Fivem

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC in Fivem?

A: According to the recorded data, the only configuration that clears the 60 FPS playable threshold is 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which delivers an average of 63 FPS. Low settings at 1920x1080 also clears it with 80 FPS average, but Medium is the highest preset that remains at or above 60 FPS.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its closest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, which puts it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048), 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 221E (40144), 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246), and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13905H (40313). The CPU sits in the 87th percentile among all tested CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and what does that imply?

A: The Intel Arc B370 ranks in the 5th percentile among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184. This places it at the very low end of the performance spectrum, which is consistent with the measured frame rates in Fivem.

Q: Are there any settings at 2560x1440 that achieve 60 FPS?

A: No. At 2560x1440, the highest average frame rate recorded is 53 FPS on Low settings. Medium delivers 41 FPS, High delivers 33 FPS, and Ultra drops to 26 FPS. None of these reach the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What are the closest GPU alternatives in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370; the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher); the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher); and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 (1.4% lower). All of these are within 1.4% of the Arc B370's score.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded and single-threaded profile in synthetic tests?

A: The Ryzen 3DMark results show 8484 for 16 threads, 2043 for 2 threads, 3931 for 4 threads, 6933 for 8 threads, and 8479 for max threads, and 1049 for single thread. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 18760 and singlecore 1930, while Geekbench multicore scores 15371 and singlecore 2525.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The best recorded average is 29 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and maximum of 26, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. The verdict data confirms no playable settings exist at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves but still falls short. Low settings produce an average of 53 FPS, which is the highest recorded value at this resolution. Medium averages 41 FPS with a range of 35 to 48 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 2560x1440.

At 1920x1440, the data shows 1920x1440 is the only resolution where the 60 FPS threshold is met. Low settings deliver 80 FPS average, and Medium delivers 63 FPS average with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 72. High settings drop to 50 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS average. The best playable settings at this resolution, and indeed across all resolutions, is Medium at 1920x1080 with 63 FPS average.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data across resolutions and presets reveals a system that is heavily constrained by the GPU. The Intel Arc B370, with a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs, is clearly the limiting factor. The CPU, by contrast, is a high-end part sitting in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores across 3DMark, Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

The scaling pattern makes this imbalance evident. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 80 to 53 FPS, a reduction of 27 FPS. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at Low settings, it drops from 53 to 29 FPS, another 24 FPS reduction. This steep decline with increasing resolution is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering workload outpaces the GPU's capability.

The preset scaling further confirms this interpretation. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Medium is a 17 FPS drop from 80 to 60 FPS, while the difference between Medium and High is 13 FPS from 63 to 50 FPS. At 2560x1440, the step from Low to Medium costs 12 FPS from 53 to 41 FPS, and from Medium to High costs 8 FPS from 41 to 33 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Low to Medium step costs 6 FPS from 29 to 23 FPS, and the Medium to High step costs 5 FPS from 23 to 18 FPS. As resolution increases, the absolute FPS cost of higher presets shrinks, but this is because the GPU is already saturated at lower settings; there is simply less headroom to give up.

The CPU's role is less visible in the frame rates because it is not the bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 7700's 16 threads, 8 cores, and high benchmark scores, including a Passmark multithread score of 34470 and a single-thread score of 4063, provide ample processing capability. The recorded data does not show CPU utilization, but the pattern of FPS declining sharply with resolution and preset is consistent with the GPU being the dominant constraint at all three resolutions.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The answer depends on the resolution and settings. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS; the best recorded average is 29 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, no preset achieves 60 FPS either; the best recorded average is 53 FPS on Low. At 1920x1080, the system clears the threshold: Low averages 80 FPS and Medium averages 63 FPS. High averages 50 FPS and Ultra averages 39 FPS.

The verdict data explicitly lists 1920x1080 with Low and Medium as playable settings, with the best settings being Medium at 63 FPS average FPS. The 60 FPS playable threshold is met at 1920x1080 only, and the highest playable settings across all resolutions is Medium at 1920x1080 with 63 FPS average.

Users who want a smooth experience should run Fivem at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, accepting the 63 FPS average with a minimum of 54 FPS. Users who prioritize higher frame rates can use Low at 1920x1080 for 80 FPS average. At higher resolutions, the system is not playable at any preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded measurements are as follows. High settings average 18 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Low settings average 29 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Medium settings average 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 FPS and maximum of 26 FPS. Ultra settings average 14 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded.

At 2560x1440, High settings average 33 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Low settings average 53 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Medium settings average 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and maximum of 48 FPS. Ultra settings average 26 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded.

At 1920x1080, High settings average 50 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Low settings average 80 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Medium settings average 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and maximum of 72 FPS. Ultra settings average 39 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded.

The only settings with min and max values recorded are Medium at each resolution. For 3840x2160, the frame rate range is 20 to 26 FPS around the 23 FPS average. For 2560x1440, the range is 35 to 48 FPS around the 41 FPS average. For 1920x1080, the range is 54 to 72 FPS around the 63 FPS average. These ranges indicate that the game at Medium settings is reasonably consistent, with the 1920x1080 configuration showing a spread of 18 FPS between the minimum and maximum.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 combined with the Intel Arc B370 ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the system in the bottom portion of the overall distribution, at roughly the 92nd percentile from the bottom, meaning only about 287 combos rank lower. The ranking reflects the GPU's severe constraint: the Arc B370's 5th percentile standing among GPUs drags down a combo that otherwise features a CPU in the 87th percentile.

The rank is consistent with the measured frame rates. At 3840x2160, the system averages between 14 and 29 FPS depending on settings. At 2560x1440, it averages between 26 and 53 FPS. At 1920x1080, it averages between 39 and 80 FPS. These are not competitive numbers for a modern gaming system, and the rank of 3420 out of 3707 accurately captures that reality.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, are all within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 7700's 40081 average. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313 (0.6% higher). A system with any of these CPUs paired with the same GPU would produce nearly identical FPS in Fivem, since the GPU is the bottleneck.

The GPU's nearest rivals, based on the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, are all within 1.4% of the Arc B370. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher), and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 (1.4% lower). Any of these GPUs paired with the Ryzen 7 7700 would behave similarly in Fivem, with frame rates within a few FPS of the measured values. In practice, the observed performance is dominated by the GPU's low computational throughput, so alternatives within this narrow band would not meaningfully change the playability picture: 1920x1080 Medium at 63 FPS remains the ceiling, and higher resolutions remain unplayable.