Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

71%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
151 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
73 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
98 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
49 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 24,709
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 34 43 55
1440p QHD 49 60 81 98
1080p Full HD 73 98 123 151

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 151
1920x1080 Medium 123
1920x1080 Ultra 73
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 Ultra 49
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Low 55
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a performance profile in Fivem that is heavily dependent on resolution and graphical preset. At 1920x1080, the combination provides a wide range of playable settings, while 2560x1440 remains viable at moderate presets. The data indicates that 3840x2160 is not a viable target for this pairing, as even the lowest settings fail to reach the 60 FPS threshold. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes it against other tested hardware combinations, and provides actionable guidance on settings for each resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combination in Fivem show a clear and consistent scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the lowest preset yields an average of 151.1 FPS, which drops to 122.6 FPS at Medium, 97.9 FPS at High, and 72.5 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial, representing a reduction of approximately 52% in average frame rate. Notably, even the most demanding Ultra preset at this resolution maintains an average well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scaling remains predictable but the absolute numbers compress. The Low preset averages 98 FPS, Medium achieves 80.7 FPS, and High drops to 60.3 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the playable threshold at 49 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 35% of the average frame rate at Low settings (from 151.1 to 98 FPS), which is a typical penalty for a 77% increase in pixel count. At High settings, the drop from 97.9 to 60.3 FPS represents a 38% reduction, showing that the Arc B580 is the limiting factor as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the combination struggles to maintain playable frame rates across all presets. The Low preset averages 55.1 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium drops to 42.8 FPS, High to 33.9 FPS, and Ultra to 26.9 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe: even the Low preset at 4K (55.1 FPS) is slower than the Ultra preset at 1440p (49 FPS) only by a small margin, but the 4K Low figure still misses the playable mark. The data shows that pixel count is the dominant factor here, as the GPU's raw throughput cannot compensate for the 2.25x increase in pixels from 1440p to 4K.

The min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. The absence of frame time variance data means that stuttering or hitch behavior cannot be assessed from these figures. However, the average FPS numbers alone are sufficient to determine playability against the 60 FPS threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 2841 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This percentile position is somewhat surprising given the individual component rankings: the Ryzen 7 5700X3D sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B580 ranks at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The combination underperforms relative to what those individual percentiles might suggest, likely due to the game's engine characteristics or the specific driver overhead of the Intel GPU in this multiplayer title.

The rank of 2841 out of 3707 means that roughly 77% of tested combinations deliver better performance in Fivem. This places the pairing in a territory where users should expect to make compromises at higher resolutions. The individual component scores do not translate directly into game performance; the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore of 22366 and Geekbench multicore of 11086) do not overcome the GPU's mid-range position when the resolution demands more pixel throughput.

The delta between the combo's actual ranking and what the component percentiles alone would predict suggests that Fivem is not particularly sensitive to the CPU's strengths in this configuration. The game appears to be more GPU-bound at the resolutions tested, which explains why the 4K results are uniformly poor despite the CPU's capable single-thread performance (Passmark single thread of 2970 and 3DMark single thread of 804).

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080 with all settings maxed?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 72.5 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data confirms that all four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at this resolution deliver playable frame rates.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset is the most demanding playable option at 2560x1440, averaging 60.3 FPS. The Medium preset provides more headroom at 80.7 FPS, but High is the highest preset that still clears the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 3840x2160 playable at any setting?

A: No. The lowest tested preset at 3840x2160 (Low) averages 55.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets at this resolution are significantly lower, with Ultra averaging only 26.9 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D's average benchmark score of 24709 is effectively identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D (24728, delta of -0.1%). It is also within a narrow band of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (24822, delta -0.5%) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-12450HX (24576, delta +0.5%).

Q: What GPU performance is comparable to the Arc B580?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 is nearly matched by the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, delta -0.2%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, delta +0.6%). It is slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, delta -0.7%).

Q: Why does the 4K result drop so sharply from 1440p?

A: The average frame rate at 4K Low (55.1 FPS) is 44% lower than 1440p Low (98 FPS). This steep decline is consistent with the 2.25x pixel count increase, indicating that the Arc B580's memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are insufficient for 4K in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rival data for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D delivers an average benchmark score within -0.1% of the Ryzen 7 5700X3D, making it a near-identical performer for Fivem. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is also extremely close at -0.5%, though it is a mobile processor, which may have different sustained performance characteristics. On the Intel side, the Core i5-12450HX (+0.5%) and Core i5-11600 (+0.6%) are both within a fraction of a percent, meaning users with any of these CPUs should expect effectively the same frame rates in this game when paired with the same GPU.

For the GPU, the Arc B580's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (-0.2%), which is an older but surprisingly close performer in synthetic benchmarks. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (+0.6%) and RTX 3080 (-0.7%) are also in the same performance band, with the RTX 3080 slightly slower in average score despite being a higher-tier product in other contexts. The NVIDIA P106-100 (-1%) is the weakest of the listed rivals. In practice, swapping the Arc B580 for any of these GPUs would yield similar FPS numbers in Fivem, though driver-level differences in specific games could shift the ranking by a few percent.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore of 22366) allows the Arc B580 to stretch its legs, with the Low preset hitting 151.1 FPS. This suggests that at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor even at lower settings, as the CPU has ample headroom. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (151.1 to 72.5 FPS) is a 52% reduction, which is a typical GPU-bound pattern.

At 2560x1440, the GPU load increases further. The High preset at 1440p (60.3 FPS) is exactly at the playable threshold, while the same preset at 1080p (97.9 FPS) shows a 38% drop. This indicates that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being taxed more heavily. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate differences between presets are proportionally similar to 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant constraint. Even the Low preset (55.1 FPS) cannot reach 60 FPS, meaning no amount of CPU headroom can compensate for the pixel throughput required. The Ultra preset at 4K (26.9 FPS) is less than half of the 1080p Ultra figure (72.5 FPS), while the CPU's workload per frame does not increase with resolution in a meaningful way. The conclusion is straightforward: for this game, the Arc B580 defines the performance ceiling at 1440p and above, while the Ryzen 7 5700X3D provides sufficient headroom to avoid limiting frame rates at any resolution below 4K.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at 1920x1080 with all presets playable, including Ultra at 72.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding playable option at 60.3 FPS, with Low (98 FPS) and Medium (80.7 FPS) also clearing the threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p (49 FPS) is not playable. At 3840x2160, no settings achieve 60 FPS, with the best case being Low at 55.1 FPS. The verdict is clear: this is a 1080p-centric configuration that can handle 1440p at moderate settings, but it is not a 4K gaming solution for Fivem.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding playable option, delivering an average of 72.5 FPS. This leaves a small margin above the 60 FPS threshold, so users who prefer higher frame rates for competitive play can drop to High (97.9 FPS) or Medium (122.6 FPS) for a smoother experience.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the highest playable setting, averaging 60.3 FPS. This sits right at the playable threshold, so users with variable refresh rate displays may prefer Medium (80.7 FPS) for added headroom. The Low preset (98 FPS) offers the best frame rate but sacrifices visual quality.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The closest option is Low at 55.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and would require lowering resolution or accepting sub-60 performance. The data does not support any settings recommendation at this resolution for a 60 FPS target.