Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

96%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
178 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
137 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
158 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
99 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
125 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
6.6ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 34,260
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 81 98 125
1440p QHD 99 133 145 158
1080p Full HD 137 152 163 178

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 152
1920x1080 Low 178
1920x1080 Medium 163
1920x1080 Ultra 137
2560x1440 High 133
2560x1440 Low 158
2560x1440 Medium 145
2560x1440 Ultra 99
3840x2160 High 81
3840x2160 Low 125
3840x2160 Medium 98
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. Its average benchmark score of 34260 places it within a narrow band of comparable processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, a delta of only 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also 0.1% behind. The Intel Core i5-13450HX leads this group with 34333, putting the Ryzen 7 3700X 0.2% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H trails with 34083, a 0.5% gap. In practical terms, these four CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem, with differences well below one percent. The Ryzen 7 3700X also holds the 84th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 84% of tested processors in aggregate benchmarks.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves an average benchmark score of 54247. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54209, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6% higher. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.7% higher. Notably, the RTX 4080 sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The recorded data indicates that all four GPU alternatives would produce essentially identical Fivem frame rates, since the largest delta is only 2.7%. The RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match, with a delta of 0.1%, meaning users swapping between these two cards would see no measurable performance difference in this game.

When considering a full system swap, the combination of Ryzen 7 3700X and RTX 4080 would behave almost exactly like any of the four CPU alternatives paired with any of the four GPU alternatives. The CPU deltas are all within 0.5%, and the GPU deltas are within 2.7%. For Fivem specifically, where the measured frame rates exceed 60 FPS at every tested setting and resolution, these differences translate to at most a few frames per second. The database shows this combo ranks 914th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top quarter of all systems tested for this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the CPU and GPU split responsibilities across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the system produces an average of 178 FPS on Low settings, 163 FPS on Medium, 152 FPS on High, and 137 FPS on Ultra. The spread from Low to Ultra is 41 FPS. At 2560x1440, the averages are 158 FPS on Low, 145 FPS on Medium, 133 FPS on High, and 99 FPS on Ultra. The spread grows to 59 FPS. At 3840x2160, the averages drop to 125 FPS on Low, 98 FPS on Medium, 81 FPS on High, and 60 FPS on Ultra. The spread becomes 65 FPS.

These numbers indicate that resolution scaling has a direct impact on the GPU load. Going from 1080p to 1440p reduces the Low setting average from 178 to 158 FPS, a drop of 11%. From 1440p to 4K, the Low setting average falls from 158 to 125 FPS, a drop of 21%. The Ultra setting shows even steeper scaling: 137 FPS at 1080p, 99 FPS at 1440p, and 60 FPS at 4K. This pattern demonstrates that the RTX 4080 becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. The GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the average exactly meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

The CPU role is more visible at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 178 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that requires substantial CPU throughput. The Ryzen 7 3700X, with 8 cores and 16 threads, provides enough processing power to feed the RTX 4080 at these rates. However, the data does not show a CPU bottleneck because even at 1080p Ultra, the system holds 137 FPS. The relative scaling between presets at a fixed resolution shows the GPU's influence: at 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 41 FPS (23% reduction), while at 4K, the same preset change costs 65 FPS (52% reduction). This larger penalty at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU workload scales with pixel count, while the CPU workload remains roughly constant. For Fivem, the CPU matters most at 1080p for achieving maximum frame rates, but the GPU becomes the decisive component at 1440p and especially at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU-GPU combination at 914 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. That places the system in the 75th percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly three-quarters of tested systems perform worse and one-quarter perform better. The rank reflects a pairing of an 84th-percentile CPU with an 86th-percentile GPU, both near the top of their respective distributions. The combination outperforms the majority of systems because both components sit above the median.

However, the rank also indicates that many other combos achieve higher Fivem frame rates. Those higher-ranked systems likely pair newer, higher-end CPUs with the RTX 4080 or equivalent GPUs, or pair the Ryzen 7 3700X with even stronger graphics cards. The 914th rank is strong but not elite. The measured FPS data supports this: at 4K Ultra, the system averages exactly 60 FPS, which is playable but leaves no headroom. At 1080p Ultra, the system averages 137 FPS, which is very smooth but not at the top tier of 200+ FPS that some competitive systems reach.

