Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
128 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
47 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 27,051
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 62 72 93
1440p QHD 85 108 137 172
1080p Full HD 128 163 207 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 163
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 207
1920x1080 Ultra 128
2560x1440 High 108
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 137
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 62
3840x2160 Low 93
3840x2160 Medium 72
3840x2160 Ultra 47

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a robust Fivem experience, with the data indicating that 4K gaming is viable only at High settings, while 1440p and 1080p resolutions allow for maximum Ultra settings with substantial performance headroom. Benchmark results show the pairing excels in high-refresh-rate scenarios at 1080p and 1440p, making it a strong contender for multiplayer sessions where frame rates are critical.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on aggregate benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G sits within a tight performance band of several competing processors. The closest rival is the Intel Core i9-9900K, which posts an average score of 27097 against the 5700G's 27051, a negligible delta of -0.2%. This means in CPU-bound scenarios, users switching between these two chips would observe virtually identical frame pacing. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is marginally ahead at 26936 with a +0.4% delta, while the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166) and Intel Core i7-1370P (26900) round out the immediate competition with deltas of -0.4% and +0.6% respectively. For Fivem, which can be sensitive to single-thread performance, the 5700G's 3dmark_single_thread score of 899 and Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1494 indicate it will hold its own against these rivals, though the i9-9900K's similar aggregate score suggests no clear winner in CPU-heavy moments.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070's nearest rivals are a mixed bag. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628) is essentially identical with a +0.1% delta, making it a theoretical stand-in for compute workloads, though its professional orientation means it lacks the RTX 4070's gaming-focused features like 46 RT cores and 184 Tensor cores. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507) trails by 0.4%, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) leads by -1.3%, indicating that desktop RTX 4070 owners get near-mobile-flagship performance. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157) is 1.3% behind. For Fivem specifically, the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures, a factor that the lower-bandwidth rivals like the Vega 56 cannot match, even if their raw compute scores are similar.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured FPS data establishes clear optimal settings for each resolution, all anchored to the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 3840x2160, the verdict is straightforward: High settings deliver an average of 62 FPS, which is the only preset above the playable line among the higher tiers. Ultra settings drop to 46.6 FPS, which is unplayable by the benchmark's standard, while Medium (71.6 FPS) and Low (93.2 FPS) are technically playable but leave performance on the table. The data shows that High is the sweet spot for 4K, offering a 15.4 FPS advantage over Ultra while staying just 9.6 FPS below Medium's frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the RTX 4070's headroom becomes evident. Ultra settings achieve 84.5 FPS, comfortably above the threshold and representing a 34% improvement over the 4K Ultra result. This resolution allows players to enable every visual option without sacrificing smoothness. The scaling from High (107.9 FPS) to Ultra (84.5 FPS) shows a 23.4 FPS cost for maxing out settings, but the final result remains well within high-refresh-rate territory.

The 1920x1080 resolution is where this combo truly shines. Ultra settings produce 128.3 FPS, which is more than double the playability threshold. The gap between Medium (206.6 FPS) and Ultra (128.3 FPS) is substantial, but even the most demanding preset leaves 68.3 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS floor. Low settings at 258.3 FPS approach the limits of most 240Hz monitors, making this the resolution for competitive play. The data indicates that 1080p Ultra is the recommended configuration, as it balances visual fidelity with a frame rate that exceeds most displays' refresh rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 5700G and RTX 4070 across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint. The frame rate drop from Medium (71.6 FPS) to Ultra (46.6 FPS) represents a 25 FPS penalty, which is a 34.9% reduction in performance. This steep decline indicates that the RTX 4070's pixel throughput is the limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU's 16 threads have ample time to feed the GPU between frames. The 5700G's 3dmark_max_threads score of 6627 suggests it can handle the draw calls and physics calculations typical of Fivem's multiplayer environments without becoming the bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The CPU's influence becomes more apparent as frame rates rise. The jump from 4K High (62 FPS) to 1440p High (107.9 FPS) is a 74% increase, which is less than the proportional pixel reduction (2.25x fewer pixels). This suggests that at 1440p, the CPU begins to assert its role, though the GPU still carries most of the load. The 5700G's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and PassMark multithread result of 24419 indicate it can sustain the higher frame rates, but the scaling from 1440p to 1080p provides the clearest evidence of CPU involvement.

At 1920x1080, the CPU becomes a co-equal partner. The frame rate at High settings (163.2 FPS) is 51% higher than at 1440p High (107.9 FPS), despite only a 56% pixel reduction. This near-linear scaling means the RTX 4070 is still the primary driver, but the 5700G's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread: 899, Geekbench single-core: 1894) is sufficient to avoid capping the GPU. The 258.3 FPS result at 1080p Low is telling: this frame rate is likely approaching the CPU's practical limit, as the GPU has minimal work per frame at this setting. The data shows that at 1080p, the 5700G's Zen 3 architecture is fully utilized, and any further frame rate gains would require a stronger processor.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K in Fivem?

