Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is an unusual combination—a mid-range 8-core CPU from 2021 with a flagship-tier GPU from 2022. In Fivem, this pairing lands at rank 318 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it comfortably in the top 9% of all tested systems. The data shows this combo is substantially stronger than the average tested rig, but the question is whether the older CPU becomes a bottleneck at lower resolutions where the RTX 4080 would otherwise run unconstrained.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 318 out of 3707 tested combinations puts this system in the 91st percentile of all tested pairings. That is a strong result, but not a dominant one—the ranking suggests that while the RTX 4080 is a top-tier GPU (86th percentile among all GPUs), the Ryzen 7 5700G (79th percentile among all CPUs) holds the overall result back slightly. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by 3DMark single-thread score of 899, is competent but not elite; the RTX 4080 is clearly the more capable component in this pairing.

What the data implies is that this combo sits in a peculiar middle ground. It outperforms the vast majority of tested systems, but it is not near the top of the leaderboard. The 3707 combos in the database include many with newer, higher-end CPUs paired with similar or better GPUs. The Ryzen 7 5700G’s Zen 3 architecture, while efficient, does not match the raw throughput of newer processors in CPU-bound scenarios. Still, the rank shows that the RTX 4080 does heavy lifting—this is not a balanced system, but it is a fast one.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: this combo is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at 4K, but becomes increasingly CPU-bound as resolution drops. At 3840x2160, the average FPS across settings ranges from 60 (Ultra) to 122 (Low). The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 62 FPS, which indicates the GPU is the primary constraint—the RTX 4080 is working hard to push pixels at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the range expands to 107–219 FPS, and at 1920x1080, it stretches to 163–289 FPS. The scaling between resolutions is steep: from 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average FPS drops from 289 to 122, a 58% reduction. This scaling is typical of a GPU-limited scenario, where pixel throughput dictates performance.

However, the CPU’s role becomes more evident when comparing preset scaling within a resolution. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra drops the average FPS from 289 to 163—a 44% reduction. At 4K, the same preset change drops FPS from 122 to 60—a 51% reduction. The similar percentage drops across resolutions suggest that both CPU and GPU are contributing to the performance ceiling, but the absolute numbers tell a different story. At 1080p Low, 289 FPS is extremely high; the CPU is keeping up with the GPU’s output. At 4K Ultra, 60 FPS is exactly at the playable threshold, indicating the GPU is maxed out. The data shows that the Ryzen 7 5700G is sufficient for this game at all tested settings, but the RTX 4080 is the component that determines whether you hit 60 FPS or 289 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G holding back the RTX 4080 in Fivem?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 289 FPS average, which is high enough that the CPU is likely the limiting factor—but not by much. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 60 FPS, where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The data suggests the CPU does not prevent playable frame rates at any tested setting; it only caps the maximum achievable FPS in lighter GPU loads.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, but just barely. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold. There is no min or max FPS recorded for this setting, so frame pacing is unknown, but the average is playable.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rivals in this game?

A: The RTX 4080 scores an average benchmark of 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209) and 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6% higher than the RTX 4080. These deltas are small, meaning in-game performance would be nearly identical across these GPUs.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maximize FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, the combo reaches 289 FPS average on Low settings and 163 FPS on Ultra. This is the highest frame rate across all resolutions. If the goal is maximum FPS, 1080p is the clear choice. If the goal is visual quality, 2560x1440 Ultra still delivers 107 FPS average.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5700G’s integrated graphics affect performance in Fivem?

A: The CPU includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, but the RTX 4080 is the active GPU in this system. The benchmark data measures the combo with the discrete GPU, so the integrated graphics do not contribute to the measured FPS. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are the relevant specs for processing game logic.

Q: Is this combo better or worse than a Ryzen 7 5700G with a different GPU?

A: The database only provides data for this specific CPU-GPU pairing. However, the CPU’s nearest rivals—Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, Intel Core i5-14400T, and Intel Core i7-1370P—all have similar average benchmark scores (within 0.6%), so pairing any of those CPUs with the RTX 4080 would likely produce similar frame rates in Fivem.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem at every resolution and preset tested. The verdict data confirms that all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is exactly 60, which clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, the average is 107 FPS, providing headroom above the threshold. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 163 FPS, which is far beyond what a 60 Hz display would need. The only concern is the 4K Ultra result: an average of 60 FPS with no recorded minimum means there is a risk of drops below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. For a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer mod for Grand Theft Auto V, the data indicates this is a capable system for all tested configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 122 FPS average (no min/max recorded)
• Medium: 96 FPS average, 82 FPS min, 110 FPS max
• High: 77 FPS average (no min/max recorded)
• Ultra: 60 FPS average (no min/max recorded)

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 219 FPS average (no min/max recorded)
• Medium: 173 FPS average, 147 FPS min, 199 FPS max
• High: 138 FPS average (no min/max recorded)
• Ultra: 107 FPS average (no min/max recorded)

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 289 FPS average (no min/max recorded)
• Medium: 263 FPS average, 223 FPS min, 302 FPS max
• High: 210 FPS average (no min/max recorded)
• Ultra: 163 FPS average (no min/max recorded)

The Medium settings are the only ones with complete min/max data, which is notable. At 1080p Medium, the min FPS of 223 is still far above the playable threshold. At 1440p Medium, the min of 147 provides a comfortable buffer. At 4K Medium, the min of 82 is solid. These minimums suggest that even in stress scenarios, the combo does not dip below 60 FPS at Medium settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 60 FPS exactly. This is the maximum visual quality available in the test, and it meets the playable threshold. There is no headroom, but the data shows it is playable.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best setting, delivering 107 FPS average. This provides 47 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a safe choice for high refresh rate displays up to 100 Hz.

At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 163 FPS average, which is ideal for 144 Hz or even 165 Hz monitors. The minimum FPS for Ultra is not recorded, but the average is so high that even a significant drop would likely stay above 60 FPS. The Medium setting shows a min of 223 FPS, so Ultra is likely to have a min well above 100 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, are all within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 5700G’s score of 27051. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936 (0.4% lower), the Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i7-1370P scores 26900 (0.6% lower). Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical FPS in Fivem when paired with the RTX 4080. The i9-9900K is a particularly interesting alternative because it is an older high-end chip, while the i5-14400T and i7-1370P are newer mobile/desktop hybrid parts.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080’s closest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54209 (0.1% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (2.6% higher). The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (2.7% higher). These small deltas mean that swapping the RTX 4080 for any of these GPUs would not meaningfully change Fivem performance—they would all fall within a few FPS of each other in real-world gameplay. The data suggests that if you were building a similar system, the GPU choice between these options would come down to features like ray tracing performance or driver preferences, not raw FPS in this game.