Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers measured frame rates that clear the 60 FPS playable threshold in Fivem at every tested resolution and preset. At 3840x2160 Ultra the average is exactly 60 FPS, while 2560x1440 Ultra reaches 107 FPS and 1920x1080 Ultra reaches 163 FPS. The dataset covers High, Low, Medium, and Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, with min/max values recorded for Medium presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 77 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 122 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96 | 82 | 110 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 60 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 138 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 219 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 173 | 147 | 199 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 210 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 304 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 263 | 223 | 302 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 163 | — | — |

The pattern is consistent: at every resolution, average FPS rises as settings move from Ultra to High to Medium to Low. At 4K, the progression is 60, 77, 96, and 122. At 1440p, it is 107, 138, 173, and 219. At 1080p, it is 163, 210, 263, and 304. The Medium preset is the only one with min/max data, and those ranges are tight relative to their averages: at 4K Medium, the min is 82 and max 110; at 1440p Medium, 147 to 199; at 1080p Medium, 223 to 302. This suggests frame pacing is stable enough that even the lowest recorded values remain far above the playable threshold.

Resolution scaling is also clear. At Low settings, the average drops from 304 at 1080p to 219 at 1440p to 122 at 4K. At Ultra, it drops from 163 at 1080p to 107 at 1440p to 60 at 4K. The fact that 4K Ultra lands exactly on 60 FPS means the system is capable of running the game at maximum visual quality, but with no headroom at that specific setting.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K Ultra?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 60, which meets the 60 FPS playable threshold exactly.

Q: What is the highest average FPS in the dataset?

A: 304 FPS at 1920x1080 Low.

Q: Which preset includes min/max frame rate data?

A: Only Medium presets have min/max values: at 4K, min 82 and max 110; at 1440p, min 147 and max 199; at 1080p, min 223 and max 302.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER in aggregate benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the 4080 in this dataset.

Q: Is the CPU likely to limit performance at 1080p Low?

A: The data shows 304 FPS at 1080p Low, which is very high. That suggests the GPU is not saturated at that point, but the fact pack does not include CPU utilization data, so the exact bottleneck cannot be confirmed.

Q: Are all tested settings playable at 1440p?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440, even Ultra averages 107 FPS, while High averages 138, Medium 173, and Low 219.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS scaling indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant limiting factor as resolution increases. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces the average from 304 to 219, and moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it further to 122. At Ultra, the same resolution steps produce 163, 107, and 60. This consistent decline across all presets points to a GPU workload that grows heavily with pixel count.

At 1080p, the CPU’s role is relatively more important because the GPU can render frames at very high rates. The 304 FPS average on Low shows that the CPU is capable of feeding frames quickly enough to support a high refresh rate. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which provides strong single-thread headroom for multiplayer scenarios. The 5800X also sits in the 81st percentile among all CPUs in the benchmark database, reinforcing that it is not a weak link in this pairing.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting component. The RTX 4080, with its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, is still able to hold 60 FPS at Ultra, but the fact that Low only reaches 122 FPS at 4K—compared to 304 at 1080p—shows how much the resolution increase taxes the GPU. The CPU’s 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock are more than sufficient for this game’s logic; the frame rate differences between presets are driven by GPU rendering load.

The data does not isolate CPU and GPU utilization, so a precise split is impossible. However, the shape of the results—large FPS drops from resolution scaling and smaller, but still large, drops from preset changes—strongly suggests that at 1440p and 4K, the RTX 4080 is the deciding factor. At 1080p, the CPU likely matters more because the GPU has headroom, but the overall system is well balanced.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29123, and its nearest rivals are all within a small delta. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H scores 29093, which is 0.1% lower than the 5800X. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 scores 29245, putting it 0.4% ahead. The Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, 0.5% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, 0.6% behind. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem, though the game’s frame rate at higher resolutions will be dominated by the GPU.

For the GPU, the RTX 4080 scores 54247 and sits in the 86th percentile. The closest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54209 and is 0.1% behind in this dataset. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, 1.1% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6% ahead. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.7% ahead. Because these deltas are small, a system using any of these GPUs with the same CPU would likely produce FPS values close to the measured results, assuming no other bottlenecks intervene. The RTX 4080 SUPER is the most direct equivalent, while the AMD options are slightly faster in aggregate score but still within a narrow band.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 60 FPS. Lower presets are also playable: High averages 77, Medium 96, and Low 122. Because Ultra is the highest visual preset and it clears the threshold, it is the best choice for 4K.

At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 107 FPS, so it is both the best visual preset and comfortably above 60 FPS. High averages 138, Medium 173, and Low 219, but there is no reason to drop below Ultra when the average is 107.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 163 FPS, making it the best setting. High averages 210, Medium 263, and Low 304, but Ultra still provides a high frame rate with maximum visual quality. In all three resolutions, the answer is the same: Ultra is the best preset because it is the most demanding option and still meets the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem. The verdict data lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings at every resolution. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 60 FPS exactly; at 2560x1440, Ultra averages 107; at 1920x1080, Ultra averages 163. No tested configuration falls below 60 FPS. The only setting that sits right on the line is 4K Ultra, where the average is exactly 60 FPS, so players who want a safety margin at 4K could choose High (77 FPS) or Medium (96 FPS) without sacrificing much visual quality. At 1440p and 1080p, the system has substantial headroom even on Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

In Fivem’s tested combination list, this pairing ranks 303rd out of 3,707 combinations. That places it in the upper tier of tested hardware. The CPU is in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The rank reflects the combined capability of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, and the measured FPS data confirms that this is a high-performing setup for Fivem, particularly at 1440p and 1080p where Ultra settings run well above 60 FPS.