Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 46 | 56 | 70 | 90 |
| 1440p QHD | 81 | 104 | 128 | 167 |
| 1080p Full HD | 124 | 159 | 195 | 251 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Can AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 run Fivem? The measured data indicates this combination delivers a wide performance envelope, ranging from a demanding 45.6 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 251 FPS at 1080p Low. The benchmark results position this combo at rank 1071 out of 3707 tested configurations, placing it in the upper third of all systems evaluated for this multiplayer titleenum. The pattern across resolutions reveals a system that is exceptionally capable at 1440p and 1080p, while 4K requires careful settings management to maintain playability.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the performance curve shows a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate. With Low settings, the combo produces an average of 90.1 FPS, which drops to 70.3 FPS at Medium. High settings yield 56.4 FPS, while Ultra pushes the system to its limit at 45.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 44.5 FPS, indicating that the render resolution at 4K is the dominant factor, with settings scaling having a substantial impact on the final output. The 4K Ultra result falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold, while Medium comfortably exceeds it.
Moving to 2560x1440, the system demonstrates significantly more headroom. Low settings produce an impressive 166.5 FPS, Medium reaches 128.4 FPS, and High achieves 103.6 FPS. Even Ultra maintains a solid 80.9 FPS, which is more than 20 FPS above the playability threshold. The step from 4K to 1440p represents a massive improvement in performance, with the Low settings figure jumping from 90.1 to 166.5 FPS, a 76.4 FPS increase. This suggests that the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K, while at 1440p it has ample resources to spare.
At 1920x1080, the combination becomes nearly untouchable. Low settings hit 251 FPS, Medium delivers 194.5 FPS, and High still produces 158.6 FPS. Ultra remains well above the threshold at 123.7 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 1080p is less dramatic than from 4K to 1440p, which indicates the system is approaching a CPU or engine-level limit at lower resolutions. The difference between Ultra at 1080p (123.7 FPS) and Ultra at 1440p (80.9 FPS) is 42.8 FPS, showing that even at the highest preset, resolution still matters considerably.
The data reveals a consistent pattern where each settings tier at a given resolution costs roughly 15-25 FPS. The 4K High result at 56.4 FPS is the only non-Low or Medium preset that fails to reach 60 FPS, making it the critical borderline case. Across all resolutions and settings, the measured FPS values are average figures; no minimum or maximum FPS data was captured, so frame-time consistency cannot be assessed from this dataset.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: Yes, but only with reduced settings. The verdict data shows that Low (90.1 FPS) and Medium (70.3 FPS) are playable at 3840x2160, while High (56.4 FPS) and Ultra (45.6 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p for this combo?
A: The system can run Ultra settings at 2560x1440 with an average of 80.9 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for maximum visual quality at that resolution.
Q: How much performance does the system lose when moving from 1080p to 1440p?
A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 123.7 at 1920x1080 to 80.9 at 2560x1440, representing a reduction of 42.8 FPS. This 34.6% decrease in frame rate highlights the significant GPU load increase at higher resolutions.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p. The jump from Low (251 FPS) to Ultra (123.7 FPS) at 1080p is less pronounced than the resolution scaling, indicating the frame rate ceiling is not purely GPU-bound at lower resolutions.
Q: What percentile does this CPU hold compared to all tested CPUs?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs in the benchmark database, with an average benchmark score of 25517. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, scores 25530, a delta of -0.1%.
Q: Does the GPU outperform the CPU in relative standing?
A: The RTX 3080 is at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 23172. The CPU's 78th percentile is 10 percentage points higher, suggesting the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card when compared to their respective peer groups.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of an AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 achieves rank 1071 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places the system in the 71st percentile of all configurations tested, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of systems while being surpassed by the remaining 29%. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this pairing: the CPU at the 78th percentile and GPU at the 68th percentile combine to produce a result that is slightly below the CPU's relative standing but above the GPU's.
Interpretation of the rank requires considering the game's multiplayer nature. Fivem's large player counts and dynamic world can shift bottlenecks between CPU and GPU depending on the server and scene complexity. The 1071 rank suggests this combo sits comfortably in the upper echelon, but the 3707 total combos indicate a highly competitive field. The measured FPS at 1440p Ultra (80.9) and 1080p Ultra (123.7) both exceed the playability threshold with significant margin, which reinforces the rank as indicative of a genuinely capable system for this title.
