Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 31 | 39 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 56 | 71 | 89 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 86 | 107 | 136 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a decidedly mixed experience in Fivem, heavily dependent on the resolution and graphics preset selected. At 1080p, the pairing proves to be a highly capable performer, clearing the 60 FPS threshold even at the most demanding settings. However, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K, where no tested preset achieves the 60 FPS target. The sweet spot for this configuration is 1440p, where it balances visual fidelity with smooth performance on Medium settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strongest showing. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 136 FPS, providing a highly responsive experience for competitive play. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 107 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS, indicating consistent performance without significant dips. High settings still deliver a robust 86 FPS average. Even at the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration tested, the average frame rate remains a solid 67 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance impact is noticeable but the system remains viable. Low settings produce an average of 89 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 1080p result but still very smooth. Medium settings yield an average of 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS. This places the system right at the edge of the playable threshold, with the minimum frame rate exactly meeting the 60 FPS target. High settings see a further decline to 56 FPS average, which falls short of the playable mark. The Ultra preset at this resolution is not viable, averaging only 44 FPS.
The 3840x2160 results show the hardware hitting its limits. At Low settings, the average FPS is 50, which is below the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 39 FPS, with minimum and maximum values of 33 and 45 FPS respectively. High settings drop to a 31 FPS average, and Ultra is the worst performer at 24 FPS. None of these configurations provide a smooth gameplay experience, making 4K unsuitable for this title with this hardware combination.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The data from the nearest rivals provides context for how this specific CPU and GPU pairing compares to other components. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT's average benchmark score of 29879 places it in close proximity to several other processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H sits nearly identical with an average score of 29868, showing a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both achieve an average score of 29955, which is 0.3% higher than the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X trails slightly with a score of 29713, representing a 0.6% performance deficit. This indicates that the 5800XT's processing power is in line with these modern laptop and desktop chips, meaning systems built with those CPUs would likely produce similar frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.
On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 aligns it with several other GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile achieves a score of 20534, just 0.1% lower than the B570. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X are also nearby, with scores of 20480 and 20662 respectively, representing deltas of 0.4% and -0.5%. This suggests that a system with an RTX 3070 Mobile or an Arc A750 would deliver very comparable FPS numbers in Fivem, as the overall graphics performance is nearly identical. Users with these alternative components can expect a similar gameplay experience at each resolution and preset combination.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate a dynamic relationship between the CPU and GPU depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is likely more CPU-bound. The high frame rates, especially at Low settings with 136 FPS, suggest that the Ryzen 7 5800XT's 8-core, 16-thread configuration is providing ample processing power to feed the graphics card. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a performance drop of roughly 51%, from 136 FPS down to 67 FPS, which indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as the graphical load increases, but the CPU is still keeping up.
As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more prominent. The frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings is substantial. For instance, at Low settings, the average FPS falls from 136 to 89, a reduction of about 35%. At Medium settings, it falls from 107 to 71, a 34% reduction. This scaling shows that the increased pixel count is placing a significantly heavier load on the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is still capable, but the GPU's rendering throughput is now the primary constraint on performance.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is definitively the bottleneck. The performance falls to an average of 50 FPS even at Low settings, which is far below the playable threshold. The scaling between 1440p and 4K at Low settings shows a further 44% drop in performance, from 89 to 50 FPS. This dramatic decline illustrates that the Arc B570, with its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus, cannot handle the sheer number of pixels at 4K resolution in this game. The CPU's performance is largely irrelevant at this point, as the GPU is overwhelmed by the rendering workload.
The Verdict
Based on the measured data, this PC can run Fivem, but its playability is strictly limited by resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—achieving average frame rates above the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset, with an average of 67 FPS, is the best choice for visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the system is playable, but only on the Low and Medium presets. The Medium preset is the optimal choice here, delivering an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS, which meets the playability threshold. High and Ultra settings at this resolution are not recommended, as they fall to 56 and 44 FPS respectively.
At 3840x2160, the system fails to provide a playable experience. None of the tested presets—Low, Medium, High, or Ultra—reach the 60 FPS target, with the best result being 50 FPS on Low settings. Users seeking to play Fivem at 4K resolution with this hardware would need to consider lower internal resolutions or other compromises, as the current configuration is not sufficient.
How This Combo Ranks
The Ryzen 7 5800XT and Arc B570 combination holds a rank of 2980 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the lower-mid range of all configurations evaluated. The rank reflects the system's inability to handle 4K resolution and its limitations at 1440p on higher presets. While it performs admirably at 1080p, the overall score is dragged down by the poor 4K results. This ranking suggests that while the combo is not at the bottom of the pile, a significant number of other hardware pairings are capable of delivering better performance, likely due to more powerful GPUs that can handle higher resolutions more effectively.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the goal is to identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice. It is the most demanding setting tested and achieves an average of 67 FPS, which is securely above the 60 FPS threshold. This allows users to experience the game with the highest visual fidelity available in the test without sacrificing smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the optimal configuration. It is the most demanding preset that still meets the playability target, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, making it the recommended setting for 1440p gaming.
At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset, as all settings fall below the 60 FPS target. The data shows no best settings for this resolution, as the hardware is not capable of delivering a smooth experience at 4K. Users are advised to lower the resolution to 1440p or below to achieve playable frame rates.