Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Arc B570 pairing delivers a mixed bag for Fivem, with clear performance limits at higher resolutions. The data shows this combo is capable of smooth play at 1080p and even 1440p with settings tuned, but fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. The benchmark results indicate a system that is strongly held back by the GPU at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,123. Its nearest rivals are exceptionally close in performance, with deltas under one percent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is the nearest match, scoring 29,093, a mere 0.1% behind. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 scores 29,245, landing 0.4% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-13500HX achieves 29,270, also 0.5% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT trails slightly at 28,940, a 0.6% deficit. For Fivem, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates, meaning the choice between them should come down to platform features rather than gaming performance.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570 reaches the 65th percentile of all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 20,556. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20,534, just 0.1% behind. The Intel Arc A750 is essentially a tie, scoring 20,582, a 0.1% advantage. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M trails by 0.4% at 20,480, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X sits 0.5% ahead at 20,662. In practice, these GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS in Fivem at the same settings, so owners of any of these cards can expect similar behavior at each resolution.

The takeaway is straightforward: this CPU and GPU pairing behaves almost identically to a cluster of alternatives. If you were considering a system with an Intel Core i5-13500HX or an Intel Arc A750, the frame rates in Fivem would be indistinguishable from what this combo delivers.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data clearly shows how the balance of work shifts between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 136 FPS on Low settings, which indicates the GPU is not yet the limiting factor. The CPU, with its strong single-thread score of 1,574.5 in Cinebench R23 and 3,445 in PassMark single-thread, has enough headroom to feed the GPU efficiently at this resolution. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 29 FPS (136 down to 107), and from Medium to High another 21 FPS (107 down to 86). The drop from High to Ultra is 19 FPS (86 down to 67). This scaling shows the GPU is increasingly stressed as settings rise, but still maintains playable performance across all presets.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck. Low settings yield 89 FPS, a 47 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium falls to 71 FPS, and High to 56 FPS. The gap between 1080p and 1440p at the same settings is substantial, confirming that resolution scaling heavily taxes the Arc B570. At 1440p Medium, the minimum FPS recorded is 60, meaning the system just barely holds the playable threshold. The CPU is less relevant here; the data shows the GPU struggling to keep up.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is completely overwhelmed. Even Low settings only produce 50 FPS, and Medium drops to 39 FPS with a minimum of 33. High falls to 31 FPS, and Ultra to 24 FPS. The CPU's performance is nearly irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to utilize the processor's capabilities. The benchmark results indicate that Fivem at 4K is entirely GPU-bound, and this particular card lacks the raw throughput to handle it.

The overall pattern is that at 1080p, the system is balanced, with the CPU capable of driving high frame rates when the GPU is not taxed. At 1440p, the GPU starts to dominate, and at 4K, it is the sole limiting factor. Users with this combo should prioritize GPU upgrades if they want to play at 4K, while the CPU is more than adequate for lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 67, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets at 1080p clear 60 FPS, including High at 86 FPS, Low at 136 FPS, and Medium at 107 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 that maintains 60 FPS?

A: Medium is the highest playable preset at 1440p, delivering an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60. Low settings achieve 89 FPS, but High drops to 56 FPS and Ultra to 44 FPS, both below the threshold.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 strong enough for 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only produce 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium yields 39 FPS, High 31 FPS, and Ultra 24 FPS. No preset at 4K reaches a playable frame rate.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X has an average benchmark score of 29,123, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H scores 29,093. The delta is 0.1%, meaning the two CPUs perform essentially identically in synthetic benchmarks. In Fivem, this difference would translate to no noticeable frame rate variance.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1440p High is 56, which is 4 FPS below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This preset is not recommended for smooth play, as the minimum frame rate is not recorded but the average indicates occasional dips below 60.

Q: Does the GPU or CPU limit performance more at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the system is relatively balanced. The CPU's strong single-thread performance allows it to push 136 FPS on Low settings, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings increase. The drop from Low to Ultra is 69 FPS (136 down to 67), showing that the Arc B570 is the primary constraint at higher presets.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear. At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves 60 FPS, making this resolution unplayable with this combo. The best case is Low at 50 FPS, which is still a 10 FPS deficit. At 2560x1440, Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium being the best option at 71 FPS. High and Ultra fall short at 56 FPS and 44 FPS, respectively. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra delivering 67 FPS and Low reaching 136 FPS. This PC can run Fivem smoothly at 1080p across the entire settings range, and at 1440p with Medium or Low settings. For 4K, the system is not viable, and users should either lower the resolution or upgrade the GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 2,980 out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem. That places it in the bottom 20% of systems tested, which reflects its inability to handle 4K and its only moderate performance at 1440p. The rank is heavily influenced by the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU itself is quite strong. In the context of all tested combinations, this pairing is a mid-to-low tier option, suitable for 1080p gaming but not for high-resolution enthusiasts. The data indicates that many other combinations deliver better 1440p and 4K performance, while this one is best suited for budget-conscious 1080p builds.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average FPS of 67. This is the highest quality setting available that maintains playable frame rates, and it offers a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, Ultra is the clear choice.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is Medium, which delivers an average FPS of 71 and a minimum of 60. This strikes a balance between visual quality and performance, as Low yields 89 FPS but with reduced graphics, while High falls below the threshold at 56 FPS. Medium is the recommended setting for 1440p.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, so there is no recommended setting. The closest is Low at 50 FPS, but this is still below the playable threshold. Users should avoid 4K with this combo unless they are willing to accept sub-60 FPS performance.