Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers a playable Fivem experience at 1080p and 1440p, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested settings. Benchmark results show the combination is strongest at 1920x1080, where every preset clears 60 FPS, while 2560x1440 offers three playable settings, and 3840x2160 remains below the playable mark in all cases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded data shows consistently high frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 161.1, which is the highest value measured for this combo at any resolution. Medium settings produce an average of 126.8 FPS, High settings yield 98.9 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain an average of 80.1 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 81 FPS, indicating that the GPU has substantial headroom even at the most demanding preset. Every setting at this resolution exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin, with Ultra delivering 33.5% more than the threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop noticeably but remain playable for most presets. Low settings record an average of 104 FPS, Medium settings average 81.1 FPS, and High settings average 64.6 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 52 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 35-40% of the frame rate at each corresponding setting. For example, High settings drop from 98.9 FPS at 1080p to 64.6 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 34.7%. Low settings drop from 161.1 FPS to 104 FPS, a reduction of 35.4%. The gap between Low and Ultra widens at 1440p, from 81 FPS at 1080p to 52 FPS at 1440p, showing that the higher resolution amplifies the performance difference between presets.

At 3840x2160, none of the tested settings reach 60 FPS. Low settings produce the best average at 55.8 FPS, followed by Medium at 48.8 FPS, High at 35.2 FPS, and Ultra at 30.9 FPS. The 4K results show a severe drop from 1440p. High settings fall from 64.6 FPS at 1440p to 35.2 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 45.5%. Low settings fall from 104 FPS to 55.8 FPS, a reduction of 46.3%. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 24.9 FPS, which is smaller in absolute terms than at lower resolutions, but the percentage difference is similar. The data indicates that 4K requires either a more powerful GPU or significant setting compromises, and even then, the best case scenario of 55.8 FPS at Low settings remains below the playable threshold.

The min and max FPS values are not recorded in the database for any resolution or setting, so the analysis relies on average FPS only. The averages show a clear pattern: performance scales inversely with resolution and directly with preset aggressiveness. At 1080p, the combo has enough headroom that even Ultra settings deliver 80.1 FPS. At 1440p, the combo is playable up to High settings, but Ultra falls short. At 4K, the combo cannot reach the playable threshold with any preset.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data reveals how the balance between the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s performance is the more limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 7700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and its benchmarks show strong single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. However, at 1080p, the GPU is not fully saturated, and the frame rates are likely constrained by the CPU’s ability to feed the render pipeline. Evidence for this comes from the scaling between settings: Low to Ultra at 1080p changes the average from 161.1 FPS to 80.1 FPS, a reduction of 50.3%. If the GPU were the sole bottleneck, the drop would be larger because the GPU’s workload increases substantially with preset quality. The moderate drop suggests the CPU is keeping up well, but the frame rate ceiling at Low settings (161.1 FPS) reflects a CPU-side limit rather than a GPU limit.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more prominent role. The resolution increase raises the pixel count by 78% compared to 1080p, which directly increases the GPU’s shading and memory bandwidth demands. The RTX 2060 SUPER has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its 2176 shading units provide moderate throughput. The measured FPS at 1440p shows a larger percentage drop from 1080p than the resolution increase alone would predict: High settings drop 34.7%, which is less than the 78% pixel increase, indicating that the CPU is still contributing. However, the gap between Low (104 FPS) and Ultra (52 FPS) at 1440p is exactly 50%, matching the percentage gap at 1080p. This consistency suggests that the relative load between CPU and GPU remains similar, but the absolute frame rates are lower because both components are working closer to their limits.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck. The pixel count quadruples compared to 1080p, and the RTX 2060 SUPER’s memory bandwidth and shading rate cannot keep up. The measured averages at 4K are uniformly low: 55.8 FPS at Low, 48.8 FPS at Medium, 35.2 FPS at High, and 30.9 FPS at Ultra. The drop from 1440p to 4K for High settings is 45.5%, which is close to the 78% pixel increase when accounting for the fact that the GPU is already near its limit at 1440p. The CPU’s role at 4K is minimal because the GPU is saturated; even at Low settings, the GPU cannot exceed 55.8 FPS, which is well below the CPU’s capability. The Ryzen 7 7700’s multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 34470, is more than sufficient for Fivem’s gameplay logic at any resolution, but the GPU’s rasterization limits cap the frame rate at 4K.

The settings scaling also clarifies the component roles. At every resolution, the difference between Low and Ultra is roughly 50% of the Low value. At 1080p, Low is 161.1 FPS and Ultra is 80.1 FPS, a 50.3% reduction. At 1440p, Low is 104 FPS and Ultra is 52 FPS, a 50% reduction. At 4K, Low is 55.8 FPS and Ultra is 30.9 FPS, a 44.6% reduction. The slightly smaller reduction at 4K indicates that the GPU is so constrained that additional settings changes have diminishing returns. The data suggests that for this game, the CPU is sufficient at all resolutions, while the GPU determines whether the 60 FPS threshold is met.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The recorded average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 80.1, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by 33.5%. The verdict for 1080p lists all four tested settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) as playable, with Ultra being the best setting and delivering 80.1 FPS.

