Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

66%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
187 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
124 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
58 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
8.4ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 27,578
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 42 54 69
1440p QHD 58 78 97 124
1080p Full HD 92 119 147 187

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 119
1920x1080 Low 187
1920x1080 Medium 147
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Low 124
2560x1440 Medium 97
2560x1440 Ultra 58
3840x2160 High 42
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a clear picture for Fivem: this is a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles to maintain smooth performance at 4K Ultra settings. The benchmark data shows a CPU that sits in the 79th percentile of all processors and a GPU in the 61st percentile of all graphics cards, which together place this combo at rank 2050 out of 3707 tested combinations. The measured frame rates confirm that the pairing is well-balanced for most gaming scenarios, though the 4K Ultra preset falls well below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC in Fivem?

A: According to the measured FPS data, the best experience is at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, producing an average of 91.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best playable option with an average of 78.3 FPS, while 3840x2160 only reaches playable performance at Low settings with an average of 68.8 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS in 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The 3840x2160 resolution shows an average of 68.8 FPS on Low, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, Medium drops to 54.1 FPS, High falls to 41.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 32.8 FPS, none of which clear the threshold.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare to its nearest rivals in overall performance?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 27,578, which is identical to the Intel Core i5-12600K with a deltaPct of 0. It scores 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% ahead. These are effectively tied performers.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4060 sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 17,639. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17,666 with a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the HD 7790 is marginally faster. The AMD Radeon 780M trails by 0.3%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% behind respectively.

Q: Which preset offers the biggest performance jump at 1080p?

A: The data shows that switching from Ultra to Low at 1920x1080 provides the largest gain, moving from 91.7 FPS to 187.4 FPS, which is a 95.7 FPS difference. The Medium preset sits between them at 147.4 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck performance at 4K Ultra?

A: The 4K Ultra result of 32.8 FPS with the GPU in the 61st percentile suggests the graphics card is the limiting factor at this extreme preset. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores indicate it has ample headroom, while the GPU's raw throughput struggles with the pixel count at 3840x2160.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and the RTX 4060 depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads from the 5000 series architecture are more than sufficient to feed the GPU, evidenced by the massive scaling from 91.7 FPS at Ultra to 187.4 FPS at Low. This 95.7 FPS swing when reducing settings indicates that the RTX 4060 is the primary driver of performance at this resolution, as lowering graphical load directly translates to higher frame rates. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,184 and single-core score of 1,499 suggest it can keep up with the GPU's output at these frame rates without becoming a bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling pattern continues but with less dramatic jumps. The High preset produces 78.3 FPS, while Low reaches 123.8 FPS, a difference of 45.5 FPS. This narrower gap compared to 1080p indicates that the GPU is starting to feel the pressure of additional pixels, but the CPU still has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates when settings are reduced. The Medium preset at 96.9 FPS and Ultra at 57.8 FPS show a consistent progression, with the CPU remaining a capable partner rather than a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the situation shifts decisively toward the GPU being the critical component. The Ultra preset drops to 32.8 FPS, which is less than half of the 1080p Ultra result of 91.7 FPS. The Low preset at 68.8 FPS is the only playable option at 4K, and even this requires a significant reduction in visual quality. The RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth appears to be the constraint here, as the sheer pixel count at 4K overwhelms the GPU's capabilities. The CPU's performance remains consistent across resolutions, confirming that it is not the source of the 4K bottleneck.

The pattern across resolutions shows that at 1080p and 1440p, the system behaves as a balanced pairing where the GPU scales with settings and the CPU provides stable support. At 4K, the GPU becomes the sole determinant of playability, with the CPU's power being largely irrelevant to the outcome. For users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU and GPU work in harmony, but for 4K gaming, the RTX 4060's limitations are exposed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this system's performance in Fivem across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the results are uniformly strong, with even the most demanding preset clearing the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. The Low preset produces the highest average at 187.4 FPS, followed by Medium at 147.4 FPS, High at 118.9 FPS, and Ultra at 91.7 FPS. This represents a range of 95.7 FPS between the lowest and highest settings, showing that the GPU has substantial headroom at this resolution.

The 2560x1440 results show a step down in performance but remain playable across most presets. Low settings yield 123.8 FPS, which is still well above the threshold, while Medium produces 96.9 FPS and High reaches 78.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 57.8 FPS is the only sub-60 result at this resolution, falling just below the playable threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 66 FPS drop, indicating that the GPU is working harder at this pixel count but still delivers acceptable performance for most settings.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly, with only the Low preset clearing the 60 FPS mark. Low settings produce 68.8 FPS, Medium falls to 54.1 FPS, High drops to 41.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 32.8 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 36 FPS decline, with each step up in settings costing roughly 10-12 FPS on average. The Ultra preset at 32.8 FPS is less than half the speed of the 1080p Ultra result, highlighting the GPU's difficulty with 4K resolution.

