Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 68 | 84 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 96 | 119 | 149 | 189 |
| 1080p Full HD | 140 | 183 | 229 | 291 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers strong frame rates for Fivem, with the data showing that the system can comfortably exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p across all tested presets, while 4K requires a careful selection of settings. The CPU, an 8-core Zen 4 part with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, ranks in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Together, they form a balanced pairing where the measured results indicate a system capable of high-refresh-rate multiplayer gaming, though the 4K Ultra preset dips below the 60 FPS target.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Examining the nearestRivals data for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, which places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (avgScore 40048, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Core 5 221E (avgScore 40144, deltaPct -0.2), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (avgScore 40246, deltaPct -0.4), and the Intel Core i9-13905H (avgScore 40313, deltaPct -0.6). These deltas are all within one percent, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem. The Ryzen AI 9 365 is effectively a statistical tie, while the Core i9-13905H is only 0.6% faster on average, a margin that would translate to a negligible difference in frame pacing or average FPS. For a multiplayer game like Fivem, where server-side logic and many player entities can create variable CPU loads, this level of parity suggests that swapping in any of these rivals would not alter the gaming experience in a measurable way.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (avgScore 43262, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (avgScore 43268, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (avgScore 43301, deltaPct -0.2), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (avgScore 43667, deltaPct -1). The RTX 4070 SUPER is essentially tied with the Quadro M6000 24 GB and RTX 5050 Mobile, with the RTX 4090 Mobile being just 1% faster. This is notable because the RTX 4090 Mobile is a top-tier laptop GPU, yet the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER matches it so closely in synthetic benchmarks. In Fivem, this means the GPU's rasterization performance is consistent with these alternatives; a system with a Quadro M6000 24 GB would likely produce the same 67.6 FPS at 4K High, as the benchmark data shows no meaningful gap between them.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern about which component matters more for Fivem at different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is substantial: the Low preset achieves 291.2 FPS, while Ultra drops to 140 FPS. This 151.2 FPS difference is driven largely by GPU load, as the CPU at 1080p has enough headroom to feed the GPU even at the highest settings. The RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle the texture and geometry demands at this resolution, and the benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor when pushing from Low to Ultra. The CPU's role at 1080p is to sustain high frame rates; with a single-thread score of 4063 in Passmark, it provides enough per-core performance to avoid bottlenecking, allowing the GPU to reach those 291.2 FPS lows.
Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling shows a more balanced relationship. The Ultra preset delivers 95.6 FPS, while Low hits 189 FPS, a difference of 93.4 FPS. This narrower gap compared to 1080p (151.2 FPS) suggests that the CPU is starting to matter more as the resolution increases, but the GPU still dominates the performance delta. At 3840x2160, the picture shifts further. The Ultra preset falls to 49.6 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold, while High manages 67.6 FPS and Low reaches 106.6 FPS. The 57 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 4K indicates that the GPU is heavily stressed, and the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to keep up with the rendering pipeline. The data implies that for this game, the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates at 4K, whereas at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1930 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it is not a bottleneck, making the GPU the clear scaling factor.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 630 out of 3707 combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 17% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing for a mid-range to high-end desktop configuration. The percentileVsAllCpus of 87 and percentileVsAllGpus of 83 reinforce this position, indicating that both components are above average relative to their respective categories. What this ranking suggests is that while there are faster systems, the majority of tested combos (3077 of them) produce lower performance in Fivem. The rank also implies that the system is well-balanced; a significantly weaker CPU or GPU would likely push the combo rank lower, but the data shows this pairing avoids major bottlenecks at most settings. For context, the CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 7700, so swapping in an Intel Core i9-13905H would likely keep the combo rank in the same ballpark, as the GPU remains the dominant factor in Fivem's performance.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K Ultra settings?
A: No, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 49.6, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows that High settings at 4K reach 67.6 FPS, making High the most demanding playable preset at that resolution.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: According to the verdictByResolution data, the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 95.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best settings choice for 1440p, as it delivers both high visual quality and smooth frame rates.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048) and 0.6% lower than the Intel Core i9-13905H (40313). These differences are minimal and would not lead to perceptible differences in Fivem performance.
Q: Is the GPU performance closer to a desktop or mobile card?
A: The RTX 4070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 43223 is 1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (43667), but it is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262). This indicates that the desktop card performs nearly identically to a high-end mobile GPU in synthetic tests.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 183.2 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suggests the system is capable of high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with any preset?
A: Yes, the data lists three playable settings at 3840x2160: High (67.6 FPS), Low (106.6 FPS), and Medium (84.4 FPS). Only the Ultra preset (49.6 FPS) fails to reach the 60 FPS target.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this system show a consistent scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces 291.2 FPS average, Medium achieves 229.2 FPS, High reaches 183.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 140 FPS. These numbers indicate that even the most demanding 1080p settings leave significant headroom for competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 151.2 FPS, which is the largest absolute gap across all resolutions, highlighting the GPU's workload scaling with visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a tighter range. Low settings deliver 189 FPS, Medium hits 149.1 FPS, High manages 119.2 FPS, and Ultra stays above the threshold at 95.6 FPS. The spacing between presets is roughly 30-40 FPS, reflecting a more balanced load between the CPU and GPU. The 1440p Ultra result is particularly notable because it maintains over 90 FPS, which is excellent for a multiplayer game that can suffer from frame drops in crowded areas.
The 3840x2160 results reveal the system's limits. Low settings achieve 106.6 FPS, which is still very playable, while Medium drops to 84.4 FPS and High reaches 67.6 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 49.6 FPS, marking the only instance where the system fails to clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. The progression from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a 57 FPS decrease, and the data suggests that the GPU's 12 GB memory and 192-bit bus are sufficient for High settings but not for the full Ultra experience at 4K.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the best settings preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 140 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and the data shows it clears the threshold by a wide margin, making it the recommended choice for 1080p displays. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also qualifies, delivering 95.6 FPS average, which provides a smooth experience without needing to compromise on visual quality. For 3840x2160, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 67.6 FPS. While this is above the 60 FPS threshold, it is worth remembering the margin is thinner than at lower resolutions, and the Ultra preset at 4K falls short at 49.6 FPS. The data indicates that High is the optimal balance for 4K, as it maintains playability while offering better visual fidelity than Medium (84.4 FPS) or Low (106.6 FPS), which are also playable but less visually demanding.
The Verdict
The verdictByResolution data makes it clear that this PC can run Fivem effectively at most settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low (291.2 FPS), Medium (229.2 FPS), High (183.2 FPS), and Ultra (140 FPS)—exceed the 60 FPS threshold, so the system is fully capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra at 95.6 FPS being the lowest result but still well above the playable threshold. The 3840x2160 resolution presents the only caveat: High, Medium, and Low all clear 60 FPS (67.6, 84.4, and 106.6 FPS respectively), but Ultra fails at 49.6 FPS. For a multiplayer game like Fivem, where smoothness and responsiveness are critical, the data supports running at 1440p Ultra for the best combination of visual quality and performance, or 4K High if resolution is the priority. The system's rank of 630 out of 3707 combos further confirms that this is a well-above-average configuration for Fivem, with the GPU being the primary factor at higher resolutions and the CPU providing ample headroom for the game's multi-threaded server logic.