Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

40%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
88 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
43 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
58 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
29 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
32 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
16 FPS
17.9ms Frame Time
27ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 27,896
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 16 20 25 32
1440p QHD 29 37 46 58
1080p Full HD 43 56 70 88

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 56
1920x1080 Low 88
1920x1080 Medium 70
1920x1080 Ultra 43
2560x1440 High 37
2560x1440 Low 58
2560x1440 Medium 46
2560x1440 Ultra 29
3840x2160 High 20
3840x2160 Low 32
3840x2160 Medium 25
3840x2160 Ultra 16

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a highly unbalanced configuration for Fivem, with the integrated graphics component severely limiting overall performance. The database shows this is a common outcome when a high-end CPU is paired with entry-level graphics silicon. The recorded data indicates that the system only achieves playable frame rates at 1920x1080 resolution on Low and Medium presets, while failing to reach the 60 FPS threshold at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 resolution, the performance is uniformly below playable standards. The Low preset yields an average of 32 FPS, while Medium drops to 25 FPS with a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 29 FPS. High settings produce 20 FPS on average, and the Ultra preset falls to 16 FPS. These figures show that the system cannot maintain a smooth experience at any graphical level in 4K.

At 2560x1440 resolution, the results improve but remain short of the 60 FPS target. The Low preset reaches an average of 58 FPS, which is close to the threshold but just misses it. Medium settings average 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS. High reaches 37 FPS average, and the Ultra preset drops to 29 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 12 FPS at the average mark, showing that even marginal graphical increases in visual fidelity cost noticeable frame rate.

At 1920x1080 resolution, the data shows a clear step up in performance. The Low preset averages 88 FPS, and Medium averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 43 FPS average. The Medium preset is the only preset with recorded min/max values, at 59 FPS minimum and 80 FPS maximum, indicating that frame times are relatively stable at that setting. The difference between Low and Medium at 1080p is 18 FPS, while moving from Medium to High costs 14 FPS on average.

CPU and GPU Roles

The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, is a powerful 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 3 architecture with a 96 MB shared L3 cache. Its benchmark scores are strong, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14317 and a single-core score of 1452, plus a Geekbench multicore score of 11765. The processor sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The GPU, however, is an integrated graphics solution from Intel, the Arc B390, which ranks at the 9th percentile among all GPUs and has an average benchmark score of 1482.

The scaling data reveals the GPU is the decisive bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system averages 88 FPS, but at 1440p Low it drops to 58 FPS, a reduction of 30 FPS. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 32 FPS. This steep decline as resolution increases is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU could handle far more frames, but the Arc B390 cannot feed the display with enough frames at higher pixel counts.

Preset scaling reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra changes the average from 88 FPS to 43 FPS, a 45 FPS swing. At 1440p, the same preset change moves from 58 FPS to 29 FPS. The consistent halving of frame rates as settings increase points directly to the graphics unit as the limiting factor. The CPU, with its high multi-threaded throughput and large cache, is not the constraint in this pairing. The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 5800X3D has ample headroom, but the Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics cannot translate that headroom into higher frame rates.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS or more. The closest is the Low preset at 32 FPS average, which is 28 FPS short of the playable threshold. The database records no playable settings for 4K.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar. The Low preset reaches 58 FPS average, just below the 60 FPS mark. No preset is playable at this resolution. The best possible average at 1440p is 58 FPS, but it remains below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on two presets: Low and Medium. The Low preset averages 88 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS. The Medium preset is the best playable option at 1080p, as it stays at or above 60 FPS average FPS while offering improved visual quality over Low. The High preset averages 56 FPS, which is below the threshold, and Ultra averages 43 FPS.

For users targeting a playable frame rates, the 1920x1080 Medium preset is the recommended ceiling. It sustains 70 FPS average, which is 10 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, while the Low preset offers 88 FPS average for users who prioritize frame rate headroom.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are clustered very closely in average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, which is 0% different from the 5800X3D's score of 27896. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872, a delta of 0.1. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, a delta of -0.1. The Intel Core i5-12600KF scores 27799, a delta of 0.3. These four rivals all perform within a fraction of a percent of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, meaning any of them would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all older NVIDIA parts with similarly low scores. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463, a delta of 1.3% behind the Arc B390's 1482. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1460, a delta of 1.5%. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446, a delta of 2.5%. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1443, a delta of 2.7%. These deltas are small, so the Arc B390 and these GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS numbers in Fivem. A user switching from a GT 710 to the Arc B390 would see only a minor improvement, around 2.7% at best in the average benchmark score.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No. The database records no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average FPS at 4K is 32 FPS on Low settings, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1920x1080?

A: The Medium preset is the best playable setting at 1080p, with an average of 70 FPS. The Low preset averages 88 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to other GPUs in the database?

A: The Arc B390 ranks at the 9th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710, has an average score of 1443, a delta of 2.7%.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800X3D a strong CPU for gaming?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D ranks at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 27896, and its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, scores 27887, a delta of 0%.

Q: Why is Fivem performance so much lower at 1440p compared to 1080p?

A: The data shows a 30 FPS drop from 88 FPS average at 1080p Low to 58 FPS average at 1440p Low. This scaling pattern indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, as the Arc B390 cannot maintain frame rates at higher pixel counts.

Q What is the average FPS difference between 1080p Low and 1080p Ultra?

A: The difference is 45 FPS on average. Low averages 88 FPS at 1080p, while Ultra averages 43 FPS at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo ranks 3294 out of 3707 tested combos in the database. This places it in the lower portion of all tested CPU and GPU combinations in the game Fivem. The rank of 3294 with a total of 3707 means roughly 89% of tested combos perform better in this game. This low rank is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the GPU's weak performance drags down the overall potential of the powerful CPU. The CPU alone would rank much higher based on its 80th percentile standing, but the combination suffers because the Arc B390 cannot deliver adequate frame rates at most resolutions and settings.

The combination of an 80th percentile CPU and a 9th percentile GPU is reflected in the rank. The system is only capable of 60 FPS at 1080p on Low and Medium settings, which is a limited range of playable scenarios. The 4K and 1440p verdicts show no playable settings at all, and even at 1080p, High and Ultra presets fall below the 60 FPS mark.

The Verdict

The data indicates this PC can run Fivem at 1920x1080 on Low or Medium settings, with the Medium preset averaging 70 FPS and Low averaging 88 FPS. The verdict by resolution states that 1080p has playable settings of Low and Medium, with the best setting being Medium at 70 FPS average. For 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: no playable settings are recorded. The system cannot reach 60 FPS average at any preset in those resolutions.

The root cause is the Intel Arc B390 integrated GPU, which has a 9th percentile ranking and a 1482 average benchmark score. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a capable processor, but it is paired with graphics hardware that is only suitable for lighter loads or lower resolutions. Benchmark results show the GPU's nearest rivals are all older low-end NVIDIA parts, confirming its entry-level position. The system is playable at 1080p Medium, but users seeking 1440p or 4K performance would need to consider a different graphics solution entirely.