A: Yes, but only at High settings, which produce an average of 62 FPS. Medium (71.6 FPS) and Low (93.2 FPS) also exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 46.6 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play with this hardware?

A: 1920x1080 is optimal, as even Ultra settings deliver 128.3 FPS. For maximum frame rates, Low settings reach 258.3 FPS, which is suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 5700G's average benchmark score of 27051 is within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, Intel Core i5-14400T, and Intel Core i7-1370P, making all four chips interchangeable in terms of raw performance.

Q: Is the RTX 4070's performance close to any other GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070's average score of 37648 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, +0.1%) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507, +0.4%). The RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% faster, while the Radeon PRO W6400 is 1.3% slower.

Q: Which component limits performance at 1440p Ultra?

A: The GPU remains the primary constraint, as 1440p Ultra produces 84.5 FPS. The CPU's 16 threads are sufficient to support this frame rate, but the 34% drop from 1440p High (107.9 FPS) to Ultra indicates the graphics card is the bottleneck.

Q: What is the playable settings range at 4K?

A: The playable settings at 3840x2160 are High, Medium, and Low, with average frame rates of 62, 71.6, and 93.2 FPS respectively. Ultra is the only setting that fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete FPS dataset reveals consistent scaling patterns across all resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rates range from 46.6 FPS at Ultra to 93.2 FPS at Low. The progression from Low to Medium to High shows incremental gains: Medium (71.6 FPS) is 21.6 FPS slower than Low, and High (62 FPS) is 9.6 FPS slower than Medium. Ultra's 46.6 FPS represents a 15.4 FPS drop from High, the steepest penalty in the 4K tier.

At 2560x1440, the spread widens considerably. Low settings achieve 171.8 FPS, which is 84.6% higher than the 4K Low result. Medium (136.9 FPS) trails Low by 34.9 FPS, while High (107.9 FPS) is 29 FPS behind Medium. Ultra (84.5 FPS) closes the gap at 23.4 FPS below High. The 1440p results show that each settings tier costs between 23 and 35 FPS, a relatively uniform penalty that suggests balanced GPU workload scaling.

The 1920x1080 results are the most dramatic. Low settings produce 258.3 FPS, which is the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. Medium (206.6 FPS) is 51.7 FPS lower, High (163.2 FPS) is 43.4 FPS lower than Medium, and Ultra (128.3 FPS) is 34.9 FPS lower than High. The diminishing returns are clear: the gap between Low and Medium (51.7 FPS) is larger than the gap between High and Ultra (34.9 FPS), indicating that the RTX 4070 handles the higher settings more efficiently relative to the lowest preset.

Across all resolutions, the data shows no anomalies in frame pacing. The minimum and maximum FPS fields are null in the dataset, but the average values are consistent with expected scaling behavior. The 1080p Low result of 258.3 FPS is particularly noteworthy, as it approaches the theoretical limit for the 5700G's CPU throughput, while the 4K Ultra result of 46.6 FPS clearly demonstrates the GPU's limitations at the highest pixel count.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 903rd out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 24.4% of all configurations. This percentile ranking is consistent with the individual components' performance: the CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, and the GPU is at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The combo's rank suggests that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the tested systems in this specific game.

Benchmark results indicate that the combo's ranking is driven primarily by the GPU's strong showing. The RTX 4070's PassMark G3D score of 26927 and Geekbench Vulkan result of 174152 demonstrate high compute capability, which translates directly to the frame rates observed at 1440p and 1080p. The CPU's contribution is more modest but still solid: the 5700G's PassMark multithread score of 24419 and Cinebench R23 multicore result of 12830.5 ensure that it does not hold back the GPU in most scenarios.

The rank of 903 suggests that Fivem's multiplayer nature favors the combination's strengths. The game's reliance on CPU-bound logic for player interactions and physics is well-served by the 5700G's 8 cores and 16 threads, while the RTX 4070's 12 GB memory buffer prevents texture streaming bottlenecks. Compared to the 3707 total combos, this pairing is positioned above the median but below the top 900 configurations, indicating that users seeking higher ranks would need either a faster CPU like the Intel Core i9-9900K (which is only 0.2% faster) or a more powerful GPU. The data shows that for most players, this combo's 903rd-place rank is more than sufficient, as the 60 FPS threshold is met or exceeded at every resolution except 4K Ultra.