Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 60 | 75 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 84 | 108 | 135 | 171 |
| 1080p Full HD | 128 | 164 | 205 | 234 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a strong performance profile for Fivem, with the measured data showing that the system can handle the game smoothly across most resolutions and settings. The recorded frame rates indicate that this pairing is well-balanced for multiplayer scenarios, where consistency and headroom are often more valuable than raw peak output.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the database shows the Ultra preset running at an average of 128 FPS. This is the most demanding setting tested at this resolution, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. The data suggests that players can enable every visual option without worrying about frame rate stability, as the average stays well above the playable line.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains fully playable, with an average of 84 FPS. This is a notable drop from the 1080p figure, but it still leaves substantial headroom above the 60 FPS target. The measured average indicates that even with all settings maxed out, the GPU has enough spare capacity to handle busy scenes in multiplayer lobbies.
For 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Ultra preset falls to an average of 47 FPS, which sits below the playable threshold. The highest setting that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, which records an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is a precise match to the playable threshold, meaning that 4K users should stick to High settings for a consistent experience. The Medium preset at this resolution runs at 75 FPS, which offers more headroom if High proves too demanding in specific moments.
CPU and GPU Roles
The frame rate scaling across resolutions reveals a clear pattern about which component takes the lead. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary driver of performance. The jump from Low (234 FPS) to Ultra (128 FPS) shows a steep drop of 106 FPS, which indicates that the graphics load is ramping up quickly, but the CPU is still able to feed the GPU efficiently even at lower settings. The Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides enough processing power to keep the GPU busy at these lower resolutions.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. The Low preset here runs at 171 FPS, which is 63 FPS lower than at 1080p. This gap demonstrates that the rendering resolution is now placing more strain on the RTX 4070, while the CPU still has headroom to keep up. The Ultra preset at 84 FPS is 44 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra figure, showing that the GPU workload is scaling as expected with pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The Low preset drops to 95 FPS, which is 139 FPS below the 1080p Low result. This is a massive reduction that points directly at the GPU having to process four times the pixels. The RTX 4070, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus, starts to run into bandwidth and compute limits at this resolution. The CPU, meanwhile, is likely still not saturated, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K Low, the frame rate is well above the 60 FPS line.
The scaling between presets also tells a story. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Medium is 29 FPS, while between Medium and Ultra it is 77 FPS. This nonlinear progression suggests that the Ultra preset introduces features that are particularly heavy on the GPU, such as higher shadow quality and post-processing effects. At 4K, the same comparison shows a 20 FPS gap between Low and Medium, and a 28 FPS gap between Medium and Ultra, indicating that the GPU is becoming the bottleneck across all settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data provides a complete picture of performance at each resolution and setting combination. At 1920x1080, the Low preset leads with an average of 234 FPS. Medium follows at 205 FPS, with a minimum of 175 FPS and a maximum of 236 FPS. High runs at 164 FPS, and Ultra drops to 128 FPS. The wide range between minimum and maximum at Medium suggests that certain scenes, likely those with many players or heavy weather effects, can cause noticeable frame time spikes.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 171 FPS. Medium comes in at 135 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. High records 108 FPS, and Ultra settles at 84 FPS. The Medium preset shows a 41 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, which is slightly tighter than the 1080p result, hinting that the GPU is starting to smooth out the frame delivery as it becomes more heavily loaded.
At 3840x2160, the numbers compress significantly. Low averages 95 FPS, Medium runs at 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 86 FPS, High hits exactly 60 FPS, and Ultra falls to 47 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K has a 22 FPS range, which is the narrowest of any Medium setting across all resolutions. This indicates that at 4K, the system is consistently hitting GPU limits rather than experiencing CPU-driven spikes.
The lack of minimum and maximum values for several settings, including all Low and Ultra presets, means that the database only captures average performance for those configurations. The available data for Medium presets shows that frame pacing remains acceptable, with minimums staying above the playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 64 FPS is close to the 60 FPS line, but still safe.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X sits within a tight performance band. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34,222, which is 0.1% higher than the 3700X. The AMD EPYC 4244P also scores 34,220, another 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-13450HX is 0.2% ahead with 34,333, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H trails by 0.5% with 34,083. These deltas are all within half a percent, meaning that swapping to any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, assuming the GPU remains the same.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has close competitors as well. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37,628, which is 0.1% below the 4070's 37,648. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507, a 0.4% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% higher at 38,135, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 sits 1.3% lower at 37,157. In practice, these GPUs would deliver almost indistinguishable performance in Fivem, with the RTX 4080 Mobile potentially providing a few extra frames at 4K Ultra, but not enough to cross the 60 FPS line.
The combination of these rival components suggests that the overall system behavior would remain similar. If a user paired the Ryzen 7 3700X with any of the listed GPU rivals, the frame rates would shift by only a few percentage points. The same applies to swapping the CPU while keeping the RTX 4070. The only meaningful change would come from using the RTX 4080 Mobile, which might push 4K Ultra closer to the 50 FPS range, but still short of playable.
How This Combo Ranks
The database places this combination at rank 1019 out of 3707 tested combos. This puts it in the top 27.5% of all systems evaluated for Fivem. The percentile data for the individual components supports this positioning. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards. Both components are well above average, which explains why the combo lands in the upper quarter of tested systems.
The rank of 1019 indicates that there are 1018 combos that perform better in this game, but also 2688 combos that perform worse. This suggests that while the system is not at the absolute top tier, it is comfortably in the upper echelon. For a multiplayer game like Fivem, which often relies on server-side performance and network conditions, having a combo in this range provides a solid foundation. The measured frame rates confirm that the system can handle the most demanding settings at 1080p and 1440p, which is where most players will spend their time.
The gap between this combo and the very top performers likely comes from newer CPUs with higher single-thread scores and GPUs with more VRAM or faster memory bandwidth. The 3700X, despite being from the 3000 series, still holds its own with a strong multithreaded score of 22,458 in Passmark. The RTX 4070, with its 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, remains a capable GPU for 1440p gaming.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 47, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at this resolution is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 runs at an average of 84 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best choice for 1440p, as it offers the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth performance.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 34,260. Its closest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 at 34,222 (0.1% lower), the AMD EPYC 4244P at 34,220 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34,333 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H at 34,083 (0.5% lower). Performance differences are negligible.
Q: What is the frame rate at 1080p Medium?
A: The measured average is 205 FPS, with a minimum of 175 FPS and a maximum of 236 FPS. This provides substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, even in demanding scenes.
Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at 4K?
A: Yes. The frame rate drops from 234 FPS at 1080p Low to 95 FPS at 4K Low, a reduction of 139 FPS. This indicates that the RTX 4070 is the limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU has enough headroom to handle the lower resolution scenarios.
Q: How does this combo rank overall?
A: The combination ranks 1019 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 27.5% of all systems in the database, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile.
The Verdict
The data clearly shows that this PC can run Fivem successfully across most configurations. At 1920x1080, all four tested settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 128 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra running at 84 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system can run the game at High settings with an average of 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold exactly. The Ultra preset at 4K falls short at 47 FPS, so players seeking maximum visual fidelity at that resolution would need to accept lower frame rates or reduce settings.
The verdict by resolution confirms this analysis. For 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best option at 60 FPS. For 2560x1440, all settings including Ultra are playable, with Ultra at 84 FPS. For 1920x1080, the same applies, with Ultra at 128 FPS. This system is well-suited for Fivem, offering smooth performance at the two most common gaming resolutions and a viable 4K experience with adjusted settings.