Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the Intel Arc B370 ranks 3420 out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem. This places the combo in the bottom 8% of all systems in the database, a position driven almost entirely by the graphics side of the pairing. The CPU itself sits in the 84th percentile among all processors, but the Arc B370 lands in the 5th percentile among all GPUs. The disparity is stark: the processor is a solid mid-pack performer, while the graphics solution is an integrated-class part that drags the overall ranking down.

The recorded data shows that this is not a combination built for demanding resolutions. Across every tested setting at 4K, average frame rates fall between 14 and 29 FPS, all well below the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 1440p, the best average is 53 FPS on Low settings, which still misses the target. Only at 1080p does the combo manage to cross the 60 FPS line, and even then it does so on just two of the four available presets. The rank of 3420 reflects this reality: it is a system that can handle light workloads at modest resolutions, but it is not a competitive gaming platform for high-refresh or high-detail play.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 7 3700X and the Arc B370 is unusually clear in Fivem. The CPU brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz and a 32 MB L3 cache. These are more than adequate specifications for a multiplayer title like Fivem, which typically relies on single-thread performance and memory latency rather than massive core counts. The CPU's benchmark scores support this: a PassMark single-thread score of 2656 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1593 indicate that the processor is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.

The GPU, however, is a different story. The Arc B370 is an integrated graphics part with 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation units. It has a boost clock of 2400 MHz and delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The chip is built on Intel's 3 nm process with the Xe3-LPG architecture, but its integrated nature means it shares system memory and carries no dedicated VRAM. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all legacy discrete parts from over a decade ago.

The scaling data shows how the GPU becomes the bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 80 FPS. Dropping to 1440p Low cuts that to 53 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K Low, the average falls to 29 FPS, another 45% reduction. These are massive drops for what should be resolution scaling, and they indicate that the Arc B370 is running out of fillrate and shading capacity long before the CPU becomes relevant. The CPU's role is effectively done at 1080p; beyond that, the GPU simply cannot keep up regardless of how much headroom the processor has.

Preset scaling tells the same story. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium drops the average from 80 to 63 FPS, a 21% decrease. Moving from Medium to High drops it further to 50 FPS, a 21% decrease again. The pattern repeats at 1440p: Low at 53 FPS, Medium at 41 FPS, High at 33 FPS. The GPU is the dominant factor at every resolution and every preset, and the CPU's performance headroom is never the constraining element. In short, if you are looking to improve Fivem performance on this combo, the data points squarely at the graphics side.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 7 3700X are all close in average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, a mere 0.1% higher than the 3700X's average of 34260. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also 0.1% lower. On the Intel side, the Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, which is 0.2% higher, and the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34083, which is 0.5% lower. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver near-identical Fivem performance when paired with the same GPU. The differences are within measurement noise, and the game would not distinguish between them.

For the Arc B370, the rival list is dominated by much older hardware. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower. These are all ancient parts by modern standards, and their presence in the rival list reinforces how far down the performance ladder the Arc B370 sits. Anyone considering this combo should expect Fivem performance roughly equivalent to a mid-range GPU from the early 2010s.

It is notably the CPU's rivals are all modern parts, some of them from 2025 or later, which speaks to the Ryzen 7 3700X's longevity. The 3000 series processor, released in 2019 with a launch MSRP of $329, still trades blows with current-generation mobile and workstation chips. But the GPU's rivals are a reminder that integrated graphics, even on a state-of-the-art 3 nm process, cannot match the raw throughput of even modest discrete solutions.

The Verdict

The short answer is: yes, this PC can run Fivem, but only under specific conditions. According to the verdict by resolution, the combo does not reach 60 FPS at 4K or 1440p under any preset. At 3840x2160, the playable settings list is empty, meaning no tested preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. The same is true at 2560x1440. At 1920x1080, however, the Low and Medium presets both clear 60 FPS, and the best settings are Medium with an average of 63 FPS.

The verdict data shows that 1080p Medium is the ceiling for this combination. At that preset, the average frame rate is 63 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The minimum recorded at 1080p Medium is 54 FPS, and the maximum is 72 FPS. This means the experience will be mostly smooth, but there will be dips below 60 FPS in busier scenes. For a multiplayer game like Fivem, where player density can vary wildly, those dips could be noticeable.

At 1440p, the best case is Low settings with an average of 53 FPS. That is below the playability threshold, and the experience would feel less fluid. At 4K, the best case is Low at 29 FPS, which is not playable by any reasonable standard. If the goal is a consistent 60 FPS, the only viable configuration is 1080p with Medium or lower settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded data shows four presets. Low settings produce an average of 29 FPS with no min or max recorded. Medium produces an average of 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26. High produces an average of 18 FPS. Ultra produces an average of 14 FPS. None of these are close to playable.

At 2560x1440, Low settings average 53 FPS. Medium averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48. High averages 33 FPS. Ultra averages 26 FPS. The gap between Low and the next preset is substantial, and even Low falls short of the 60 FPS target.

At 1920x1080, the numbers are more encouraging. Low settings average 80 FPS. Medium averages 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. High averages 50 FPS. Ultra averages 39 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one that clears 60 FPS while offering better visual quality than Low. High and Ultra both fall below the threshold, and Ultra's 39 FPS average would feel noticeably stuttery in a fast-paced multiplayer environment.

The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: each step up in settings costs roughly 15% to 25% of the frame rate, and each step up in resolution costs significantly more. The combo is most comfortable at 1080p Low, where it has enough headroom to stay well above 60 FPS, and it is marginally playable at 1080p Medium.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, yes, on Low and Medium presets. The Low preset averages 80 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 63 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, no tested preset reaches 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo at 1080p?

A: The best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are Medium, with an average of 63 FPS. The minimum at this preset is 54 FPS, which means there may be brief dips below the threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher).

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 3700X the bottleneck in this combo?

A: No. The CPU scores in the 84th percentile among all processors, and its nearest rivals are within 0.5% of its average score. The GPU, which sits in the 5th percentile, is the limiting factor at all resolutions.

Q: Can this combo handle 1440p gaming?

A: Not at 60 FPS. The best 1440p result is 53 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the playability threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra are progressively lower.

Q: What frame rates does the combo achieve at 4K?

A: The averages are 29 FPS on Low, 23 FPS on Medium, 18 FPS on High, and 14 FPS on Ultra. None of these are playable.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, so there is no recommended setting. The best average is 29 FPS on Low, which is well below the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, no preset reaches 60 FPS either. The best average is 53 FPS on Low, which is close but still short of the target. Players who must use 1440p should accept that the experience will not be smooth.

At 1920x1080, the recommended preset is Medium, which averages 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 80 FPS and would provide a more consistent experience if frame pacing is a concern, but Medium offers the best balance of visual quality and playability for this combination.