Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and an Intel Arc B370 sits at rank 3420 out of 3707 tested combos in the database for Fivem. That places it in the lower 8th percentile of all recorded system pairings, meaning roughly 92% of tested configurations deliver higher average frame rates in this title. The ranking reflects a fundamental mismatch: the CPU is a strong mid-range desktop processor, while the GPU is an integrated graphics solution with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, which lands in the 5th percentile among all GPUs. For a multiplayer game like Fivem, where frame consistency matters for responsiveness, this pairing is heavily constrained by the graphics side.

The CPU itself performs well in synthetic benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13184 and single-core score of 1499 indicate solid processing power. The Geekbench multi-core result of 10779 and single-core result of 2016 reinforce this. However, the GPU's 3DMark score of 1184 is the bottleneck. The database's measured FPS numbers confirm this: at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo averages 80 FPS, but at Ultra settings, that drops to 39 FPS. The gap between the CPU's capability and the GPU's deliverable frame rate is stark. The combo rank of 3420 out of 3707 suggests that many other pairings, even those with weaker CPUs, achieve better results in Fivem simply because they have more capable graphics hardware.

What is interesting is that the CPU ranks in the 79th percentile among all CPUs, yet the combo ranks near the bottom. This indicates that the GPU's performance ceiling is the defining factor. The recorded data shows no resolution or preset where this combo reaches 60 FPS above 1920x1080 Medium. The verdict by resolution confirms that only at 1920x1080 with Low or Medium settings does the system cross the 60 FPS playable threshold. The rank is a direct consequence of that limited envelope.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no tested preset reaches 60 FPS. The highest average frame rate recorded is 29 FPS at Low settings. Medium settings produce 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26, while High drops to 18 FPS and Ultra bottoms out at 14 FPS. The verdict for this resolution lists no playable settings, meaning none clear the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but remains below the playable mark. Low settings average 53 FPS, which is close but still short of 60. Medium averages 41 FPS with a range of 35 to 48. High runs at 33 FPS, and Ultra falls to 26 FPS. The verdict again lists no playable settings for this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system finally reaches playable territory. Low settings average 80 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72, also clearing the threshold. High settings drop to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The best playable setting here is Medium, at 63 FPS average, since it is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Low is also playable but offers lower visual quality. For users who prefer maximum smoothness, Low at 80 FPS is the safer choice, but Medium provides a better balance of visuals and performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows an extreme asymmetry in how much each component contributes to Fivem's frame rate. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X with 8 cores and 16 threads, has benchmark scores that place it far above the GPU's percentile. The GPU, an Intel Arc B370 with 1280 shading units and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, is an integrated part with a 25 W TDP and system shared memory. The GPU's performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad is 1184, while the CPU's average benchmark score is 27578. That gap of more than 23 times in raw score, though from different test suites, illustrates the imbalance.

Looking at the measured FPS across resolutions, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, going from Low to Ultra costs 41 FPS (80 down to 39). At 2560x1440, the same settings swing costs 27 FPS (53 down to 26). At 3840x2160, the drop is 15 FPS (29 down to 14). The scaling between resolutions shows how quickly the GPU saturates. At 1920x1080 Low, the system hits 80 FPS, but at 2560x1440 Low, it falls to 53 FPS, a 34% reduction. Moving to 3840x2160 Low drops further to 29 FPS, another 45% reduction. This pattern is consistent with a GPU that cannot handle increasing pixel counts, regardless of CPU headroom.

The CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is less stressed. At 1920x1080 Low, the 80 FPS average suggests the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the GPU still caps the output. At 1920x1080 Medium, the average drops to 63 FPS, indicating that the GPU is now the bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread score of 921 in 3DMark and 1499 in Cinebench R23 are strong enough for most games, but Fivem's multiplayer nature can be CPU-heavy. However, the measured data does not show any scenario where the CPU limits frame rates below the GPU's capability. The conclusion is that the GPU dictates performance at all resolutions and presets tested. The CPU is never the weak link in this pairing for Fivem.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i5-12600K, which has an identical average score of 27578 and a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, just 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27507, 0.3% higher. These CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem. If the GPU were upgraded, any of these processors would behave similarly, so the choice among them would not meaningfully change frame rates.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all significantly older and weaker parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, a 0.2% difference. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. These GPUs are all within 2% of the Arc B370's 3DMark score. In practice, swapping the Arc B370 for any of these would yield almost identical FPS in Fivem, within the margin of measurement error. The data suggests that the Arc B370 performs like a graphics solution from over a decade ago, which explains the low combo rank.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded measurements are as follows. Low settings produce an average of 29 FPS with no minimum or maximum recorded. Medium settings average 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26. High settings average 18 FPS. Ultra settings average 14 FPS. None of these presets approach the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, Low settings average 53 FPS. Medium settings average 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48. High settings average 33 FPS. Ultra settings average 26 FPS. The closest to playable is Low at 53 FPS, but it still falls short by 7 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the full range is visible. Low settings average 80 FPS. Medium settings average 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. High settings average 50 FPS. Ultra settings average 39 FPS. The minimum at Medium, 54 FPS, is below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating some frame dips even at the playable preset. The maximum at Medium, 72 FPS, shows that the system can exceed the threshold when the scene is less demanding. Low settings, with an average of 80 FPS, are more likely to stay consistently above 60 FPS, though no minimum is recorded for that preset.

The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: each settings tier costs roughly 15 to 20 FPS. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Medium is 17 FPS, between Medium and High is 13 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 11 FPS. At 2560x1440, the gaps are 12, 8, and 7 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, the gaps are 6, 5, and 4 FPS. As resolution increases, the absolute differences shrink because the GPU is already near its limit.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The answer depends on the resolution and settings. At 3840x2160, no preset clears 60 FPS. The best average is 29 FPS at Low, which is playable in a loose sense but not smooth. At 2560x1440, the same applies: no preset reaches 60 FPS, with Low averaging 53 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system can run the game at 60 FPS or above with Low or Medium settings. Low averages 80 FPS, and Medium averages 63 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms this: playable settings exist only at 1920x1080, with Medium being the best playable preset at 63 FPS average.

For users with a 1080p display, this combo is adequate for Fivem at Medium settings. The 63 FPS average is above the 60 FPS threshold, though the recorded minimum of 54 FPS suggests occasional dips below 60 in busy scenes. For users with a 1440p or 4K display, the system will not provide a smooth experience at any settings. The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, and no CPU-side adjustment can overcome that. The recommendation is to stick with 1080p and Medium settings for a balanced experience, or drop to Low for a higher average frame rate. Upgrading the GPU would be the only meaningful change, as the CPU has ample headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average is 80 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Medium settings, the average is 63 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 2560x1440?

A: No. The best average at 2560x1440 is 53 FPS at Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. No preset at this resolution is marked as playable in the verdict.

Q: Which component limits performance more in this pairing?

A: The GPU. The Intel Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27578, in the 79th percentile. The measured FPS drops sharply with resolution and settings, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck at all tested points.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600K has an identical average score of 27578, a 0% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27507, 0.3% higher. Any of these would perform similarly in CPU-bound tasks.

Q: What settings should be used at 1920x1080 for a smooth experience?

A: Medium settings average 63 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 80 FPS and provide a larger margin. High and Ultra settings drop to 50 FPS and 39 FPS respectively, so they are not recommended.

Q: Is there any setting at 3840x2160 that reaches 60 FPS?

A: No. The highest average at 3840x2160 is 29 FPS at Low settings. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. None approach the playable threshold.