPS to 29 FPS, a 45% reduction, and Medium falls from 41 FPS to 23 FPS, a 44% reduction. This consistent proportional decline with pixel count indicates that the GPU is saturated first, while the CPU has ample headroom.
The CPU's benchmark profile supports this interpretation. The Ryzen 7 7700X scores 19,088 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,987 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 35,686. These are strong results for a desktop processor, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, by contrast, sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. The imbalance is stark: the CPU is a high-end part while the GPU is an integrated-class solution with a 25 W TDP and system-shared memory.
At 1080p, the CPU still matters for maintaining frame pacing, particularly in multiplayer scenarios with many entities. The single-thread performance of 1,090 in 3DMark single-thread and 4,190 in PassMark single-thread helps sustain the 80 FPS average on Low settings. However, as resolution increases, the GPU workload grows faster than the CPU workload, and the Arc B370's limited shading units (1,280), texture units (40), and ROPs (20) become the bottleneck. The recorded data shows that CPU performance does not change between resolutions, but GPU performance degrades proportionally, confirming the GPU-centric nature of this bottleneck.
How This Combo Ranks
Among all tested combinations in the database, this pairing ranks 3,420 out of 3,707 for Fivem. That places it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested, which is consistent with the GPU's low percentile ranking. The CPU is not the issue: the Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The Intel Arc B370, however, drags the overall result down due to its integrated graphics class performance.
The rank reflects the combined system capability, not the individual components. A system with this CPU and a more capable GPU would rank significantly higher, while a system with this GPU and a weaker CPU would likely rank similarly. The 3,420th position out of 3,707 indicates that most other hardware combinations tested in Fivem deliver better frame rates, primarily because they pair their CPUs with discrete GPUs that have dedicated memory and higher compute throughput. The Arc B370's system-shared memory and 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance are simply insufficient for demanding titles at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS on 1920x1080?
A: Yes, but only on Low and Medium settings. Low averages 80 FPS, and Medium averages 63 FPS. High and Ultra at 1080p fall below 60 FPS, averaging 50 FPS and 39 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the best preset for this system at 2560x1440?
A: No preset at 2560x1440 is playable. The highest average is 53 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 41 FPS, 33 FPS, and 26 FPS respectively.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the performance in Fivem?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 5th percentile. Frame rates drop proportionally as resolution increases, indicating GPU saturation.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B370 scores 1,184 in the database's GPU benchmark. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1,186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1,190 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1,192 (0.7% higher). All are within 1% performance.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 3840x2160 on Low settings?
A: The average is 29 FPS. Medium settings average 23 FPS with a range of 20 to 26 FPS. High averages 18 FPS and Ultra averages 14 FPS. No 4K preset approaches the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does this system rank among all tested combinations for Fivem?
A: It ranks 3,420 out of 3,707 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of systems in the database. The CPU's high performance does not compensate for the GPU's low benchmark score.