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: High settings are the highest playable preset at 1440p, with an average FPS of 64.6. Medium settings average 81.1 FPS and Low settings average 104 FPS. Ultra settings fall below the threshold at 52 FPS, so they are not listed as playable.

Q: Is 4K playable with this combo?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the tested settings reach 60 FPS. The best average is 55.8 FPS at Low settings, followed by 48.8 FPS at Medium, 35.2 FPS at High, and 30.9 FPS at Ultra. The verdict for 4K lists no playable settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: The reduction is consistent across presets. High settings drop from 98.9 FPS at 1080p to 64.6 FPS at 1440p, a 34.7% decrease. Low settings drop from 161.1 FPS to 104 FPS, a 35.4% decrease. Ultra settings drop from 80.1 FPS to 52 FPS, a 35.1% decrease.

Q: Which component limits performance at 4K?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at 3840x2160. The RTX 2060 SUPER’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the pixel workload, as evidenced by the low averages across all settings. The CPU’s performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760, is not the constraint at this resolution.

Q: Does the combo rank highly among other tested configurations for Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2571 out of 3707 tested combinations in the database. This places it in the lower third of tested configurations, consistent with the GPU being an older model with a 62nd percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem, but the playable experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable performance at every preset. The verdict lists Low, Medium, High, and Ultra as playable, with Ultra being the best setting and an average FPS of 80.1. This means users can run the game at maximum visual quality with comfortable headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings offer 161.1 FPS for those prioritizing high refresh rates, while Medium and High provide 126.8 and 98.9 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, the combo remains playable but with restrictions. The verdict lists High, Low, and Medium as playable settings. High settings deliver 64.6 FPS, which is just above the threshold, while Medium and Low offer 81.1 and 104 FPS respectively. Ultra settings at 1440p average 52 FPS, so they are not playable. Users at this resolution should select High or lower to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the combo cannot run the game at playable frame rates. The verdict lists no playable settings. The best case scenario, Low settings, averages 55.8 FPS, which is 4.2 FPS below the threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra are progressively worse at 48.8, 35.2, and 30.9 FPS. For 4K, a more powerful GPU would be required.

The overall assessment is that the combo is a solid 1080p performer, a capable 1440p performer with setting limitations, and unsuitable for 4K. The playable threshold of 60 FPS is cleared by at least 20 FPS at 1080p across all presets, and by at least 4.6 FPS at 1440p for the three playable settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 with an average score of 40048 and a delta of 0.1% relative to the 7700’s 40081. The Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246, 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313, 0.6% higher. These CPUs are all within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 7700’s average benchmark score, meaning that in practice, swapping to any of these would yield nearly identical CPU performance in Fivem. The Ryzen 7 7700 sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, and these rivals occupy a similar performance band.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with an average score of 18159 and a delta of -0.4% relative to the 2060 SUPER’s 18093. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, -0.5% relative. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, -1.5% relative, and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, -1.6% relative. The RTX 2060 SUPER sits at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs. The close scores mean that a system with any of these GPUs paired with a similar CPU would produce frame rates very close to the measured values. For example, the RTX 3060 Mobile is only 0.4% faster in average benchmark score, so the FPS differences in Fivem would be within a few frames. The Radeon RX 460 and Arc A770M are slightly faster in synthetic benchmarks, but their real-world gaming performance could differ due to driver and architecture differences; however, the database scores suggest they are in the same performance tier.

When considering alternative combos, a user swapping the CPU to an AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 or an Intel Core 5 221E while keeping the RTX 2060 SUPER would see negligible FPS changes, because the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at most resolutions. Conversely, swapping the GPU to an RTX 3060 Mobile or Radeon Pro 5700 while keeping the Ryzen 7 7700 would also produce similar results, with the GPU-bound scenarios at 4K potentially improving by less than 1% based on the score differences.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2571 out of 3707 total combos. This places it in the 69.4th percentile of tested configurations, meaning roughly 30% of tested combos are slower, while 70% are faster. The rank is influenced primarily by the GPU, which has a lower percentile ranking (62nd) compared to the CPU (87th). The CPU’s high performance does not compensate for the GPU’s mid-range position in this game, because Fivem’s frame rates at higher resolutions are GPU-limited.

The rank indicates that this combo is below average among all tested systems. However, the absolute performance is still sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as detailed in the verdict. The rank is more reflective of the GPU’s age and position in the market rather than a fundamental inability to run the game. The RTX 2060 SUPER was released in 2019 and is now end-of-life, while the Ryzen 7 7700 is a 2023 release with active production status. This generational gap means the GPU is the weak link in the pairing.

For context, the combo’s measured FPS at 1080p Ultra (80.1) and 1440p High (64.6) are both above the playable threshold, so despite the low rank, the experience is functional. The rank would likely improve with a newer GPU, but the data shows that the current combination meets the needs of most users at standard resolutions.