Comparing the same preset across resolutions reveals the resolution scaling. At Ultra settings, 1080p produces 91.7 FPS, 1440p produces 57.8 FPS, and 4K produces 32.8 FPS. This represents a 58.9 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K, or roughly a 64% reduction in performance. At Low settings, the drop is from 187.4 FPS at 1080p to 123.8 FPS at 1440p to 68.8 FPS at 4K, a 118.6 FPS total decline. The data shows that resolution has a more significant impact at lower settings, while higher presets compress the frame rate range across resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X provide several options that would deliver nearly identical CPU performance in Fivem. The Intel Core i5-12600K matches the 5700X exactly with an average score of 27,578 and a deltaPct of 0, making it a direct substitute with equivalent multi-threaded capability. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.2% behind with a score of 27,535, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H trails by 0.3% with a score of 27,507. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% ahead at 27,636. For gaming purposes, these differences are negligible, and any of these CPUs would maintain the same frame rates observed in the measured data.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060's nearest rivals are notably weaker in absolute terms, despite having similar average scores. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17,666 with a deltaPct of -0.2%, making it marginally faster in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17,588 with a deltaPct of 0.3%, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 score 17,551 and 17,509 respectively with deltaPcts of 0.5% and 0.7%. These alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, though their architectural differences may affect real-world gaming performance beyond the synthetic scores.

The practical implication of these rival scores is that users considering a similar build could swap the 5700X for an i5-12600K or Ryzen 7 5800 without expecting any measurable change in Fivem performance. Likewise, the GPU alternatives listed would behave comparably in terms of raw throughput, though the RTX 4060's feature set, including its Ada Lovelace architecture and 24 RT cores, offers advantages in other titles that these rivals may lack. For Fivem specifically, the benchmark data indicates that any of these combinations would produce results within a fraction of a percent of the measured figures.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and RTX 4060 combination ranks 2050 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the middle of the pack for overall performance. This ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing, where the CPU's 79th percentile standing and the GPU's 61st percentile standing combine to produce a system that is neither at the top nor the bottom of the tested configurations. The rank of 2050 out of 3707 means that roughly 55% of tested combos perform better, while 45% perform worse, putting this system slightly below the median.

The discrepancy between the CPU and GPU percentiles explains this mid-tier ranking. The 5700X is a strong processor that outperforms most CPUs in the database, but the RTX 4060 is only mid-range relative to other GPUs. This imbalance means the system's overall ranking is dragged down by the GPU, as the CPU's potential is not fully utilized in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K Ultra. In Fivem specifically, the game's mechanics and the measured frame rates show that the GPU is often the limiting factor, which explains why the combo does not rank higher despite the capable CPU.

The ranking also reflects the playability results across resolutions. At 1080p and 1440p, the system performs well, with multiple playable settings at each resolution. At 4K, only Low settings are playable, which is a significant limitation. Combos ranked higher than 2050 likely feature more powerful GPUs that can handle 4K Ultra or better, while those ranked lower may struggle even at 1080p. The 2050th position represents a system that is competent for mainstream gaming but not exceptional for high-end or 4K scenarios.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and RTX 4060 can run Fivem, and the verdict by resolution confirms that this system is capable of delivering smooth gameplay at most settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra producing 91.7 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. The best settings at this resolution are Ultra, offering the highest visual quality while maintaining playable frame rates. For users with 1080p monitors, this system is fully capable of maxing out the game's settings.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best playable option with an average of 78.3 FPS. The Low and Medium presets are also playable at 123.8 FPS and 96.9 FPS respectively, but Ultra falls short at 57.8 FPS. The verdict lists High as the best setting, which provides a good balance of visual fidelity and performance. Users with 1440p displays should target High settings for the optimal experience, and can drop to Medium or Low for higher frame rates if desired.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, producing 68.8 FPS. The High and Medium presets fall well below the threshold at 41.7 FPS and 54.1 FPS respectively, while Ultra is unplayable at 32.8 FPS. The verdict indicates that Low is the best playable setting at 4K, but users should be aware that this requires a significant sacrifice in visual quality. For 4K gaming, this system is only viable at the lowest preset, and even then, the frame rate margin above 60 FPS is slim. The data clearly shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers strong performance across all settings.