Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a highly playable Fivem experience across most resolutions, with the data showing a clear performance ceiling at 4K Ultra settings. The pairing of a Zen 3 octa-core processor with an Ada Lovelace GPU produces strong frame rates, but the measured FPS reveals that Fivem's demands scale significantly with resolution, making 1440p the sweet spot for visual fidelity and 1080p a high-refresh-rate powerhouse.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearestRivals data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, the benchmark scores place it in close competition with several other processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H trails by a mere 0.1 percent, while the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 sits 0.4 percent ahead. The Intel Core i5-13500HX is 0.5 percent faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is 0.6 percent behind. This cluster of processors all hover around the 29,000 average benchmark score mark, indicating that users with any of these CPUs would see nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem. The Ryzen 7 5800X's 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, but the narrow deltaPct values suggest that swapping between these rivals would produce no perceptible difference in frame rates.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's nearest rivals are an eclectic mix. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 0.2 percent higher, the AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3 percent behind, and both the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 lag by 0.5 and 0.7 percent respectively. The RTX 4060's 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs shows it sits slightly above the median, but the remarkably small deltaPct values — all under one percent — mean that in pure benchmark terms, these four rivals are virtually interchangeable. In Fivem specifically, the performance differences would be negligible, though the RTX 4060's modern architecture and feature set may offer advantages beyond raw FPS that these older or integrated alternatives cannot match.

The practical implication is that users considering this combo have a wide range of comparable hardware options. The CPU rivals all deliver within a fraction of a percent of the same average score, and the GPU rivals similarly cluster tightly. This suggests that Fivem's performance is not highly sensitive to the precise model of CPU or GPU within these performance tiers, but rather to the overall class of hardware being used.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS in 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured FPS shows 68.3 average at 3840x2160 with Low settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 56.6 FPS, High to 42.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 31.2 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gameplay?

A: The data shows Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 62.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution, offering the best visual quality while maintaining smooth performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X scores a 29,123 average benchmark score, placing it 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and 0.5 percent ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500HX. It trails the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 by 0.4 percent and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT by 0.6 percent, showing all four rivals are within a single percentage point of each other.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured FPS shows an average of 89.4 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the best playable preset for this resolution. Users seeking even higher frame rates can drop to Medium for 149.5 FPS or Low for 190.2 FPS.

Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, where even High settings only reach 42.7 FPS. At 1440p and 1080p, the GPU handles Ultra settings comfortably, suggesting the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the graphics card at these lower resolutions.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1984th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the 54th percentile of all systems tested. This means roughly half of all tested combos perform better and half perform worse, reflecting the mid-range positioning of the RTX 4060 paired with a high-end CPU.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1984th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it just past the midpoint of all systems in the database. This positioning is somewhat surprising given the CPU's strong 81st percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 61st percentile standing. The rank suggests that while each component is individually competitive, the pairing does not boost to the top tier of gaming performance in Fivem.

The gap between the CPU's high percentile and the combo's mid-pack rank implies that Fivem is not heavily CPU-bound at most settings. The RTX 4060's 61st percentile GPU ranking is closer to the combo's overall position, indicating that the graphics card is the primary determinant of the system's ranking. Users with higher-performing GPUs would likely see significant improvements, while those with the same CPU but a more powerful graphics card would move substantially up the rankings.

The rank also reflects the measured FPS data across resolutions. At 4K, the combo struggles to maintain 60 FPS except at Low settings, which is consistent with a mid-pack ranking. At 1440p and 1080p, the system performs admirably, but the 4K weakness drags the overall standing down relative to combos that can handle 4K Ultra more effectively. This suggests that users prioritizing high-resolution gaming may want to consider a more powerful GPU, while those gaming at 1080p or 1440p will find this combo well-suited to their needs.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this PC can run Fivem, with playable performance available at every resolution tested. At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, achieving an average of 68.3 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 56.6, 42.7, and 31.2 respectively. This makes 4K viable only for users willing to accept significant visual compromises.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is much more favorable. All four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable, with averages of 127.1, 97.9, 80, and 62.1 FPS respectively. Ultra settings just barely clear the 60 FPS bar, making 1440p the resolution where this combo truly shines. The system can deliver high visual quality while maintaining smooth, responsive gameplay.

The 1920x1080 results are the strongest in the dataset. Every preset is comfortably playable, with Ultra averaging 89.4 FPS, High hitting 120.5 FPS, Medium reaching 149.5 FPS, and Low peaking at 190.2 FPS. This resolution offers plenty of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors or users who prefer maximum frame rates over visual fidelity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured FPS reveals a steep performance curve across settings. Low settings produce an average of 68.3 FPS, which drops to 56.6 FPS at Medium — a 17 percent reduction. High settings yield 42.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 31.2 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 54 percent decrease in frame rate, indicating that 4K is heavily GPU-bound and sensitive to graphical demands.

The 2560x1440 results show a more moderate decline. Low settings average 127.1 FPS, Medium 97.9 FPS, High 80 FPS, and Ultra 62.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 51 percent, similar to 4K, but every tier remains playable. The smallest drop occurs between High and Ultra at 18 FPS, while the largest is between Low and Medium at 29.2 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance. Low settings hit 190.2 FPS, Medium 149.5 FPS, High 120.5 FPS, and Ultra 89.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 53 percent reduction, consistent with the other resolutions. Notably, even the most demanding settings at 1080p exceed the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, making this resolution the most versatile for this combo.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Low, which achieves an average of 68.3 FPS. This is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution. Users who prioritize frame rate stability over visual quality should select Low, as the next tier up, Medium, falls to 56.6 FPS and would result in noticeable stutter during demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is the best setting, averaging 62.1 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable, offering the full visual experience while staying just above the 60 FPS threshold. The 62.1 FPS average provides a small buffer, but users sensitive to frame drops may prefer High at 80 FPS for additional headroom.

The 1920x1080 resolution allows Ultra settings at 89.4 FPS, making it the best choice for maximum quality. This average provides a substantial 29.4 FPS cushion above the playable threshold, accommodating most scene complexity without dipping below 60 FPS. Users seeking even higher refresh rates can drop to Medium for 149.5 FPS or Low for 190.2 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint, as evidenced by the steep performance drop from Low to Ultra. The RTX 4060's 8 GB of memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Low settings but become limiting as graphical demands increase. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance, shown by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 943, is not the bottleneck at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, demonstrated by its cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15476, become more relevant as the GPU has more headroom. The fact that Ultra settings still achieve 62.1 FPS suggests the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at this resolution, though the 18 FPS gap between High and Ultra indicates the GPU is still the primary limiter.

The 1920x1080 results show the CPU taking a more prominent role. The high frame rates at Low settings — 190.2 FPS — approach the limits of what the CPU can deliver in Fivem. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 7586 and passmark_multithread score of 27732 indicate strong multi-core performance, but even this CPU begins to show its limits at very high frame rates. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p demonstrates that both components contribute meaningfully, with the GPU becoming more influential as settings increase and the CPU mattering more at lower settings where frame rates are highest.