The rank also reflects the balance of the pairing. The Ryzen 7 3700X, while capable, is not the fastest CPU available, and the RTX 4080, while powerful, is not the fastest GPU. The database shows that this combo sits in the top 25% of all tested combos for Fivem, which is a solid result for a system built around these two components. For players seeking higher ranks, the data suggests that upgrading either component would yield diminishing returns because the other would then become the limiting factor. The current balance already produces 60 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is the minimum playable threshold defined in the database.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at every tested resolution and preset. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best setting being Ultra at an average of 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four settings are playable, with Ultra averaging 99 FPS. At 1920x1080, all four settings are playable, with Ultra averaging 137 FPS. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and every measured configuration clears it.

The most demanding scenario, 4K Ultra, produces exactly 60 FPS on average. This meets the threshold but with zero headroom for dips. The database records no minimum FPS for 4K Ultra, so the consistency of that 60 FPS average is not fully characterized. In contrast, 4K Medium has a recorded minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 112 FPS, while 4K High averages 81 FPS with no min or max recorded. For players who want guaranteed smoothness with some margin, 4K Medium is the safest choice, as its minimum of 83 FPS stays well above the threshold.

At 1440p and 1080p, the system provides abundant performance. The lowest average across all settings at 1440p is 99 FPS (Ultra), and at 1080p the lowest average is 137 FPS (Ultra). Even the most demanding preset at these resolutions leaves at least 39 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates that this PC is not just playable but comfortably playable at 1440p and 1080p. At 4K, it is playable at all presets, with Ultra being the exact boundary case.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K)

The database records four settings at this resolution. On Low, the average FPS is 125, with no min or max recorded. On Medium, the average is 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 112 FPS. On High, the average is 81 FPS, with no min or max recorded. On Ultra, the average is exactly 60 FPS, with no min or max recorded. The progression is consistent: each step up in presets reduces the average by roughly 15 to 20 FPS. The Medium setting shows a 29 FPS range between min and max, indicating some frame-time variability, but the minimum of 83 FPS is still well above playable.

2560x1440 (1440p)

At this resolution, Low averages 158 FPS, Medium averages 145 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 166 FPS, High averages 133 FPS, and Ultra averages 99 FPS. The Medium setting shows a 43 FPS range, which is larger than at 4K, but the minimum of 123 FPS remains far above the 60 FPS threshold. The drop from Low to Ultra is 59 FPS, reflecting the increased GPU workload at higher presets. Every setting here produces averages above 99 FPS, so even the heaviest preset has substantial headroom.

1920x1080 (1080p)

The strongest performance appears at this resolution. Low averages 178 FPS, Medium averages 163 FPS with a minimum of 138 FPS and a maximum of 187 FPS, High averages 152 FPS, and Ultra averages 137 FPS. The Medium range spans 49 FPS, from 138 to 187, which is the widest recorded range in the entire dataset. Despite this variability, the minimum of 138 FPS is more than double the playable threshold. The Ultra preset at 137 FPS is the only setting below 150 FPS, but it still provides a very smooth experience. At 1080p, this system is clearly GPU-bound at higher presets, but the CPU keeps frame rates high across all settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best setting to use at 4K resolution?

A: The database records that Ultra is the best setting at 3840x2160, with an average FPS of 60. This exactly meets the playable threshold. For more headroom, Medium averages 98 FPS with a minimum of 83 FPS.

Q: Can this system reach 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra?

A: Yes. The measured average at 2560x1440 Ultra is 99 FPS, which is 39 FPS above the playable threshold. All four settings at this resolution exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest GPU rival?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% higher. These differences are negligible for Fivem performance.

Q: What is the slowest setting in the entire dataset?

A: The slowest measured configuration is 4K Ultra, with an average of 60 FPS. No other setting falls below 60 FPS. The next slowest is 4K High at 81 FPS.

Q: Does this combo rank in the top half of all tested systems for Fivem?

A: Yes. The combo ranks 914th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top 25% of all systems. The CPU is in the 84th percentile and the GPU is in the 86th percentile.

Q: Is there any setting where the average FPS drops below the playable threshold?

A: No. Every recorded setting at every resolution has an average FPS of 60 or higher. The lowest average is exactly 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. No minimum FPS is recorded for that configuration, but the average meets the threshold.