Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
189 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
124 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
61 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
8.4ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 34,260
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 44 54 69
1440p QHD 61 78 98 124
1080p Full HD 92 119 149 189

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 119
1920x1080 Low 189
1920x1080 Medium 149
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Low 124
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 Ultra 61
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080 with the highest settings?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows an average of 92 FPS at 1920x1080 on Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 3840x2160?

A: At 4K resolution, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 69 FPS. Medium settings drop to 54 FPS, which falls below the playable line.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its closest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, 0.3% lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 score 17551 and 17509, respectively, sitting 0.5% and 0.7% below.

Q: What kind of CPU performance does the Ryzen 7 3700X offer?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 34260 and sits in the 84th percentile among all CPUs. It scores 2092 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 204 in single-core tests. In Geekbench, it records 8899 multi-core and 1593 single-core.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for Fivem's performance at 1440p?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs. At 2560x1440, Fivem drops from 124 FPS on Low to 61 FPS on Ultra, a 63 FPS swing driven by graphics load. The CPU remains important, but the GPU's rendering workload dominates the frame rate differences across presets.

Q: Which CPU rivals are closest to the Ryzen 7 3700X in overall benchmark performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, just 0.1% below the 3700X. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34083, 0.5% lower.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1993 out of 3707 tested combos in the database for Fivem. This places the pairing in the upper-middle portion of all recorded configurations. It is not a top-tier setup, but it sits ahead of a substantial share of tested systems.

The rank reflects the combined capability of both components. The CPU holds an 84th percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. That imbalance matters. The processor is a stronger relative performer than the graphics card, which means the GPU is more likely to constrain overall results in graphically demanding scenarios.

The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1920x1080, the system produces 189 FPS on Low settings, 149 FPS on Medium, 119 FPS on High, and 92 FPS on Ultra. The large gap between Low and Ultra, roughly 97 FPS, shows how heavily the graphics workload scales with preset quality. At 2560x1440, the same pattern continues: 124 FPS on Low, 98 FPS on Medium, 78 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the numbers tighten further, with 69 FPS on Low, 54 FPS on Medium, 44 FPS on High, and 34 FPS on Ultra.

The rank of 1993 out of 3707 indicates that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in Fivem, but it also shows that a large number of tested configurations perform worse. The system is comfortably capable of exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p across most presets, which puts it in a practical position for this multiplayer title. The 4K results, however, reveal clear limits. Only the Low preset stays above 60 FPS at that resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded FPS data shows how the balance of responsibility shifts between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 189 FPS on Low and 149 FPS on Medium, which are high enough that the CPU can feed frames quickly without the GPU becoming a severe bottleneck. Even on Ultra, the 92 FPS result indicates that neither component is overwhelmed at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more work. The Low preset still produces 124 FPS, but Ultra falls to 61 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 63 FPS. Compare that to the 1080p gap of 97 FPS between Low and Ultra. The smaller spread at 1440p suggests the GPU is starting to cap performance at the higher preset levels. The CPU still has headroom, but the graphics card cannot maintain the same frame rates as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. Low settings produce 69 FPS, which is the only playable result at this resolution. Medium drops to 54 FPS, High to 44 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is only 35 FPS, far narrower than at lower resolutions. This compression indicates that every preset at 4K is heavily bound by the GPU's rendering throughput. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is not the limiting factor here. The RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus simply cannot push the same frame rates at 4K that it achieves at 1080p.

The pattern is clear. At 1080p, both components share the load, and the system produces high frame rates across all presets. At 1440p, the GPU starts to matter more, but the system still clears 60 FPS on every preset including Ultra. At 4K, the GPU dominates the outcome entirely, and only the lowest preset remains playable. Players targeting high refresh rates should stay at 1080p or 1440p. Players who insist on 4K will need to accept Low settings or consider a stronger graphics card.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem successfully at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with all presets clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 92 FPS on Ultra, 119 FPS on High, 149 FPS on Medium, and 189 FPS on Low. Every setting is comfortably above 60 FPS, and the Ultra result leaves enough margin for multiplayer fluctuations.

At 2560x1440, the system still clears the threshold on every preset. Ultra averages 61 FPS, which is just above the playable line. High averages 78 FPS, Medium 98 FPS, and Low 124 FPS. The Ultra result is close to the boundary, so players who prefer a safety margin might choose High instead. The data shows that High offers 17 FPS more headroom while remaining visually demanding.

At 3840x2160, the verdict changes. Only Low settings produce a playable result, with an average of 69 FPS. Medium falls to 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. High drops to 44 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming at higher presets. Players with 4K displays should either select Low settings or reduce the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.

The database identifies the best playable setting at each resolution. At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best choice with 92 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra also wins with 61 FPS. At 3840x2160, Low is the only playable option with 69 FPS. The overall verdict is that this system is a strong 1080p and capable 1440p machine for Fivem, but it is not a 4K performer beyond the lowest preset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 34260. Several nearby processors deliver nearly identical overall performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34083, 0.5% lower. In practice, swapping the 3700X for any of these chips would produce very little change in Fivem's frame rates, since the differences are within a fraction of a percent.

The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest GPU rivals are closely matched. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, 0.5% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509, 0.7% lower. These differences are small enough that they would not produce a meaningful change in Fivem's measured FPS. A system with the RTX 4060 replaced by the Radeon HD 7790 would behave almost identically in synthetic terms, though the RTX 4060 offers modern features like ray tracing cores and DLSS support that the older card lacks.

For players considering an upgrade path, the CPU side has more headroom than the GPU side. The 3700X ranks in the 84th percentile among CPUs, while the RTX 4060 ranks in the 61st percentile among GPUs. This means the graphics card is the weaker link in the pairing. Moving to a stronger GPU would likely produce larger gains in Fivem, especially at 1440p and 4K where the GPU already dominates performance. The CPU's high percentile ranking suggests it can keep up with a more powerful graphics card without becoming the bottleneck.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 92 FPS. Players can use the highest visual quality without sacrificing playability. The system has enough headroom that even Ultra leaves 32 FPS above the threshold. For players who prefer smoother motion, High delivers 119 FPS and Medium delivers 149 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is also Ultra, with an average of 61 FPS. This result is just barely above the playable line. The minimum recorded FPS for the 1440p Medium preset is 83 FPS, which suggests the Ultra preset likely experiences dips below its average in busy multiplayer scenes. Players who want a buffer should consider High at 78 FPS, which offers 17 FPS more headroom than Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 69 FPS. Medium is not playable, with an average of 54 FPS and a minimum of 46 FPS. High and Ultra are far below the threshold at 44 FPS and 34 FPS respectively. The 4K Low setting is the only viable option at this resolution, and even it has limited headroom above the 60 FPS line.

The data shows a clear progression. At 1080p, the system can run the game at maximum quality with strong performance. At 1440p, maximum quality is still playable, but the margin is thin. At 4K, the system drops to minimum quality to maintain playability. Players should match their settings to their display resolution accordingly.