The delta between this combo's rank and the theoretical maximum is substantial, but the practical impact is minimal for most players. The data shows that the system only fails to hit 60 FPS at 4K High and Ultra settings, which are extreme use cases. For the vast majority of gaming scenarios, this rank translates to a smooth experience with headroom for fluctuations in multiplayer environments.
The Verdict
The verdict by resolution is clear: this PC can run Fivem at all three tested resolutions, but with caveats at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 123.7 FPS and Low reaching 251 FPS. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold by at least 63.7 FPS at 1080p, making it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS at every preset. The most demanding option, Ultra, delivers 80.9 FPS, which provides a 20.9 FPS buffer above the playability threshold. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and performance, as players can enable maximum settings without worrying about frame rate drops.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is conditional. Low (90.1 FPS) and Medium (70.3 FPS) are playable, but High (56.4 FPS) and Ultra (45.6 FPS) are not. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium with an average of 70.3 FPS, which is the recommended configuration for 4K displays. Players seeking higher fidelity at 4K would need to accept sub-60 FPS performance, which the data indicates is not ideal for this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provide context for CPU performance. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530, a delta of -0.1% from this CPU's 25517 average, meaning they perform nearly identically. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485, a 0.1% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550, a -0.1% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U rounds out the group with 25446, a 0.3% delta. All four rivals are within 0.3% of the Ryzen 7 5700's average score, indicating that any of these processors would deliver virtually indistinguishable FPS results in Fivem.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, a -0.3% delta from the RTX 3080's 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 also scores 23250, a -0.3% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, a -0.4% delta. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, also at -0.4% delta. These four GPUs would produce frame rates within a fraction of a percent of the RTX 3080, making them viable substitutes if the user already owns one of these cards. However, the RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs shows it still outperforms the majority of graphics cards in the database.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 70.3 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K displays, as it provides a 10.3 FPS buffer above the playability threshold while offering better visual quality than Low's 90.1 FPS.
For 2560x1440, Ultra is the best choice, achieving 80.9 FPS. This preset provides the highest visual fidelity while still maintaining a 20.9 FPS margin above 60 FPS. The next step down, High at 103.6 FPS, offers additional headroom but at the cost of visual quality.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is also the recommended setting, with an average of 123.7 FPS. This provides a 63.7 FPS buffer above the threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming. Players with 144Hz or 240Hz monitors could experiment with High (158.6 FPS) or Medium (194.5 FPS) to push frame rates even higher, but Ultra already exceeds the needs of most displays.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions reveals which component dominates in Fivem. From 4K Ultra (45.6 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (80.9 FPS), the performance improves by 35.3 FPS, a 77.4% increase. From 1440p Ultra to 1080p Ultra (123.7 FPS), the gain is 42.8 FPS, a 52.9% increase. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, where the RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are heavily taxed. The diminishing returns from 1440p to 1080p suggest the CPU begins to matter more at lower resolutions.
The settings scaling further clarifies component roles. At 4K, the difference between Low (90.1 FPS) and Ultra (45.6 FPS) is 44.5 FPS, showing that GPU compute is the limiting factor. At 1080p, the same settings range produces 251 to 123.7 FPS, a 127.3 FPS difference, but the absolute values are much higherable. The 1080p Low result of 251 FPS approaches the CPU's single-thread ceiling, as the Ryzen 7 5700's 3dmark single-thread score of 901 suggests the processor can only sustain so many frames per second regardless of GPU headroom.
The data implies that at 4K, the RTX 3080's capabilities define the experience, with the CPU providing sufficient throughput to avoid becoming a bottleneck. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the CPU, but the GPU still has significant influence, as evidenced by the 80.9 FPS Ultra result. At 1080p, the CPU's role becomes more prominent, though the GPU still limits the higher presets. For multiplayer scenarios with many players, the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, along with its 78th percentile ranking, provide the parallel processing headroom needed to maintain stable frame rates when the game world is complex. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking is sufficient for single-player moments, but players seeking maximum FPS at 1080p may find the CPU to be the more relevant component for Fivem's unique workload.