Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination of AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B390 running Fivem shows a clear performance ceiling that varies heavily by resolution and preset level. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in the lower preset tiers. The Low preset averages 88 FPS, which is the highest recorded result across all configurations. Medium follows at 70 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS. High drops to 56 FPS average, while Ultra falls to 43 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 45 FPS, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor once settings are raised.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance declines substantially. Low preset averages 58 FPS, just two frames short of the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium averages 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53. High averages 37 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 29 FPS, a smaller spread than at 1080p but still significant. None of the presets at this resolution reach the 60 FPS threshold, and the minimum recorded frame rate at Medium (39 FPS) suggests noticeable stutter during demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, performance drops further. Low averages 32 FPS, Medium averages 25 FPS with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 29, High averages 20 FPS, and Ultra averages 16 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra here is only 16 FPS, showing that the GPU is saturated even at the lowest settings. The recorded minimum of 22 FPS at Medium indicates that this resolution is far from playable regardless of preset selection.

The data shows a consistent pattern: resolution scaling has a larger impact on FPS than preset scaling. Moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low costs 30 FPS (from 88 to 58), while moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low costs another 26 FPS (from 58 to 32). In contrast, moving from Low to Ultra at a fixed resolution costs 45 FPS at 1080p, 29 FPS at 1440p, and 16 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are the primary constraints at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS on 1920x1080?

A: Yes, at Low and Medium presets. Low averages 88 FPS and Medium averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS. High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS, averaging 56 FPS and 43 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: None of the presets reach 60 FPS at this resolution. The closest is Low at 58 FPS average, which is below the playability threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B390 scores 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463), 1.5% ahead of the GeForce 800M (1460), 2.5% ahead of the GT 625 OEM (1446), and 2.7% ahead of the GT 710 (1443).

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark standing relative to other processors?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 sits in the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 25517, which is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25530, 0.1% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25550, 0.1% behind). It is slightly ahead of the Ryzen 5 7640U (25485, 0.1% ahead) and the Ryzen 7 5825U (25446, 0.3% ahead).

Q: Does the game run at 4K with any preset?

A: No. The highest average at 3840x2160 is 32 FPS on Low, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 25 FPS, High 20 FPS, and Ultra 16 FPS.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Medium and High at 1920x1080?

A: Medium averages 70 FPS while High averages 56 FPS, a difference of 14 FPS. This is a notable drop for one preset step up.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B390 ranks 3294 out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the lower 11% of all configurations tested for this game. The ranking reflects that while the CPU is reasonably capable, the GPU's performance is severely limiting in this title.

The combo rank is consistent with the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the system only clears the 60 FPS threshold at Low and Medium, which is a modest result for a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. The GPU's percentile ranking of 9 among all GPUs indicates that it sits near the bottom of the performance distribution, and this drags the overall combo ranking down considerably.

For context, the CPU alone ranks in the 78th percentile among all processors, but the GPU ranks in the 9th percentile among all graphics cards. This massive gap between CPU and GPU capability explains why the combo ranks so low: the processor is capable of feeding much more demanding graphics hardware, but the Arc B390 cannot translate that CPU headroom into high frame rates in this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U offer nearly identical average benchmark scores (25485 and 25446 respectively, both within 0.3% of the Ryzen 7 5700). The Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H are also within 0.1% on average score. In practice, any of these processors paired with a similarly performing GPU would produce comparable frame rates in Fivem, since the CPU is not the bottleneck in most tested scenarios.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B390's nearest rivals are all older NVIDIA parts. The GeForce GT 520MX, GeForce 800M, GeForce GT 625 OEM, and GeForce GT 710 all score within 2.7% of the Arc B390 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This means a system with any of these GPUs paired with a CPU of similar capability would deliver nearly identical FPS in Fivem. The practical implication is that this combo behaves like a system with a low-end discrete GPU from several generations ago, despite the Arc B390 being a newer integrated solution.

For users seeking similar performance, the data suggests that swapping the CPU within the same generation (for example, to a Ryzen 5 or Ryzen 7 with similar core counts) would not meaningfully change FPS, since the GPU is the limiting factor. Conversely, upgrading the GPU while keeping the Ryzen 7 5700 would yield large gains, as the CPU has substantial headroom.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 80. This is the recommended configuration for this resolution, as it balances visual quality with playable frame rates. Low also clears the threshold at 88 FPS average, but Medium provides better visuals without sacrificing smoothness.

At 2560x1440, there is no preset that reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 58 FPS average, which falls just short of the playability threshold. Medium averages 46 FPS, High 37 FPS, and Ultra 29 FPS. The data shows that even the lowest settings cannot maintain smooth gameplay at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, all presets are far below 60 FPS. Low averages 32 FPS, Medium 25 FPS, High 20 FPS, and Ultra 16 FPS. No configuration at this resolution meets the playability standard.

The recorded data indicates that 1080p Medium is the highest quality preset that delivers consistent performance above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum of 59 FPS at Medium is essentially at the threshold, meaning occasional dips just below 60 FPS may occur, but the average of 70 FPS provides enough margin for typical gameplay.

The Verdict

Based on the verdict data, this PC can run Fivem at 1920x1080 with the Low or Medium presets, with Medium being the best playable setting at 70 FPS average. Low averages 88 FPS, which offers additional headroom for demanding scenes. High and Ultra at this resolution do not reach 60 FPS, averaging 56 FPS and 43 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, the system cannot achieve 60 FPS at any preset. The best result is Low at 58 FPS, which is just below the playability threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further behind, with averages of 46, 37, and 29 FPS. The verdict data confirms that no playable settings exist at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system is completely unsuitable for 60 FPS gameplay. Even the lowest preset averages only 32 FPS, and Ultra drops to 16 FPS. This resolution is not viable for this combination.

The overall verdict is that this PC is capable of running Fivem at 1080p with medium settings, but it cannot handle higher resolutions. Users wanting 1440p or 4K gameplay would need a significantly more powerful GPU.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 7 5700 and the Arc B390 in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the CPU has sufficient headroom to drive frame rates above 60 FPS on lower presets, as evidenced by the 88 FPS Low result. However, the GPU's limitations become apparent as settings increase: the drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 45 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint at higher quality settings.

At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes even more dominant. The Low preset averages 58 FPS, which is only 30 FPS lower than 1080p Low. This 35% reduction in FPS from a resolution increase shows that the GPU's memory bandwidth (System Shared) and compute resources are insufficient for higher pixel counts. The CPU's performance remains relatively constant across resolutions, as evidenced by the fact that the difference between 1440p and 4K at Low is 26 FPS, while the difference between 1080p and 1440p at Low is 30 FPS. This consistency suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is completely saturated. The spread between Low and Ultra at this resolution is only 16 FPS, compared to 45 FPS at 1080p. This compression of the FPS range indicates that even the lowest settings cannot reduce the GPU workload enough to produce playable frame rates. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are largely idle at this resolution, waiting on the GPU to render each frame.

Across all resolutions, the scaling pattern points to the GPU as the decisive component. The CPU's benchmark scores place it in the 78th percentile, and its nearest rivals all perform within 0.3% in synthetic tests, suggesting it is not a weak link. The GPU, however, ranks in the 9th percentile and its nearest rivals are all legacy NVIDIA parts. For Fivem specifically, users should prioritize a GPU upgrade to improve frame rates at any resolution, while the Ryzen 7 5700 can be retained without concern for CPU bottlenecking.