Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 77 | 96 | 122 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 138 | 173 | 219 |
| 1080p Full HD | 163 | 210 | 263 | 333 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a decisive performance tier for Fivem, with benchmark data showing playable frame rates at every tested resolution and preset. Across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold even at Ultra settings, making it a high-end pairing for this multiplayer title. The measured results place this combo at rank 220 out of 3707 tested configurations, indicating strong overall standing. The data below breaks down the specifics of how this hardware behaves, where the CPU and GPU each contribute, and what settings yield the best experience.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold. The data confirms that all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: The gap is substantial. At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 219 FPS, while Ultra drops to 107 FPS. That is a reduction of over half the frame rate, but the Ultra result still remains far above the 60 FPS playability line.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, which is nearly identical to the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209, a delta of only 0.1%. The next closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, scores 54828, putting the RTX 4080 1.1% behind that card.
Q: Which resolution shows the biggest FPS jump when lowering from Ultra to Medium?
A: At 1920x1080, the jump is 100 FPS, going from 163 FPS at Ultra to 263 FPS at Medium. At 2560x1440, the same settings change yields a 66 FPS increase (107 to 173), and at 3840x2160, it yields a 36 FPS increase (60 to 96).
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700 a top-tier CPU based on its percentile ranking?
A: The CPU sits in the 87th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40081. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, scores 40048, a difference of just 0.1%, meaning the 7700 is effectively at parity with that chip.
Q: What are the minimum FPS figures recorded for Medium settings?
A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS values are 82 at 3840x2160, 147 at 2560x1440, and 223 at 1920x1080. All of these minimums stay well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on aggregate benchmark scores, the Ryzen 7 7700 behaves almost identically to several other processors. Its average score of 40081 places it within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048, +0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 221E (40144, -0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246, -0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i9-13905H (40313, -0.6% delta). In practical terms, swapping the 7700 for any of these chips would produce no meaningful change in Fivem performance, as the CPU headroom at the tested resolutions is substantial.
On the graphics side, the RTX 4080’s average score of 54247 is matched within 0.1% by the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828) sits 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698) and AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) are 2.6% and 2.7% higher respectively, despite being from different product tiers. For a builder considering alternatives, the RTX 4080 SUPER would be a direct equivalent, while the Radeon options would offer slightly different performance characteristics in other workloads, though in Fivem the measured frame rates would likely be close.
The data shows that the CPU and GPU both occupy high percentile positions—87th for the processor and 86th for the graphics card. This means either component could be paired with a slightly weaker counterpart without bottlenecking the game. For instance, a Ryzen 7 7700 paired with a GPU a few percent slower would still likely maintain the playable frame rates seen here, given the large margins above 60 FPS at most settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
In Fivem, the performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the system produces 333 FPS at Low settings, which drops to 163 FPS at Ultra. This 170 FPS swing is driven primarily by GPU load, as lower resolutions put less strain on the graphics card while the CPU handles the game’s multiplayer logic and entity streaming.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset yields 219 FPS and Ultra yields 107 FPS. The reduction from 1080p is noticeable—114 FPS lower at Low and 56 FPS lower at Ultra—indicating that the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor as pixel count rises. The CPU’s role diminishes relatively, though the Ryzen 7 7700’s 16 threads and 32 MB of shared L3 cache provide enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck.
At 3840x2160, the gap narrows further: Low produces 122 FPS and Ultra produces 60 FPS. The Ultra result is exactly at the playable threshold, showing that the RTX 4080 is the primary constraint at 4K. The CPU’s single-thread performance, measured at 1049 in 3DMark single-thread and 1930 in Cinebench R23 single-core, is sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, but the graphics card’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are what determine the final frame rates.
Preset scaling confirms this split. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Medium is 70 FPS (333 to 263), while at 4K it is 26 FPS (122 to 96). The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 51% at 1080p (333 to 163), 51% at 1440p (219 to 107), and 51% at 4K (122 to 60). This consistent relative scaling suggests that neither component completely dominates; instead, the GPU’s rasterization and shading units—9728 shading units and 112 ROPs—scale predictably with resolution, while the CPU maintains a stable baseline.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem at all tested resolutions and presets, with every configuration meeting or exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra with an average of 60 FPS, which lands exactly on the line—playable but with no headroom for dips. High settings at 4K offer a safer margin at 77 FPS, while Low and Medium reach 122 and 96 FPS respectively.
At 2560x1440, the system is comfortably ahead of the threshold. Ultra averages 107 FPS, High averages 138 FPS, Medium averages 173 FPS, and Low averages 219 FPS. The minimum recorded FPS at Medium is 147, which is still more than double the 60 FPS requirement, so even worst-case scenarios remain smooth.
At 1920x1080, performance is exceptional. Ultra delivers 163 FPS, High delivers 210 FPS, Medium delivers 263 FPS, and Low delivers 333 FPS. The minimum at Medium is 223 FPS, ensuring no stutter or frame pacing issues on high-refresh displays. The verdict is clear: this hardware combination is overqualified for 1080p, strong at 1440p, and just sufficient for 4K Ultra, making it a versatile choice for Fivem players who prioritize high refresh rates or maximum visual fidelity.
How This Combo Ranks
The Ryzen 7 7700 and RTX 4080 combination ranks 220th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 6% of all configurations in the database. This rank reflects the balance between the two components: the CPU’s 87th percentile standing and the GPU’s 86th percentile standing combine to produce a system that handles the game’s mixed CPU/GPU load effectively.
The rank is particularly notable because Fivem is a multiplayer modification that can be sensitive to CPU performance due to server-side scripting and entity management. The Ryzen 7 7700’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, provide the single-thread speed needed for such tasks, while the RTX 4080’s raw throughput handles the visual load. Compared to the 3707 total combos, being 220th means there are 3487 configurations that perform worse, but also 219 that perform better—likely featuring newer or higher-end parts like the RTX 4090 or Ryzen 9 series.
For context, the CPU’s nearest rivals—the Ryzen AI 9 365, Core 5 221E, Ryzen 9 270, and Core i9-13905H—all fall within 0.6% of its benchmark score, so any of these in a similar GPU pairing would yield nearly identical ranks. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, would likely push the combo slightly higher in the ranking, but the delta is small enough that the 4080’s performance is effectively indistinguishable for this game.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 60 FPS. This is a marginal result—any frame rate variance could dip below the threshold—so players who prefer a buffer should consider High at 77 FPS. Medium offers 96 FPS and Low offers 122 FPS, both well above the line.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is the clear choice, averaging 107 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin over 60 FPS while delivering maximum visual quality. High settings at 138 FPS and Medium at 173 FPS are available for those who want higher refresh rates, but they are not necessary to meet the playability criterion.
At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 163 FPS, making it the best option without any compromise. Even the minimum FPS at Medium (223) exceeds what most monitors can display, so there is no reason to lower settings for performance reasons. The data shows that this combination is so powerful at 1080p that the only limiting factor is the display’s refresh rate, not the hardware.