Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 80 | 99 | 126 |
| 1440p QHD | 111 | 143 | 179 | 227 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 218 | 272 | 345 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, positioning the system in the 95th percentile of tested hardware configurations. The CPU ranks in the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a balanced pairing that handles even the most demanding settings at 4K resolution. Benchmark data indicates this combo achieves a rank of 180 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it firmly in the top 5% of all systems evaluated for this multiplayer title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X posts an average benchmark score of 29,713, placing it in close competition with several AMD processors that deliver nearly identical performance. The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, which scores 29,656, representing a mere 0.2% performance difference — effectively indistinguishable in real-world gaming scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29,868, coming in 0.5% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT achieves 29,879, also 0.5% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS rounds out the group with a score of 29,955, outperforming the 9600X by 0.8%. All four alternatives fall within a 1% performance band, meaning users could expect virtually identical frame rates in Fivem regardless of which processor from this group is selected.
On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves an average benchmark score of 56,083. The AMD Radeon 8060S comes closest with a score of 55,757, just 0.6% behind, making it a near-perfect match for the RTX 5080 in terms of raw compute capability. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, trailing by 0.7%, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828, a 2.3% deficit. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE actually outperforms the RTX 5080 in this benchmark, scoring 57,367, which represents a 2.2% advantage. In practical terms for Fivem, any of these GPUs would deliver comparable frame rates, though the RTX 5080's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth give it unique advantages at higher resolutions that synthetic scores may not fully capture.
FAQ
Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X bottleneck the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Fivem?
A: No. The CPU's single-thread benchmark score of 4,570 in PassMark and 1,253 in 3DMark single-thread tests indicates strong per-core performance that complements the GPU well. The combination ranks 180th out of 3,707 tested combos, suggesting the pairing is well-balanced for this title.
Q: What is the maximum playable setting at 4K resolution?
A: Ultra settings at 3840x2160 achieve an average of 62 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The verdict data confirms all four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at 4K, with Ultra being the best setting at 62 FPS average.
Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its closest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 5080 scores 56,083 on average benchmarks, sitting 0.6% above the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the only nearby GPU that scores higher, at 57,367, a 2.2% advantage.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p with High settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the system delivers 143 FPS on average. This represents more than double the 60 FPS threshold, providing significant headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios in Fivem.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 9600X significantly slower than its nearest rivals?
A: No. The largest performance gap between the 9600X and its four nearest rivals is only 0.8%, demonstrated by the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scoring 29,955 versus the 9600X's 29,713. The closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, is just 0.2% behind.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes, and with substantial margin. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system achieves 169 FPS average. Even the most demanding preset at the lowest resolution tested leaves enormous performance reserves.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 180th out of 3,707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the top 4.9% of all systems evaluated. This positioning reflects the synergy between a processor that scores in the 81st percentile among all CPUs and a graphics card in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The combination's high ranking is particularly notable given that Fivem is a multiplayer title where CPU performance often plays an outsized role in maintaining consistent frame rates during player-dense scenarios.
The rank suggests this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems tested for Fivem, including many that feature more expensive or newer components. The 9600X's 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.40 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1,253, which is critical for game logic and physics in multiplayer environments. Meanwhile, the RTX 5080's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability and 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure the GPU never becomes the limiting factor in frame production. The 180th rank out of 3,707 combos indicates that only 179 other system configurations deliver better measured performance in Fivem, and the margin separating this combo from those above it is likely narrow given the high absolute frame rates achieved.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Fivem, and it does so with exceptional headroom across all tested resolutions. The verdict data confirms that every resolution and every settings preset tested — from 1080p Low to 4K Ultra — clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 3840x2160, the most demanding configuration tested, Ultra settings achieve 62 FPS average, barely clearing the threshold but doing so consistently enough to be classified as playable. Lowering to High settings at 4K provides a more comfortable 80 FPS average, while Medium delivers 99 FPS and Low reaches 126 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the system demonstrates its true capabilities, with Ultra settings hitting 111 FPS average and High reaching 143 FPS. The 1080p results are nothing short of spectacular, with Ultra settings at 169 FPS and Low settings reaching 345 FPS. The best settings per resolution are Ultra at all three resolutions — 62 FPS at 4K, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 169 FPS at 1080p. For players with high-refresh-rate displays, 1440p with High settings at 143 FPS or 1080p with Medium settings at 272 FPS offer particularly compelling experiences that maximize both visual quality and smoothness.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers extraordinary performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 345 FPS, Medium settings yield 272 FPS with a minimum of 232 and maximum of 313 FPS, High settings achieve 218 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage 169 FPS. These numbers indicate the GPU is rarely the bottleneck at 1080p, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance becomes the determining factor.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains extremely high. Low settings produce 227 FPS average, Medium settings deliver 179 FPS with a minimum of 152 and maximum of 206 FPS, High settings achieve 143 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 111 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 35-38% performance reduction across settings, consistent with the increase in pixel count from 2.07 million to 3.69 million.
At 3840x2160, performance remains well above playable thresholds but shows more significant scaling costs. Low settings deliver 126 FPS, Medium settings produce 99 FPS with a minimum of 85 and maximum of 114 FPS, High settings achieve 80 FPS, and Ultra settings just clear the 60 FPS threshold at 62 FPS. The transition from 1440p to 4K represents a 44-58% performance drop, reflecting the 225% increase in pixel count from 3.69 million to 8.29 million pixels. Notably, the Medium settings at 4K provide the only measured minimum and maximum FPS data points in the entire dataset, with an 85 FPS minimum that remains comfortably above the playability threshold.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves 169 FPS average. This provides more than 2.8 times the required frame rate, making it the clear choice for maximum visual fidelity at 1080p. The enormous headroom means players could enable additional graphical enhancements without concern.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings remain the best choice, delivering 111 FPS average. This represents 1.85 times the 60 FPS threshold, providing smooth gameplay even during intense multiplayer encounters. The margin is sufficient that even the most demanding scenes in Fivem should maintain frame rates well above the playability threshold.
At 3840x2160, Ultra settings are still achievable, but the 62 FPS average provides only a slim 2 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For players who prioritize consistent frame rates over maximum visual quality, High settings at 80 FPS offer a more comfortable experience with a 33% performance buffer. Medium settings at 99 FPS provide even more headroom while still delivering respectable visual quality. The data indicates that 4K Ultra is technically playable, but the narrow margin suggests that High or Medium settings may be more appropriate for competitive multiplayer scenarios where frame consistency is paramount.